west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 33,878
What clause did he breach?Doesn't matter what I'm happy with. GL signed a contract. He's breached it.
If he quits the BBC he can say whatever he likes. It's quite simple really.
What clause did he breach?Doesn't matter what I'm happy with. GL signed a contract. He's breached it.
If he quits the BBC he can say whatever he likes. It's quite simple really.
Doesn't matter what I'm happy with. GL signed a contract. He's breached it.
If he quits the BBC he can say whatever he likes. It's quite simple really.
Why don’t the same conditions apply to the likes of Alan Sugar and Andrew Neill then?Doesn't matter what I'm happy with. GL signed a contract. He's breached it.
He's not in news or current affairs, so no such clause exists. The BBC being impartial doesn't mean people can't have opinions, it means they are meant to cover both sides of the story.I believe he signed a contract with the BBC as a contractor, the contract had an impartiality clause which he has breached, several times.
I think other senior presenters have voiced their opinion as to why he can do that and presumably they can't.
So unless the BBC acted they could all start with their own particular soapboxes.
Gary Lineker is paid by and is the face of BBC sport. He can't suddenly start condemning the Government when the BBC's doctrine is impartiality. Having a senior figure attacking the Gov is not a viable situation.
Thank you for the reply.I believe he signed a contract with the BBC as a contractor, the contract had an impartiality clause which he has breached, several times.
I think other senior presenters have voiced their opinion as to why he can do that and presumably they can't.
So unless the BBC acted they could all start with their own particular soapboxes.
Gary Lineker is paid by and is the face of BBC sport. He can't suddenly start condemning the Government when the BBC's doctrine is impartiality. Having a senior figure attacking the Gov is not a viable situation.
Impartiality though surely doesn’t mean ‘cannot attack the government’?I believe he signed a contract with the BBC as a contractor, the contract had an impartiality clause which he has breached, several times.
I think other senior presenters have voiced their opinion as to why he can do that and presumably they can't.
So unless the BBC acted they could all start with their own particular soapboxes.
Gary Lineker is paid by and is the face of BBC sport. He can't suddenly start condemning the Government when the BBC's doctrine is impartiality. Having a senior figure attacking the Gov is not a viable situation.

Does the BBC been impartial cover football as well ?He's not in news or current affairs, so no such clause exists. The BBC being impartial doesn't mean people can't have opinions, it means they are meant to cover both sides of the story.
He didn't even voice his opinion on the BBC's platform anyway, so it's got nothing to do with them. The whole thing is a bizarre overreaction.
Yep, how do they square this with employing Jeremy Clarkson for years who would write a column of his hilariously outrageous views in The Sun every week, and would regularly say something controversial specifically to promote a BBC programme? They actually banned news and current affairs presenters from writing newspaper columns back in 2003, but that's never been a rule for other presenters. I don't see how tweeting is any different from having a paid opinion column.He's not in news or current affairs, so no such clause exists. The BBC being impartial doesn't mean people can't have opinions, it means they are meant to cover both sides of the story.
He didn't even voice his opinion on the BBC's platform anyway, so it's got nothing to do with them. The whole thing is a bizarre overreaction.
NoDoes the BBC been impartial cover football as well ?
No, what I’m saying is that there’s an awful lot of people complaining about cancel culture who’ve now decided they want Lineker cancelled.Does that mean admitting cancelling the other people now wasn't okay? Is cancelling anyone for any views whatsoever, supportive or not, now not okay?
Where are we on the spectrum of morality, it appears to keep changing.
In a nut shell.Impartiality though surely doesn’t mean ‘cannot attack the government’?
Lord Sugar is paid by the BBC and is the face of The Apprentice and yet he said this, in an election year, as well….
View attachment 71686
I would say it happened in the run up to the 2010 General Election and has continued ever since....Exactly. The BBC could have had its cake and eaten it.
I struggle to understand how and when people running things became so fucking stupid.
I'm.not a big political person.Never trust a Tory - end of.
Gary Lineker is entitled to say or tweet anything he wants to.
This is called free speech.