bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
This
its really interesting that any time someone challenges something you have to get defensive.....I said you are perfectly entitled to put what you want....Im perfectly entitled to challenge it. I also said this wasnt about football as there is a more important point here.....I'll start what thread I want thanks, if you don't like it (the majority seem to have taken it for how it was intended) then feel free to sod off somewhere else, meanwhile you can always get back to moaning about City, there'll be a match thread along later.
because the person who you say has inane waffle has been removed because of a very valid point that he made....then some people turn that into a reason to celebrate that we will get more football without pundits....slightly missng the vastly more important point by glossing over it with a thread like this.Why is this thread such a problem for you ?
If you want to comment on Lineker and what he said go in the politics thread.
This thread is about whether Motd will be better without inane waffle.
This
will local coverage still be on maybe?Once again though, it's the more vulnerable people in society that the Government/BBC has affected with this awful decision.
No football coverage on the TV or radio all weekend on the BBC because of this.
That means older people who can't use the internet, people who can't afford Sky/BT, people who have to use radio to take in a live game etc...all lose access to the most popular sport in the country on the public funded service.
Now I know there are plenty who can skirt around this but there are many who can't, plenty like to slag the coverage off but it's still massively important to so many.
The boss at the BBC feels it is acceptable to remove Lineker because of his opinions whilst publicly supporting the Tories and Boris Johnson, make it make sense.
not as glad as the players or managersAlso glad no player or manager will talk to the bbc tonite
This
will local coverage still be on maybe?
bbc manchester and such?
no 5 live football coverage at all today by the look of it.
Bit of a stretch really that one. There is a tonne of bbc local radio sport coverage and then god forbid, maybe talksport. BBC is not the be all and end all it once was and really this shouldn’t impact anyone’s ability to listen to scores or coverage.Once again though, it's the more vulnerable people in society that the Government/BBC has affected with this awful decision.
No football coverage on the TV or radio all weekend on the BBC because of this.
That means older people who can't use the internet, people who can't afford Sky/BT, people who have to use radio to take in a live game etc...all lose access to the most popular sport in the country on the public funded service.
Now I know there are plenty who can skirt around this but there are many who can't, plenty like to slag the coverage off but it's still massively important to so many.
The boss at the BBC feels it is acceptable to remove Lineker because of his opinions whilst publicly supporting the Tories and Boris Johnson, make it make sense.
be aware - this is NOT a parody account
be aware - this is NOT a parody account
Watching the US stream, I don't mind Le Saux & Dixon. They don't seem to have a script to follow.Whenever I get a US stream I'm usually impressed with Robbie Earle, is engaging and provides actual insight. Nedum speaks brilliantly too.
Our main representative in the media is Micah, he is a blue .. ... But he's lightweight, comic relief and as a result there's no weight given to his views. It doesn't help that like Joleon, he doesn't challenge the red shirt narrative. Micah could do worse than take a leaf out of Ian Wright's book who has matured into a mostly reasonable guy.
Her voice might be blast from the Sweeney, but Emma Hayes is a good tactical analyst.
In the UK after years of dumbing down with almost exclusively red shirts, we are where we are. At least tonight there'll be no Stephen Warnock in Primark glasses there to make sure Smith look balanced!
All BBC commentators have stood down.Depends on whether they use the additional time to show more highlights.
Drives me made when they show the highlights and they somehow make a game of of 22 shots Vs 3 look equal, only to then explain to us all afterwards some insight supported by the clips they didn't show.
Bit like a crime drama revealing at the end that it was a totally different suspect, who they only introduced for the final ten minutes of the series, leaving loads of unanswered loose ends.
Are the commentators stepping out, too? Will they play some nice mellow jazz over the top to compensate?