Ehm? Wouldn't criminal charges be a breach of his contract, though? He was not available for us. Surely it's somewhere in every professional athlete's contract? How are we the ones liable for his losses? He can sue the ones responsible for the situation.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Benjamin Mendy | Joins Pogon Szczecin (p92)
- Thread starter awest
- Start date
Ehm? Wouldn't criminal charges be a breach of his contract, though? He was not available for us. Surely it's somewhere in every professional athlete's contract? How are we the ones liable for his losses? He can sue the ones responsible for the situation.
Ehm? Wouldn't criminal charges be a breach of his contract, though? He was not available for us. Surely it's somewhere in every professional athlete's contract? How are we the ones liable for his losses? He can sue the ones responsible for the situation.
Surely it's the women who brought the charges? Not a legal expert by a long stretch...
Johnny Mars Bar
Well-Known Member
Surely it's the women who brought the charges? Not a legal expert by a long stretch...
The police decide whether to charge someone and the CPS decide whether to prosecute.
All a member of the public can do is make a statement.
Nobody “presses charges” or “brings charges”. It’s not a thing.
Thanks for clarifying!The police decide whether to charge someone and the CPS decide whether to prosecute.
All a member of the public can do is make a statement.
Nobody “presses charges” or “brings charges”. It’s not a thing.
Man_City_Loyal
Well-Known Member
Ehm? Wouldn't criminal charges be a breach of his contract, though? He was not available for us. Surely it's somewhere in every professional athlete's contract? How are we the ones liable for his losses? He can sue the ones responsible for the situation.
I'm sure it was said in an article last year if he was found NG there he would recoup all of his salary he's had frozen at city
Ehm? Wouldn't criminal charges be a breach of his contract, though? He was not available for us. Surely it's somewhere in every professional athlete's contract? How are we the ones liable for his losses? He can sue the ones responsible for the situation.
What is in his contract is that if he was found guilty and sentenced to 3 months or more in custody then he can be sacked.
That obviously didn't happen, and there would have been a lot of time when he wasn't on remand or on trial when City could have, in theory, played him. The same with Adam Johnson, they played him right up to the trial and the CEx had to resign over it, and it would have been a reputational disaster if City played him.
Johnny Mars Bar
Well-Known Member
Thanks for clarifying!
I’m not a lawyer or anything it’s just one of those really annoying American phrases that have somehow infected our language.
neilhb
Well-Known Member
Didn't City make provision in their accounts for this eventuality? I seem to recall it being mentioned in another thread. In any event City will no doubt negotiate a settlement/payoff, taking into account missing playing time.
Johnny Mars Bar
Well-Known Member
Didn't City make provision in their accounts for this eventuality? I seem to recall it being mentioned in another thread. In any event City will no doubt negotiate a settlement/payoff, taking into account missing playing time.
The fucker was robbing a living even before he didn’t rape someone.
We should be the ones suing the **** for claiming he was a footballer on his CV.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
How match fit do you think he would have been once released from remand for breaching his bail conditions?I’m afraid as ridiculous as it is if he was available then he has a case - obviously if we had selected him we would have been slaughtered by all and sundry - I imagine we will just settle it and move on.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
How do you know what was in his contract? Does being in remand for 134 days(?) not count?What is in his contract is that if he was found guilty and sentenced to 3 months or more in custody then he can be sacked.
That obviously didn't happen, and there would have been a lot of time when he wasn't on remand or on trial when City could have, in theory, played him. The same with Adam Johnson, they played him right up to the trial and the CEx had to resign over it, and it would have been a reputational disaster if City played him.
franksinatra
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 11,149
I was at the Lorient friendly on saturday and they made 6/7 subs but Mendy never made it onto the pitch.How match fit do you think he would have been once released from remand for breaching his bail condition?
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Ehm? Wouldn't criminal charges be a breach of his contract, though? He was not available for us. Surely it's somewhere in every professional athlete's contract? How are we the ones liable for his losses? He can sue the ones responsible for the situation.
One of the comments claims that the rags showed how it's done by continuing to pay Greenwood regardless...
The comments in general just shows why Twitter is such a waste of time.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
There is also the issue of repeated lockdown parties which was were a breach of club rules. I would imagine City will just have to pay up to the end of his contract which would have been budgeted for.How do you know what was in his contract? Does being in remand for 134 days(?) not count?
Centurions
Well-Known Member
I'm no lawyer but I can't see it myself, maybe a part payment but I'm not sure if even that is due him.There is also the issue of repeated lockdown parties which was were a breach of club rules. I would imagine City will just have to pay up to the end of his contract which would have been budgeted for.
No as he wasn't found guilty.How do you know what was in his contract? Does being in remand for 134 days(?) not count?
It is a standard term of PFA contract which they are all based on.
Shame it had to beThanks for clarifying!