Russian invasion of Ukraine

Enemy channels are talking about the consequences of a Ukrainian attack today against military infrastructure in occupied Crimea using missiles and drones

The information has not been verified and Ukraine has not yet made any statements.

According to the enemy at least three Ka-52 helicopters were allegedly damaged at the airbase near Simferopol. And also, it seems, there is a hit on a military object within the city limits, where many victims among officers are allegedly recorded.

It is also suggested that an air defense radar was damaged in Saki.

We are waiting for official information.
 
Enemy channels are talking about the consequences of a Ukrainian attack today against military infrastructure in occupied Crimea using missiles and drones

The information has not been verified and Ukraine has not yet made any statements.

According to the enemy at least three Ka-52 helicopters were allegedly damaged at the airbase near Simferopol. And also, it seems, there is a hit on a military object within the city limits, where many victims among officers are allegedly recorded.

It is also suggested that an air defense radar was damaged in Saki.

We are waiting for official information.
Assume Russian air defence capability is non existant ??
 
Assume Russian air defence capability is non existant ??

They have been systematically destroying it for months, it is why them A50s have had to operate further forward and as a result getting shot down. Ukraine are in no position to take Crimea but they are doing a brilliant job at weakening it and forcing the black sea fleet to withdraw.
 
They have been systematically destroying it for months, it is why them A50s have had to operate further forward and as a result getting shot down. Ukraine are in no position to take Crimea but they are doing a brilliant job at weakening it and forcing the black sea fleet to withdraw.
In your view, taking Crimea in the short term or never?
 
"Ah, NATO troops must be doing some overtime on their days off, just like my guys did in Eastern Ukraine and Crimea when we invaded."

My mate in RLC is posted to Poland for an unspecified amount of time apparently. Not spoke to him for a few weeks though so might have actually been told how long now.
 
My mate in RLC is posted to Poland for an unspecified amount of time apparently. Not spoke to him for a few weeks though so might have actually been told how long now.
I know there are a couple of major ex's ongoing.

One started in the UK, landed by sea in Germany, and is advancing into Poland currently, there's a major river crossing in a few days, and it finishes close to the Belarus border. It's also being supported by air assets.

There's also a major NATO ex off the Norway coast, involving air and sea from several countries.
 
In your view, taking Crimea in the short term or never?
it’s a huge undertaking. I think it may still need to be ultimately sacrificed, even if Ukraine takes back all it had in 2021. Ukraine may actually need to sacrifice a tiny bit more, but only after Russia has been further reduced and given cause to reflect. They cannot profit from this egregious act. They cannot ever reflect and think any of this was worth it.

I think that sort of resolution would represent as fair and just peace as is possible. A humiliated Russia would be a dangerous animal, as would be an emboldened one. It’s a really difficult line to tread.
 
Ukrainian naval drones have become even more deadly, - Business Insider.
▪️
They can carry a load of up to 860 kg! This is almost twice as much as the combat unit of Iskander.
▪️
The range of use has increased to 950 km.
▪️
They want to make them reusable in order to use them again
 
I know there are a couple of major ex's ongoing.

One started in the UK, landed by sea in Germany, and is advancing into Poland currently, there's a major river crossing in a few days, and it finishes close to the Belarus border. It's also being supported by air assets.

There's also a major NATO ex off the Norway coast, involving air and sea from several countries.
The large exercises for show, the smaller ones (which we don’t hear about) for effect.
 
From "The Analyst":

EUROPE FINALLY GETS IT AS MAJOR MOVES TO AID UKRAINE UNFOLD

President Macron of France, no longer facing the pressure of reelection as his second term enters its second half, has suddenly become motivated to press far harder for aid for Ukraine.
Germany has been in quiet negotiations with India for artillery shells. Czechia has led a consortium to acquire 800,000 shells - the Canadians and Dutch have already agreed to finance most of it.
In an unprecedented move, as the EU struggles to meet its commitments to Ukraine, it’s been agreed to use EU money to buy shells from outside of the EU. Countries with sizeable reserves are being approached to supply some of what’s needed as European industry gears up.
The problems for the European industry are a mirror of what’s happened in America. Post Cold War the industrial base shrank so much and so far, expanding it by 100% is still nowhere near where it needs to be. It’s like going from extra small to small with the aim of trying to reach medium in reasonable time, when what’s needed is three sizes bigger and needs to be XXL.
Yet finally, those problems are recognised. Not only that but what’s also been recognised is that Ukraine needs aid now. Even if America turned the taps on tomorrow and surged supplies, there’s limited capacity in Poland, to force such quantities through the system and get it to the front lines in Ukraine. It will take at least a month to six weeks.
There’s also a growing acceptance in the Biden Administration that dithering about on ATACMS, GLSDB and even more Abram’s and Bradley’s
has finally been put to one side.
The new aid package when it’s passed - and it will be eventually, is going to see some juicy new weapons that are going to make the Russians deeply unhappy. $61 billion is a lot of money- and it’s going to make a difference.
The Macron statement that if it got far enough he would send French troops into Ukraine to make sure Russia doesn’t win, pretty much caused a meltdown in some capitals. Several reacted quickly - including America - saying that’s never going to happen - with their troops - but Russia leapt on the declaration. Of course they would - it played into their propaganda that Russia has always been fighting NATO. Yet by saying it in many ways, Macron almo6st said, ‘well you’re always saying it’s already happening, so what if were true!’ Which forced the Kremlin to say it would open up a war with all of NATO - a war it says it’s already fighting - so it totally undermined their stupid propaganda argument.
As I said after Davos and Munich, the lobbying, advice, the knowledge so many of us have tried so hard to get leadership across Europe to accept as fact, is getting through. The fall of Avdivka and the death of Navalny somehow crystallised the realities for them. Trump with his stupid NATO statements a couple of weeks back, added to that feeling.
The EU has never seen itself as ‘power’. Its is not a United States of Europe and nowhere near it. But it is a community of democratic trading nations that realises it has to be more. Its unity of purpose when it comes to Russia is growing stronger by the day. It wants Ukraine as part of its future - it’s a mutually beneficial prospect that excites everyone - the reconstruction post war will be intense and vast.
Even the Toad of the Balkans, the odious and corrupt Victor Orban, said yesterday that he doesn’t want a border with Russia. 1956 and the soviet suppression of a democratic uprising in Hungary hasn’t been forgotten. Even he knows Ukraine is better intact even for Hungary. And one cannot help but think if Orban is starting to see that Russia can’t be allowed to win. He’s got almost everything he wanted from NATO and the EU. Maybe now he knows which side his bread is buttered.
There has been a turning of the tide in European capitals. A resilience is building. Democracy takes time to react - far too long - but never underestimate its capacity to act when it decides it must. CONTINUES..
CONTINUES:…
The late 2022 offensive when Ukraine retook Kherson and the Kupiansk area made it seem like they would quickly defeat Russia. It acted as a stop on urgency. The offensive last year created a stalemate that stuck. The fall of Avdivka has shattered any illusions - the Russian offensive and Ukrainian withdrawals have crashed through any remaining reticence.
The Europeans are finally awake.
 
A small question: how to define "Russia win"? If the war is frozen in the current situation, should it be called "Russia win", "Russia lose", or "Russia draw"?
 
I accept your sentiments but it’s more complicated than that.
You say it is but I'm not convinced. The man doesn't have unlimited resources so he would have to back off. The only time he's ever going to go nuclear is if boots end up on the ground marching for Moscow and even then I'm not convinced it will happen. Beat them down, knock out their ships and planes, take the Ukrainian land back, boot them out of Kaliningrad and then fortify the NATO borders with Russia.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top