It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because Akanji was bought for 15m. Even if he didn't work, it was not a big deal. For 80-90m, you expect a starter at the very least. I don't think Eze or Nunez are better than Kovacic, Bernardo, Foden, KDB or Rodri. There are better midfielders out there, and plenty around their level that would cost much less.

The problem is, we are too late in the transfer market, with KDB's injury and lack of depth, so there is an urgent need of bringing someone. A position you never want to be in.
I'd include Palmer in that list too.
 
That doesnt make sense? They are both different players so why would they be on the same list? Nunes is a CM/DM , Eze is a left wing / AM.

Not sure what profile player City are looking for we’ve gone from Bellingham to Rice to Paqueta to Olmo to Barella to Wirtz to Eze to Nunes, they all bring different skill sets what do we want a number 6 number 8 or a 10
 
Sky keep saying we are going to have to pay £100m for Eze or Nunes!!!!

Biggest bullshitters in football. How do they get away with this crap reporting?

City won’t be spending £100m ffs

The three currently on are pure bollocks merchants.

Darmesh saying Ten Haag has been hard done by the rags - how much has the **** spent on shite players already ?
 
Not sure what profile player City are looking for we’ve gone from Bellingham to Rice to Paqueta to Olmo to Barella to Wirtz to Eze to Nunes, they all bring different skill sets what do we want a number 6 number 8 or a 10
no bluemoon transfer committee went from
Bellingham to Rice to Paqueta to Olmo to Barella to Wirtz to Eze to Nunes,
 
Sky keep saying we are going to have to pay £100m for Eze or Nunes!!!!

Biggest bullshitters in football. How do they get away with this crap reporting?

City won’t be spending £100m ffs
To appease the red scousers and rag masses who hang on every word the cnuts spout,surprised they haven’t added a negative slant as well as in over paying for a squad player and similar bollocks ..
 
I’ve seen it mentioned that Wolves would want at least £60m now but their owners also need cash? Palace would be £70-80m imo but we were going to do that on paqueta anyway?
£60m for either would be great business.

it’s ok for Sky to think it’s nothing but these clubs will have shareholders and will need to take any bid seriously. All this end of window price increase is bullshit.

Every single player is now £100m?? Hahahahah. It’s just not real life.

With Bernie onboard we don’t need to panic into a signing imo. If wolves and palace don’t want to sell then fair play to them. City will have a fee in mind as will both the clubs we want to buy from. Somewhere in the middle a deal could be made.

The rest is the media trying to actively encourage clubs not to sell to city. They need the moneybags tag to continue.

City executives know the score. Any player we target due to our success would run to Manchester. Especially the players we target are not necessarily seen as world class. It’s a huge opportunity for someone to play at the top with a top team. Many won’t get the call.
 
Last edited:
Sky keep saying we are going to have to pay £100m for Eze or Nunes!!!!

Biggest bullshitters in football. How do they get away with this crap reporting?

City won’t be spending £100m ffs
All I see on their app is utd this utd that blah blah blah all about the takeover.
Sky sports always put a positive story on about the red mardarses, after all the negativity with the woman beater they've had to run something to stop their 600billion fans from turning over.

And for the record I'd have Eze in a heartbeat, he has a footballing brain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top