EricBrooksGhost
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 2,783
, along with buying up Russian oil .
Why would they do that?
, along with buying up Russian oil .
Come on. Does he even need a sniff, Rags or Dippers?With which you conveniently ignore the point once again..
Sheikh Mansour owns ADUG (which of course owns City), he is also the VP of the UAE, deputy to his brother Sheikh Mohamed. He is also deputy PM of the UAE, with the ruler of Dubai as PM. To try and suggest that he has no input in the foreign policy of the UAE is desperate.
The UAE is openly supplying Russia with microchips and chemicals to manufacture munitions, along with buying up Russian oil and precious metals, which is of course their right, it’s their economy to protect at the end of the day, but as said in the original post, it shouldn’t be taboo to acknowledge that for all the amazing things he has done for City and Manchester itself, it is hard to defend the foreign policy he is part of as the #2 of the UAE.
My whole point was aside from the "non-cooperating" BS everything else relates to reducing debt, reducing expenditures, and over stating revenues all in the name of presenting a false accounting of our books so that we could circumvent FFP...View attachment 95648A large number of the charges are prior to FFP being introduced in the PL which forbid club to make more than £105m loss over three seasons and restricted the amount that the wage bill could increase by, this one was dropped when it affected the rags
Beginning with the 2013/14 season, Premier League clubs cannot make a loss in excess of £105 million total across a three season period. Additionally, clubs will be restricted in terms of the amounts of Premier League Central Funds that can be used to increase player wages
And that's the point. As I understand it the PL review our submissions and grant the licence on behalf of UEFA. If we've deceived them, via our financial submissions then, by definition, we've potentially provided false figures for FFP.This would be very strange indeed since the PL have granted us a licence to play in the CL every season since 2011-12 .
Not for the first time has this bugger stood out like a sore bellend.Come on. Does he even need a sniff, Rags or Dippers?
Unless he’s Conn, he’s defo a red top.Not for the first time has this bugger stood out like a sore bellend.
Would that shock you ? No me neither. ;)Unless he’s Conn, he’s defo a red top.
Yes, it's almost like a prime minister of UK having a wife who has a company that deals with Russia. It would be a very poor show.Sheikh Mansour is the deputy PM and vice President of the UAE.
To suggest that he has no input on the foreign policy of the UAE is with all due respect laughable.
Not even worth the effort Oakie me old fruit.Not for the first time has this bugger stood out like a sore bellend.
A sizeable number of Russians don't recognise Ukraine as anything other than part of Russia, as it had been for hundreds of years, for them Ukraine is just a difficult Russian province that broke away with the support of western imperialists, when Mother Russia was temporarily weakened by the fall of the Soviet Union.
Morality concerns the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour. So Putin could, at a stretch, ask "what could be more right for a Russian patriot than to make Mother Russia whole again?" But it would be a very big stretch. For Ukrainian self determination to have currency in Russia, it would require Putin and others to recognise Ukraine as an independent sovereign nation, but for many Russians Ukraine is not a sovereign nation, it is simply part of Russia, history shows that, so self determination is a moot point, it is not applicable and consequently so is any question of right and wrong.
Self-determination denotes the legal right of people to decide their own destiny in the international order. Self-determination is a core principle of international law, arising from customary international law, but also recognised as a general principle of law, and enshrined in a number of international treaties.
So if the Russian majority in those parts of Ukraine presently occupied by Russian forces decided, in a free and fair vote, to join Russia are you okay with that? Or perhaps the fact that Russia first invaded and drew arbitrary lines to gerrymander such a majority would invalidate such a vote? But then Russia considers Ukraine's borders as entirely arbitrary anyway! So down the rabbit hole we go.
I'll tell you what self determination is, it's the ability to draw a line on a map, hold the territory within it, and the people inside the lines to freely call it their own, and you need, and this is most important, powerful allies at your back to support you, that's what the Ukrainians are fighting for. it's what Kurds want too, except they don't have the ability to draw those lines and no powerful friends to help them.
It's all very well talking about "legal rights of people", you have to be recognised as a distinct people first by countries with clout, that's why Pep did this....
A small step, but an important one that Catalan is recognised as an EU official language.
To create a nation state and to hold it together in the face of external and internal threats to its existence is no small feat, ask the Israelis. The ideal state is one of unified purpose, and if not then consent and at the very least compliance, but be under no illusion, a young state exists only if powerful external forces support its existence. Right now that support for Ukraine is under strain and we will see over the coming months just how strong that support is, and if Ukraine folds for lack of support it'll all be down to geopolitics. Right and wrong, questions of morality, they're all points of discussion, but there are no absolutes here.
PS: Perhaps you could start a thread about the moral position of the United States in September 1939, or August 1914.
Needs to be on a Nottingham train mate. ;)Not even worth the effort Oakie me old fruit.
Probably drag on,surprised something hasn’t come out after the arsenal loss as in a leak of some sort waffling again about stripping club of titles bollocks or something,all about disrupting..Does seem a bit odd that this has gone very quiet. Has it been sorted behind closed doors or is this timescale of it taking years actually right?
Uefa apparently had a “strong” case and subsequently banned us from competing in Europe until CAS declared that stolen, spliced emails did not reflect reality. So no disguised owner investment.This process dragging on for years definitely isn't a good thing for the club. As it stands it's just 'there' in the background constantly and no matter how many times we say it's all bollocks it doesn't change that.
As there are only a small number of core charges once you strip out the multiple non cooperation ones you'd expect that it could be completed within a year. If it isn't my feeling would be that the PL are confident that they have a very strong case against us.
Is it possible that even if we are found to be 100 percent not guilty that it will then go away?This process dragging on for years definitely isn't a good thing for the club. As it stands it's just 'there' in the background constantly and no matter how many times we say it's all bollocks it doesn't change that.
As there are only a small number of core charges once you strip out the multiple non cooperation ones you'd expect that it could be completed within a year. If it isn't my feeling would be that the PL are confident that they have a very strong case against us.
History tells you that Genocide, followed by the deliberate supplantation of loyal, convenient idiots does not equal legitimacy
Scotland says hi.What does it equal? A vassal state? Like Belarus? Belarus exists because Russia allows it to exist as a subservient vassal state. This war might very well mean that even that token independence will be wiped away and the country subsumed into Russia.
Ukraine is paying the price of flirting with NATO and EU membership, it didn't want the Belarus model, no Finlandisation for Ukraine, fair enough, then as night follows day it was inevitable that Russia would invade.
That is not a justification of the Russian invasion, just an explanation of how the world works, has always worked. Small countries join NATO for that very reason, they cede their defence and a chunk of their foreign policy to a big beast for the comfort of knowing its a deterrence to another big beast on their doorstep.
The same principles are being played out in an elaborate game of chicken in the South China Sea.
This war might be dripping with the language of sovereignty and legitimacy, but that's just for show, power politics through the millennia tells you that when a young weak state borders a resentful powerful one, they better do one of two things, find powerful friends and quick or bow their head.
To have and to hold, or not.Scotland says hi.