You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Michael Olise | Bayern Munich Player
- Thread starter decmancity
- Start date
TheBlueCat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 1,757
Nothing out of the ordinary in a player not be required to move if his release clause is activated. Definitely not unusual, it would be ridiculous if he ‘had to accept a move,’ could end up anywhere! Some top source..
Honestly don’t know how these people get paid for such rubbishNothing out of the ordinary in a player not be required to move if his release clause is activated. Definitely not unusual, it would be ridiculous if he ‘had to accept a move,’ could end up anywhere! Some top source..
Oh wait he works for the Guardian - makes more sense now
Seems like if City were really interested they'd gone in by now.
Nothing out of the ordinary in a player not be required to move if his release clause is activated. Definitely not unusual, it would be ridiculous if he ‘had to accept a move,’ could end up anywhere! Some top source..
Pretty certain it'd be classed as modern slavery if a player was forced to move clubs against his will. Such a strange thing for Aarons to point out
TheBlueCat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 1,757
He’s clearly just wrong matePretty certain it'd be classed as modern slavery if a player was forced to move clubs against his will. Such a strange thing for Aarons to point out
He’s clearly just wrong mate
Well he's not wrong, he's just not employing critical thinking and making a bigger deal about something that's standard.
TheBlueCat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 1,757
He is wrong - states that it is unusual. It isn’tWell he's not wrong, he's just not employing critical thinking and making a bigger deal about something that's standard.
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 31,835
Seems like if City were really interested they'd gone in by now.
Maybe waiting to check on his hamstring recovery? No team has gone for him it seems
Barcon
Well-Known Member
“complicated by some slightly unusual terms set by player. They include Olise being able to turn down a move even if the clause is triggered“.
Quite possibly some of the dumbest shit I have ever heard.
Quite possibly some of the dumbest shit I have ever heard.
Inter Me Nan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 11,167
Matchday thread 'Hold my beer!'.“complicated by some slightly unusual terms set by player. They include Olise being able to turn down a move even if the clause is triggered“.
Quite possibly some of the dumbest shit I have ever heard.
Kamaro011
Well-Known Member
Makes sense if Michael Olise is like Rice wants to move only to London club and will not entertain any move outside London. So even we triggered the clause he will refuse.
I can see him doing that, him not doing celebration whenever he scores a goal can be very telling. The guy is weird and i will not be surprised he make weird decision to turn down City and joining Chelsea instead.
I can see him doing that, him not doing celebration whenever he scores a goal can be very telling. The guy is weird and i will not be surprised he make weird decision to turn down City and joining Chelsea instead.
May depend upon how serious the injury is, I read yesterday that Woy Hodgson said it was the worst possible scenario for a handstring.Seems like if City were really interested they'd gone in by now.
Olise also could not settle in Manchester when he was with us, so that could well be a factor.
Tugay One Cup
Well-Known Member
Olise also could not settle in Manchester when he was with us
Wasn't he 13?
Though he was older but not 100% certain.Wasn't he 13?
Dribble
Well-Known Member
He was only with us for a season IIRC. I think he was about 18/19 when we released him, & he was signed by Reading.Wasn't he 13?
He ended up becoming the Championship young player of the season & made it into the team of the season too.
After one season, Palace nipped in & took him to Selhurst Park...
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 70,005
I’d assumed that all players with a release clause had the option of turning down a club even though their release clause had been activated.“complicated by some slightly unusual terms set by player. They include Olise being able to turn down a move even if the clause is triggered“.
Quite possibly some of the dumbest shit I have ever heard.
Sir Joe Aguero
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 3,440
He’d flourish here, we should be all over him.He was only with us for a season IIRC. I think he was about 18/19 when we released him, & he was signed by Reading.
He ended up becoming the Championship young player of the season & made it into the team of the season too.
After one season, Palace nipped in & took him to Selhurst Park...
bumbleblue
Well-Known Member
They must do. People can’t believe players are moved against their wishes.. seems mad to me.I’d assumed that all players with a release clause had the option of turning down a club even though their release clause had been activated.
G
G
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Guest
they do.I’d assumed that all players with a release clause had the option of turning down a club even though their release clause had been activated.