Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
I suppose it all depends on the quality of the other candidates as his defence is purely based on comparing his LinkedIn profile with that of the successful applicant which may or may not be accurate. I’ve been turned down, or not even invited to interview, for many roles down the years despite having the perfect match for an advertised job. Sometimes the role changes once CVs are received too. If they’ve selected candidates from a diverse range then I doubt he’ll be successful and I’m not sure what he could claim anyway, surely he wouldn’t want the job now. Weird world we live in now, though, very litigious.
I used to run an Engineering Help Desk of about 25 people for a company called Alphameric, we installed and maintained EPOS systems mainly to betting shops but also Abbey National and Reuters News Agency.

If we ever had an application that said “I support/follow Man United” it went straight in the bin and I couldn’t even be arsed replying to them.
 
I used to run an Engineering Help Desk of about 25 people for a company called Alphameric, we installed and maintained EPOS systems mainly to betting shops but also Abbey National and Reuters News Agency.

If we ever had an application that said “I support/follow Man United” it went straight in the bin and I couldn’t even be arsed replying to them.
Yeah I'm glad I don't need to be on interviewing or selection panels now. In the old days we used to pick the one we thought would fit into the team best and I was very good at it but now it's a minefield. I definitely never disregarded anyone for being a rag though. Honest, guv!
 
The Athletic caters for rival fans, not City fans, exhibit #26128
I'm hearing ya!

"Why does nobody mention the charges when reporting on City?" cry the usual insecure fanbases.

"For just 50p a month we'll tell you what you want to hear regardless of the facts' replies the Athletic.

PS: There aren't any reports that don't mention the charges no matter what you read or subscribe to.
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.
 
Yeah I'm glad I don't need to be on interviewing or selection panels now. In the old days we used to pick the one we thought would fit into the team best and I was very good at it but now it's a minefield. I definitely never disregarded anyone for being a rag though. Honest, guv!
Just to add, I do always advise people not to disclose their football team until they are in the job. Or choose a small local team as they might take pity on you.
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.
Their self-importance and self-awareness are at extreme opposites of the spectrum.
 
Yeah I'm glad I don't need to be on interviewing or selection panels now. In the old days we used to pick the one we thought would fit into the team best and I was very good at it but now it's a minefield. I definitely never disregarded anyone for being a rag though. Honest, guv!
The odd one slipped through the net but I honestly employed an openly gay guy for a Receptionist job which at the time was almost an exclusively female position because he made me laugh so much in the interview. He was a funny guy and a great asset to the company and his colleagues.

One Monday he brought some post into an office I shared with three female colleagues and said in his best “mincing” voice, “ oh girls, I’ve been so unwell over the weekend, it’s that time of the month again”. You just couldn’t be miserable with him around, he brightened up the place.
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.

No victim mentality there then.
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.

It's like 1st April every time spitty says something. Why would City worry about a team with one Premier league title * in 33 years ?
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.

No mention of the Dippers hiring our staff, hacking our scouting system and orchestrating a dirty tricks campaign.. I think his analysis is rather flawed - as ever.
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.
Scousers don't buy the Sun*
.... but this one will happily write for the Torygraph.
Hypocritical twat.

*tbf the one action that stopped clock of a fanbase do get right.
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.
Whatever Jamie, all I can remember is you and your media arse-licking buddies manufacturing some kind of faux rivalry which City fans couldn’t give a toss about, though I suppose it has worked to some extent as we’ve “shared” the last five titles between us!
 
Just to add, I do always advise people not to disclose their football team until they are in the job. Or choose a small local team as they might take pity on you.
Same here. Even when I am in my job I try not to disclose it. And thats because I live near a load of lfc fans. I have had them threaten my car, threaten me, I have taken all badges off my car because it just attracts them, they hate City more than anything (Though we're not their rivals!).

Same with builders, plumbers, carpet fitters etc. They see our Maine Road signs and scarves etc and the comments start to come out. Not all fans are like that but there are always some twats.
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.

For which read " Chelsea and City recognised that any decent Liverpool player would be looking to move to a better club"
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.
Im not sure whats more unbelievable that carragher can write or that scousers can read
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.
Remember when Chelsea targetted us for SWP - they knew the writing was on the wall.

FFS - he's a right dick.
 
I suppose it all depends on the quality of the other candidates as his defence is purely based on comparing his LinkedIn profile with that of the successful applicant which may or may not be accurate. I’ve been turned down, or not even invited to interview, for many roles down the years despite having the perfect match for an advertised job. Sometimes the role changes once CVs are received too. If they’ve selected candidates from a diverse range then I doubt he’ll be successful and I’m not sure what he could claim anyway, surely he wouldn’t want the job now. Weird world we live in now, though, very litigious.
The fact that he wanted to work for Liverpool FC makes you question his mental health
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.
Projection from Liverpool PR team right there.

They love a good victim story to use.
 
Carragher in the Telegraph, goodness me:

'A peculiarity of all the most recent high-profile, mega-billionaire takeovers is how quickly new owners seem to have Liverpool in their sights.

Both Chelsea and Manchester City were preoccupied with targeting Liverpool after receiving history-changing investment, eager to make a statement about a power shift at the top of the English game.

Those feuds instantly grew on and off the pitch, with Chelsea having the resources to keep trying to sign our captain Steven Gerrard as they began to collect trophies, and City continuing the pattern by luring Raheem Sterling from Anfield.'

Pre-occupied with targeting Liverpool apparently.

John Henry net worth - $5.1 Billion.

Tom Werner net worth - $1.7 Billion.

Lebron James net worth - $1 Billion.

People need to stop acting like Liverpool don't eat at our end of the dinner table. They still have a significant advantage over most of the league.

Also, nobody is preoccupied with targeting a team that has won the Premier League once since its inception in 1992.

Greece won the Euros in 2004 but we arent calling them a football super power.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top