PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

If you didn’t know who Harris was and had listened to the Podcast, you wouldn’t believe that the follow up tweets came from the same person.

It has to be for the money. He can play the investigative journo card all he wants but he’s not after any kind of justice. It’s all about the clicks and the likes to put food on the table, which is fine, a man’s got to do what a man’s got to do. I think he can see that this City gravy train (which has fed his family for 10+ years) is coming to its final destination and he is trying to drain every penny from it before it comes to a complete stop.

Beans (value brand) on toast soon for Mr Harris, while reminiscing how good he has had it because of City. We are his favourite club.
It’s truely bizarre behavoiur and just shows Harris as what he is. He’s timid on that podcast and has nothing to offer in regards to insight when sat next to Stefan and in the presence of someone with actual knowledge and experience of how these things work.

He’s a pure internet troll and the last 24 hours show that more than ever.
 
Don't wish to link to any more of his tweets (Harris), but I see he's posted this (see attached image) claiming it to have been sent to him by means of direct message in 2022, from a City supporting lawyer who worked for the club.

View attachment 108412
Does anyone actually believe that’s genuine?
 
He's an absolute barmpot. How can he have a civilised discussion with someone then hours later go on social media and turn everything around!!

I hope that other podcasts have noted what a bitter and twisted bellend this character is and stay well away. He's absolutely delusional.
Typical of someone who knows they can only have a chance to ‘debate’ when they have time to consider what they’re writing, and put in the odd ‘witty’ retort, when it came to it on the podcast (which was excellent btw Stefan), he was shown to be limited (at best) when required to think on his feet in response.
 
If thats a real - I have a DM from another City legal person who contacted me a long time ago. I would of course at all costs protect their anonymity.

"Hi *******
Its unfortunate but there's really no evidence to prove that City did anything wrong. The contractual arrangements are made out and complied with in full. City have provided the receivables documentation at CAS regarding Etihad's incomings and the full amounts are accounted for, admittedly not all from the same source however there is no proof there was anything untowards. The DS emails tentatively suggest a course of conduct that the paperwork just doesn't support. City complied with all the rules and a) There's nothing to prove otherwise, b) The auditors found nothing wrong. City will argue their case vigorously with supporting documentation. Any alternative position would need unequivocal supporting evidence that doesn't appear to exist."
 
Imagine being Harris, your whole life dominated by city, waking up every single day being bitter and twisted, his pain must be constant, I bet he never ever smiles, all because of us, wonderful.

& yet unemployed. He’s created a whole persona as a Football Financial Investigative journalist, the best team in the world are facing 115 charges & he still is unable to get a job.

What a pathetic ****…..
 
Did I hear right in that Podcast he claims he has 200 paying users on his Sub-stack? And he points the finger at City for massaging financial figures.
He went on about that a little longer than I felt comfortable with. Like when you ask somebody “you alright?” And they take that as an opportunity to tell you the ins and outs of a hospital visit. He had to be interrupted in the end.

I did think he had some points. Stefan seemed to be saying that even if his points were true you need a lot more proof than that. If City can show bank transfers it doesn’t matter what an email says. The emails on their own, on the face of it, sound strange particularly the one that came out after CAS.

My guess is we have cut some corners perhaps but it’s a sledgehammer to crack a nut and, unless there is a smoking gun, little actual evidence to support the theories.
 
Harris is plumbing new depths now with this totally unprovoked, unjustified and personal attack on Stefan. He's just flailing around at this point.

Next stop for Harris - the Arsenal Supporters Trust for a public masturbation session about what could happen if the charges are upheld. All very above board and not slanderous in any way I'm sure.
It's weird isn't it.

Let's pretend Arsenal are on track for a historic Premier League/Champions League double (stop sniggering at the back).

Their supporters trust are getting together and need an agenda/topic for their meeting in order to make it productive, worthwhile, and encourage supporters to attend.

But rather than ride the wave of current form, talk about what the club is doing so well, future plans, they want to talk about.........City.

Don't forget though, no-one cares about City. They'll tell you that at every available opportunity.
 
He's an absolute barmpot. How can he have a civilised discussion with someone then hours later go on social media and turn everything around!!

I hope that other podcasts have noted what a bitter and twisted bellend this character is and stay well away. He's absolutely delusional.
I had no issues with him on the podcast, didn’t agree with what he said on most points and clearly he wasn’t as clued up on other points as he likes to portray. That being said, he has an opinion that he is entitled to and it’s good to get differing opinions on things.

What’s clear from the follow up tweets is that he knows his audience. Going on to social media and writing what was discussed on the podcast and in the context it was discussed, is not what his red followers want to hear and believe. He is chasing the £ and the easiest way for him to get it, is to smear City, because that’s what the dozy red cunts want.

If City offered him a job, his opinion changes in an instant.
 
He's not taken Stefans schooling of his bullshit well.



Reading further down he's going down the MASSIVE innuendo route. Let alone mocking Stefans point.
The fella is obviously way out of his depth here. He's like the bloke in the pub that wants to fight every fucker after they've gone home.

Didn't this idiot get rejected out of court as not being a specialist in football finance? Fancy trying to tell a lawyer he is wrong. Also he's come out at night again, probably had a few drinks after watching us smash Luton
 
He's not taken Stefans schooling of his bullshit well.



Reading further down he's going down the MASSIVE innuendo route. Let alone mocking Stefans point.
The fella is obviously way out of his depth here. He's like the bloke in the pub that wants to fight every fucker after they've gone home.


Why didnt harris post clips of him getting his arse ripped and prove Harris was lying lol
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top