PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Phil1 said:
I think in life if cunts are out to get you then you bring every bit of back up you can to put it right. Yeah it’s not ideal when it comes to football and if we’ve done wrong then we are fair game. If we haven’t Though..,
Click to expand...

Yep and like I said footballs a dirty game off the pitch nowadays!
 
meltonblue said:
Right but that can work both ways and that’s exactly why people might have an issue with it. If Newcastle for example (whose deal I will always argue should never have been allowed) had charges on them for something and went diplomatic about it, then being completely honest I’d be saying that’s one of the key reasons why they shouldn’t have allowed them to buy it in the first place.

I completely get it in terms of complete distrust in the PLs motives for bringing the charges in the first place. I just think there’s other ways to combat that than anything diplomatically, that to me should be a last resort and I don’t think we should be near there yet or ever have to be really.
Click to expand...
Sorry pal, you're very naive. Newcastle are state owned it's not an argument. City aren't, if you can't see the difference between the two ownership models then I don't know what to say. As for last resort, are you joking? The PL are trying to destroy Manchester City, and the name of it's owner. Wake up and smell the fucking grass mate, you're living in cuckoo land.
 
Last edited:
So let me get this right……

Rich & powerful clubs lobbied football in Europe & the premier league with threats of damaging their future economy, are concerned that a rich & powerful nation has lobbied the UK government with threats of damaging their future economy……

It’s amazing how these wordsmiths can get the masses throthing. I sometimes think the world would be a better place if we’d never learnt to read & write. (You can see by my spelling & punctuation why I’m in that camp)
 
meltonblue said:
Right but that can work both ways and that’s exactly why people might have an issue with it. If Newcastle for example (whose deal I will always argue should never have been allowed) had charges on them for something and went diplomatic about it, then being completely honest I’d be saying that’s one of the key reasons why they shouldn’t have allowed them to buy it in the first place.

I completely get it in terms of complete distrust in the PLs motives for bringing the charges in the first place. I just think there’s other ways to combat that than anything diplomatically, that to me should be a last resort and I don’t think we should be near there yet or ever have to be really.
Click to expand...

Good post. Surely the elite team of lawyers we have can prove our innocence without trying to throw our unquestionable political weight around so to me it’s worrying that we’re doing so.

I can’t wait for all of this to be over
 
The Shallyman said:
Yeah, but if the Abu Dhabi Government contacted the British government, in order to influence an ongoing investigation or to make it go away, then that doesn't look very good, does it?

Especially if we are adamant that City are not state owned, so why is the Abu Dhabi government getting involved in a football matter?

If the intention was to have their day in court, you wouldn't be knocking on the door of number 10, as some people on here have mentioned, threatening to cancel Billions of investment.

If that is the case, then the charges have to have some merit.
Click to expand...
Crickey! I assume you support Trump in his denouncement of the deep state.
 
SilverFox2 said:
In a recent post you highlighted King Charles as a business partner to our owner. I think it involved land used for wind farms for electricity generation.
We should be proud that Sheikh M has contacts so important as The King.

Pretenders in the form of our Club enemies can only dream of such connections as they dream of winning the treble.
Click to expand...
I have no recollection of mentioning Charlie.
 
Disco Danger said:
Good post. Surely the elite team of lawyers we have can prove our innocence without trying to throw our unquestionable political weight around so to me it’s worrying that we’re doing so.

I can’t wait for all of this to be over
Click to expand...
Our lawyers are in the elite class precisely because they are adept at using anything to their clients advantage.
 
Disco Danger said:
Good post. Surely the elite team of lawyers we have can prove our innocence without trying to throw our unquestionable political weight around so to me it’s worrying that we’re doing so.

I can’t wait for all of this to be over
Click to expand...

It's not over until we say it's over redshirt. Rags already fined for breaking ffp and the rest of you will get yours. Just like taking us on on the football field it's a fight you will ultimately lose. Your bullying toadying days are over.
 
The Shallyman said:
Yeah, but if the Abu Dhabi Government contacted the British government, in order to influence an ongoing investigation or to make it go away, then that doesn't look very good, does it?

Especially if we are adamant that City are not state owned, so why is the Abu Dhabi government getting involved in a football matter?

If the intention was to have their day in court, you wouldn't be knocking on the door of number 10, as some people on here have mentioned, threatening to cancel Billions of investment.

If that is the case, then the charges have to have some merit.
Click to expand...
You're a fishy fella you know. Just looking back over your posts, very few are actually about City and most are in the un*ted thread. Just sayin......
 
Rammy Blue said:
Unless I’m missing something @The Shallyman quite clearly states he’s a LFC fan so not sure why people keep calling him a rag?
Click to expand...

It should be added to their usernames so nobody is in any doubt. Seriously though some of us, myself included, will have missed the post(s) where he's said he's dipper. I just call them redshirts now to be on the safe side as that covers 99% of them.
 
The Shallyman said:
Yeah, but if the Abu Dhabi Government contacted the British government, in order to influence an ongoing investigation or to make it go away, then that doesn't look very good, does it?

Especially if we are adamant that City are not state owned, so why is the Abu Dhabi government getting involved in a football matter?

If the intention was to have their day in court, you wouldn't be knocking on the door of number 10, as some people on here have mentioned, threatening to cancel Billions of investment.

If that is the case, then the charges have to have some merit.
Click to expand...
You know what “doesn’t look very good”?

Scheduling a trophy parade on the anniversary of Heysel.

Throwing a glass full of coins at a teenage girl, hospitalising her.

Smashing up and spitting on everything in site, even when you’ve fucking won.

Players wearing Suarez t-shirts after he’s been done for racism.

Hacking IT systems.

Being ashamed of nothing, yet offended by everything.

Fuck off back to the Miseryside forums and enjoy Thursday night football you sad ****.
 
The Shallyman said:
Yeah, but if the Abu Dhabi Government contacted the British government, in order to influence an ongoing investigation or to make it go away, then that doesn't look very good, does it?

Especially if we are adamant that City are not state owned, so why is the Abu Dhabi government getting involved in a football matter?

If the intention was to have their day in court, you wouldn't be knocking on the door of number 10, as some people on here have mentioned, threatening to cancel Billions of investment.

If that is the case, then the charges have to have some merit.
Click to expand...
You are piss can and I claim my fiver
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top