TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 38,158
- Team supported
- Manchester City
"City boil teams. Even when a goal down you see them simmering until they turn it up so much the opposition are poached..."
Lol it's probably so they can orchestrate the attack.
Preferable to being a wife beater…If you turned on to watch the game after 8 mins you’d be excused for thinking Rashford was a fucking panel-beater who won a competition to play not a world beater.
There was a shot on MOTD when mainoo got hit by the ball in the head end of first half. The rags were all bent over blowing out of their arses. I was calm yesterday as I knew we’d break them eventually"City boil teams. Even when a goal down you see them simmering until they turn it up so much the opposition are poached..."
Well if it was Anthony…Preferable to being a wife beater…
I'd go with comically bad. The shocking bit is that we only scored three.That’s a possibility. But it’s hardly a reasoned, objective or balanced scoring system. United were shockingly bad in that second half yesterday.
Arrests?Two well attended, orchestrated attacks - how many arrests ?
I suspect the lenses are an incorrect prescription. But he probably prefers to see his football with much of the action out of focus.He is a massive bellend. Wears glasses to try and look "smart" when he's actually as thick as pig shit.
On toast?"City boil teams. Even when a goal down you see them simmering until they turn it up so much the opposition are poached..."
We had 27 shots, 37 crosses, and 11 corners in 98 minutes. Their penalty area was like a pinball machine. But apparently they were compact and "set up well." I know we live in a post-truth society but some of the media comments seem to come from a parallell universe!
Eggsellent! although I'd prefer to see them scrambled."City boil teams. Even when a goal down you see them simmering until they turn it up so much the opposition are poached..."
Miss those guys, they were incredible.
I allowed myself to get sucked in with the line of EIGHT PAGES OF THE DERBY and bought an MUEN. The eight pages are shared - 4-4! Wouldn't the Rags have loved that scoreline? First billing is the Rags, despite the fact that we won and it was our home game. Page 1 for Stretford is headlining Trashford's screamer. Our headline is Erling missing a sitter!We had 27 shots, 37 crosses, and 11 corners in 98 minutes. Their penalty area was like a pinball machine. But apparently they were compact and "set up well." I know we live in a post-truth society but some of the media comments seem to come from a parallell universe!
Didn't yer watch carefully - the Rags were scrambling all over their penalty area and resembled at the end, although I've not actually seen the phenomenon, a dozen headless chickens.Eggsellent! although I'd prefer to see them scrambled.
Some wonderful players thereMiss those guys, they were incredible.
It should have been at least 5-1If we hadn't have got stung and shook by that freak Rashford goal, we would have scored 5+ today.
Rags in work trying to smokescreen the result by going on about Erling's miss.
My reposte "80 goals in 84 appearances isn't too shabby now is it"
"Oh and you're fuckin shite"