PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Centurions said:
Maybe it's because the first three are all UEFA fines and our 115 charges are from the PL and they haven't completed the process yet?
Click to expand...
simpsons-joke.gif
 
mrbelfry said:
Alternatively everyone else is clearing the books to "remove" any leverage City might seek out. If this is City's doing then we've seriously misjudged how explosive the claims are. No one seems to really care about these stories
Click to expand...
That’s because it’s not us.

Put our name instead of Chelsea’s yesterday and you have everyone demanding to see what we accepted wrong doing for. With briefs straight away from the usual suspects that the PL clubs are putting pressure on the PL to investigate.
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
They don’t under the concept of being innocent until proven guilty. Their beloved family man Ryan had charges against him which went to court and then withdrawn from his accuser, same with Mendy. The whole world were desperate to see him jailed and life taken away from him because of who he played for.
Click to expand...
The newspaper of record The Times has called for the suspension of due process in City’s case. Ycnmiu.
 
mrbelfry said:
An £8m fine suggests something significant - everyone foams about our £10m CAS fine. Definitely have no trust in the PL or the cartel owners and of course I think the 115 charges are 100% bad faith charges - I doubt any of the other clubs though are likely to get charged with acting in bad faith towards us which is the only way the letter to CAS can be interpreted in my opinion
Click to expand...
Plus this UEFA sanction against Chelsea dates back to 2012. So are the PL going to start their own investigation against Chelsea going back 11 years? Why are City selected out for special treatment? The PL are acting in bad faith.
 
west didsblue said:
Has that **** Nick Harris done a trophy table with asterisks against Chelsea and United yet?
Click to expand...
He hasn’t got time for that, he must spend 10 hours a day blocking city fans, 10 hours a day wondering how his life became so bitter and angry and 4 hours a day begging somebody to publish his insane ramblings that he’s scribbled on a bit of washed up shipwreck on the lonely Scottish backwater island he lives on.
Before you ask, no, he doesn’t sleep. Nobody who looks like a fucking fella who’s gone toe to toe on an E and red stripe session with frank Gallagher sleeps.
I’m sorry his mrs passed away, genuinely it must be horrible, but this **** gets no sympathy for any aspect of his life from me. City should have taken him, amongst other to the cleaners,
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
They don’t under the concept of being innocent until proven guilty. Their beloved family man Ryan had charges against him which went to court and then withdrawn from his accuser, same with Mendy. The whole world were desperate to see him jailed and life taken away from him because of who he played for.
Click to expand...
Not the same with Mendy. That went to trial and he was found not guilty.
 
give it to gordon said:
Are some of these charges for allegedly breaching of rule that didnt exist at the time ?
Click to expand...
I think it's to do with the fact that the PL rushed through rules that effectively let's them go on a fishing trip and demand that clubs supply them with anything and everything they request regardless of relevance. These rules didn't exist when we're alleged to have broken the rules so we're arguing that we'll only give them what they would have been due before the new rules. Basically, they want us to do thier job for them and tie the noose ourselves.


Maybe...
 
west didsblue said:
Has that **** Nick Harris done a trophy table with asterisks against Chelsea and United yet?
Click to expand...
It really does expose the level of organised hate against MCFC. The pile on against city is unparalleled in sport. 2023 and you are not allowed to have a Muslim owner. Don’t matter if he regenerates half of east Manchester.

Shirt not red.
Owner not white.
New money v old.

There is an awful smell embedded into top level sport.
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
They don’t under the concept of being innocent until proven guilty. Their beloved family man Ryan had charges against him which went to court and then withdrawn from his accuser, same with Mendy. The whole world were desperate to see him jailed and life taken away from him because of who he played for.
Click to expand...
Do you mean Greenwood rather than Mendy?
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
I do wonder, if we're found to have not breached rules, what our reaction would to to those reporters who have tried to destroy this club these last few seasons. It's quite personal to me tbh.
Click to expand...
They will do a Tebas, insisting that City are guilty and the panel is not fit for purpose. More worryingly, the PL know this and will be tempted to find City guilty to appease the redshirts and their sycophants.
 
Asa's left peg said:
So if the Chelsea charges go back to 2012, can someone give me a total of charges over the period to the takeover? I'm sure it must be somewhere in the press.
Click to expand...
Same as the Rags, no indication they were being investigated, no list of failures or charges, just a statement and token fine after they were found to be guilty of breaking the rules with the press desperate to include the words “minor breach” re the Rags even though no ne knows the figures
 
wolviedinho said:
It really does expose the level of organised hate against MCFC. The pile on against city is unparalleled in sport. 2023 and you are not allowed to have a Muslim owner. Don’t matter if he regenerates half of east Manchester.

Shirt not red.
Owner not white.
New money v old.

There is an awful smell embedded into top level sport.
Click to expand...

Shirt not red
Owner not white
Means all our trophies
Are a pile of shite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top