NowInMilnrow
Well-Known Member
Actually it's how MUFC themselves described it, and the media were happy to take their word for it of course, no investigation required.Tongue in cheek….that’s how they described the Rags breaches.
Actually it's how MUFC themselves described it, and the media were happy to take their word for it of course, no investigation required.Tongue in cheek….that’s how they described the Rags breaches.
The 1.6b was drip fed into the club even after FFP.Were we not told that the forced Abramovich sale wrote off £1.5bn of loans (from him)? That money may have been injected before ffp but, if it was still on the book as a liability at point of sale, surely that is very much a major influence on whether they pass the rules now..?
Whichever way you look at it the 1.6b was effectively nearly a million pounds a week over Abramovich’s tenure. That money was used to prop up the club by covering wages, transfers and operating expenses. It also didn’t attract interest as it was a soft loan, for FFP purposes a non tangible PIK should have been applied at Commercial rates. The Rags have been paying a lot of interest on their debt, by Abramovich loaning the money for free they’ve once again circumvented FFP.It makes no difference to FFP, which is the only aspect that cares about owner investment.
FFP views any investment in the same way - whether a loan or not.
If FFP didn't view a loan the same as investment, an owner could loan 500m now, spend 500m on the team and have it not count. That's not what happens.
Whichever way you look at it the 1.6b was effectively nearly a million pounds a week over Abramovich’s tenure. That money was used to prop up the club by covering wages, transfers and operating expenses. It also didn’t attract interest as it was a soft loan, for FFP purposes a non tangible PIK should have been applied at Commercial rates. The Rags have been paying a lot of interest on their debt, by Abramovich loaning the money for free they’ve once again circumvented FFP.
That'll have them in a sweat.. or not, as the case may be..City have requested officially for Prince Andrew to independently investigate the claims due his vast experience with them.
This dickhead also said that Haaland had signed for the wrong team. Fuck what he thinksJust two examples in the MEN today.
It’s every fucking day.
![]()
![]()
This dickhead also said that Haaland had signed for the wrong team. Fuck what he thinks
Actually it's how MUFC themselves described it, and the media were happy to take their word for it of course, no investigation required.
This dickhead also said that Haaland had signed for the wrong team. Fuck what he thinks
Still not a single word from Panja, Delooney, Harris or Castles about Chelsea. Almost as if they’re not interested unless it’s City or Newcastle…
Chelsea investigated over payments to offshore companies
Premier League investigation comes after new owners self-reported the club regarding a number of financial transactions made during Roman Abramovich era
exclusive
Still not a single word from Panja, Delooney, Harris or Castles about Chelsea. Almost as if they’re not interested unless it’s City or Newcastle…
Just going to say the same. No agenda there then.This dickhead also said that Haaland had signed for the wrong team. Fuck what he thinks
That’s because he’s a thick twat.This dickhead also said that Haaland had signed for the wrong team. Fuck what he thinks
The BBC refering to the charges at Manchester City as ? concrete charges such as those facing Manchester City
Chelsea: Premier League investigating potential financial breaches by Blues
The league are now looking at whether concrete charges, such as those facing Manchester City and Everton, are appropriate.
![]()
Chelsea: Premier League investigating potential financial breaches by Blues
The Premier League is investigating potential financial rule breaches by Chelsea.www.bbc.co.uk
If he says szjob... Slobzj.....errr, that Hungarian's name, you'll need more than a rain cape!And, tbf, it is a worrying verdict. We should all be worried he is off his fucking rocker.
He's totally incompetent. What the hell does he mean by "concrete charges." He appears to have had no media law training at all and his content seems to be published on the BBC website without any editorial checks. The story doesn't even make sense.Stone. Need we say anymore.