PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I put a comment in the Ref watch thread this morning about that. I think Pep's team selection was directly because Lahoz was appointed referee. He didn't play a DM for the only time ever, because he feared Ferny or Gundogan, would receive 2 yellows from Lahoz. This couldn't be reviewed by VAR. I put the blame on UEFA for appointing such an official with extensive high profile history against Pep!
Play your best team, and let everybody else worry.
 
I took the lack of a 'no' to mean they're looking at what came out in the US and seeing what lawyers think of it. The next step would be to ask Newcastle for their explanation on seemingly opposing views, and that'll take a while.

At what point this becomes an 'investigation' is unclear. However there was no way Masters could answer it yes without the PL having issued a statement that they were beforehand.
Well it was mentioned elsewhere that the investigation was already underway, but the PL have said nothing about it.

I saw articles from February 2023 saying the PL declined to respond when asked about the anomaly.

Evidently they're aware of the issue, but I found it very odd that the PL declined to even confirm if there was an investigation ongoing or not.

Contrast that to the way they've come at City? :-/
 
Masters - he must feel like he's trying to keep several camps happy; the govt want a regulator; some clubs want one; some clubs don't want one. He can't say he's in favour without annoying someone, and can't say the PL is in favour either for the same reason.

I don't think the govt do either. They'll fear the fallout. Parry was strong on behalf of the EFL, Crouch impressive too. It'll turn into something incredibly thin and ineffective, I expect.
Masters was third on the list to be chosen the first two candidates offered the job turn it down as both hinted that some clubs held two much power !!! Wonder who the hell they could be ! Common denominator might me those with American owners!
 
Masters was third on the list to be chosen the first two candidates offered the job turn it down as both hinted that some clubs held two much power !!! Wonder who the hell they could be ! Common denominator might me those with American owners!
He's a good boy....

NjgyNi5qcGVn.jpeg


And does as he's told.
 
Masters was third on the list to be chosen the first two candidates offered the job turn it down as both hinted that some clubs held two much power !!! Wonder who the hell they could be ! Common denominator might me those with American owners!
And those same two clubs and them alone were allowed to ‘vet’ his appointment
 
To be fair that story looks like a lot of re-hashed garbage from the Guardian. It doesn't suggest Chelsea have done anything wrong. It is an issue for the Dutch League and Vitesse Arnhem and the Dutch League don't seem bothered. It is the usual distorted bollocks produced by David Conn these days.
Yep, fair enough. I shouldn’t be falling into the same trap as opposition fans!
 
There is more I cant see how they will not be charged it is alot more solid case for PL then against City
"The accounts published this week take the club's losses over the Premier League's rolling three-year period to £241.9m - they made a profit of £32.5m in 2019-20 followed by a record loss of £153.4m the following year - putting them at risk of breaching the limit of £105m."


The Daily Mail I know but interesting
Worst kept secret in football but nevertheless corrupt as fuck
 
There is more I cant see how they will not be charged it is alot more solid case for PL then against City
"The accounts published this week take the club's losses over the Premier League's rolling three-year period to £241.9m - they made a profit of £32.5m in 2019-20 followed by a record loss of £153.4m the following year - putting them at risk of breaching the limit of £105m."


The Daily Mail I know but interesting
they wrote one massive loan off when takeover happened will that be swept under axminster carpet
 
From a previous post but relevant now ...
There is plenty of historical evidence how competitors maneuvered their employees into positions of influence to target rules at MCFC. Just read the comments from Gill ex MUFC
CEO as he takes up his new exciting role in UEFA. In hindsight its so obvious what his intentions were - he says "Just let me make up the new rules I KNOW what is needed" ...

 
So let me get this right
We're being charged because we're alleged to have paid Mancini 2 contracts & image rights off the books yet Chelsea have allegedly circumvented ffp by paying Vitese secretly for youth players & nothing will happen. Abramovich probably has still got the dirt on the EPL.
 
I thought it was UEFA that "spilled the lot." The details of the PL probe have been pretty much kept under wraps, not least because both parties wanted to keep them confidential. Masters did confirm a probe was under way but I can't remember much else.
A positive way of looking at this is that there is nothing for the PL "to spill" because they have got little or no evidence. It has been speculated that the PL would not be so stupid as to lay 100 plus charges against City with "no evidence." But watching Masters' performace yesterday suggests he may be more stupid than anyone has realised. It has been suggested that he was appointed as a "puppet" for LFC and MUFC...and yesterday he behaved like one. I know who I would back in a shoot-out between Masters and Khaldoon.
A puppet that had an unusually large fist up its arse pulling the strings
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top