Match Thread | Man City vs West Ham (03/05/23)

[NptonBlue89!]

1st I can under stand but the second one on stones is stonewall

 

[bobmcfc]

That was a fooking penalty on haaland

 

[Newman Noggs]

I'm speechless. On what fucking planet are they not penalties!

 

[Blueknows]

Think he kicks through him a.little bit ooo he does , fucking ratboy , clear pen doesn't touch the ball and goes through him

 

[tweety]

Seriously wtf is going on. Manipulation as usual

 

[Bez]

2 good penalty shouts...

 

[Josh_D]

Whatever. I’ve accepted it. Can’t burst a vessel over incompetent officials.

 

[Chi-town blues]

that’s foul on stones

 

[BlueMooner87]

Is VAR not checking these ?

 

[deano ou812]

While it’s 1-0 there’s always a chance but a second goal kills West Ham we know what’s going on it’s a disgrace and cheating..

 

[platty7]

Pen all day long

 

[glyntowen]

the Haaland one was debatable, the Stones one was a definite

The haaland one was the more blatant one, kicked his right foot before the ball

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

These new rules about fouls in the box are quite baffling.

 

[Blueknows]

That was a fooking penalty on haaland

And on stones lol

 

[Bluemoonadam]

While it’s 1-0 there’s always a chance but a second goal kills West Ham we know what’s going on it’s a disgrace and cheating..

Aye thats why is important we get the 2nd

 

[super_city_si]

Don hutchison for stones “theres definite contact but its not a penalty” huh?

 

[IcriedwhenTueartleft]

Ridiculous decisions from Brooks...

 

[hateutd]

a much better Mahrez in second half....

 

[Bluewars]

**** is a dipper

Sorry Blue, slight correction!

Correction or translation? Same to me.

 

[Eccles Blue]

COME ON CITY, COME ON CITY. COME ON JOHN BOY. SHOW ‘EM ALL.