cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,871
Harris using @Prestwich_Blue as one of his sources there!
Fucking grass ;-)
Harris using @Prestwich_Blue as one of his sources there!
Wow, he's got 200 subscribers. Impressive.
If I have one piece of advice for Stefan (and for anyone else interested) it is this (embellished of course): “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their blinkered opinion without really listening to you, garner support from other blinkered idiots and beat you with whataboutery”
Don't wish to link to any more of his tweets (Harris), but I see he's posted this (see attached image) claiming it to have been sent to him by means of direct message in 2022, from a City supporting lawyer who worked for the club.
View attachment 108412
Hmmm! begin a sentence with But, great education certainly not of my generation, from a lawyer he say's.Don't wish to link to any more of his tweets (Harris), but I see he's posted this (see attached image) claiming it to have been sent to him by means of direct message in 2022, from a City supporting lawyer who worked for the club.
View attachment 108412
Even then it’s not what wins it for the PL. PL do not win by showing City engaged in aggressive but compliant accounting.Should be a doddle for the PL to prove it then. Or it's useless speculation.
“I think it’s likely….” without backing it up with any evidence whatsoever.Don't wish to link to any more of his tweets (Harris), but I see he's posted this (see attached image) claiming it to have been sent to him by means of direct message in 2022, from a City supporting lawyer who worked for the club.
View attachment 108412
“I think it’s likely….” without backing it up with any evidence whatsoever.
Seriously, is that it? Personally, I think it’s likely that none of that came from a former City employee turned whistleblower and Harris either made it up or saw it posted elsewhere by someone speculating to what may have happened.
“I think it’s likely….” without backing it up with any evidence whatsoever.
Seriously, is that it? Personally, I think it’s likely that none of that came from a former City employee turned whistleblower and Harris either made it up or saw it posted elsewhere by someone speculating to what may have happened.
Even then it’s not what wins it for the PL. PL do not win by showing City engaged in aggressive but compliant accounting.
I saw this posted on rawk - they regard Harris to be some journalistic powerhouse - and, although I won't bother linking his tweet, he states before it:Don't wish to link to any more of his tweets (Harris), but I see he's posted this (see attached image) claiming it to have been sent to him by means of direct message in 2022, from a City supporting lawyer who worked for the club.
View attachment 108412
I saw this posted on rawk - they regard Harris to be some journalistic powerhouse - and, although I won't bother linking his tweet, he states before it:
"I've spoken to multiple MCFC / CFG employees & former employees since 2014 who are not comfortable with City's behaviour. I have zero need to protect this person's anonymity but will anyway. If you want to ID yourself and try to justify this, then please do. You know who you are."
If I have Stefan's Twitter correct - this must have been referencing him because Slbsn then responds:
"Sad move to attempt to bully or seek to embarrass me by tweeting my pure speculation at what a given Der Speigel email may mean when we were very periodically on DM years ago.I hope you have better sources/whistleblowers than me as I was never an employee, have no access to any confidential information at all and last worked for the club as a financial (not legal) adviser (not an employee as you claim) in 2007. Everything I say is opinion, analysis or speculation from the outside. So whatever you think you get by making this attack I think you will be sadly disappointed. I certainly have no need to justify anything. You are the one that claims to have the inside sources. You’ve just blown your own credibility if you consider me a source."
He's not taken Stefans schooling of his bullshit well.
Reading further down he's going down the MASSIVE innuendo route. Let alone mocking Stefans point.
The fella is obviously way out of his depth here. He's like the bloke in the pub that wants to fight every fucker after they've gone home.
What an absolute bellend. He got his arse handed to him by Stefan on the podcast, but straight back to mouthing off on Twitter after the podcast is released. He’s probably seen the reaction from the podcast and doesn’t like the fact that Stefan wouldn’t allow him to spew his conspiracy theories.I saw this posted on rawk - they regard Harris to be some journalistic powerhouse - and, although I won't bother linking his tweet, he states before it:
"I've spoken to multiple MCFC / CFG employees & former employees since 2014 who are not comfortable with City's behaviour. I have zero need to protect this person's anonymity but will anyway. If you want to ID yourself and try to justify this, then please do. You know who you are."
If I have Stefan's Twitter correct - this must have been referencing him because Slbsn then responds:
"Sad move to attempt to bully or seek to embarrass me by tweeting my pure speculation at what a given Der Speigel email may mean when we were very periodically on DM years ago.I hope you have better sources/whistleblowers than me as I was never an employee, have no access to any confidential information at all and last worked for the club as a financial (not legal) adviser (not an employee as you claim) in 2007. Everything I say is opinion, analysis or speculation from the outside. So whatever you think you get by making this attack I think you will be sadly disappointed. I certainly have no need to justify anything. You are the one that claims to have the inside sources. You’ve just blown your own credibility if you consider me a source."