Leicester charged by PL for failing PSR

I don’t know if the charges all these clubs face are different to ours, I can’t get that invested in it, but the more I see it all happening the more I can see us just walking away with nothing happening to us at all.

It’s all a fucking farce.
Very different. Forest, Everton, and Leicester have all been charged with breaching profit and sustainability rules - spending beyond their means as the Premier League sees it.

City have essentially been accused of fraud. Basically we've not merely been charged with overspending, we've been charged lying to the PL and submitting false accounts in order to circumvent PSR rules.
 
I don’t know if the charges all these clubs face are different to ours, I can’t get that invested in it, but the more I see it all happening the more I can see us just walking away with nothing happening to us at all.

It’s all a fucking farce.

The main difference is that the Leicester, Everton, Forest charges are based on their own submissions, so it's a fairly non-controversial charge based on agreed numbers.

It's like you've given your kid a £10 note and told them they can only spend £8 but they have come home with only £1 of change.

Whereas in our case we came home with the £2 but we're being accused of cadging a fiver off our mate. And we're saying "prove it".

This is the best piece of legal sports analysis you're likely to see today.
 
I don’t know if the charges all these clubs face are different to ours, I can’t get that invested in it, but the more I see it all happening the more I can see us just walking away with nothing happening to us at all.

It’s all a fucking farce.

The premier league couldn’t have made a bigger fuck up than they have. By the time they’ve finished every club that’s been in the premier league will have points deducted or will have paid millions in fines to subsidise the premier league cartel or the PL OFFICIALS barring OF COURSE the twats like Arsenal, Liverpool and United.
 
The main difference is that the Leicester, Everton, Forest charges are based on their own submissions, so it's a fairly non-controversial charge based on agreed numbers.

It's like you've given your kid a £10 note and told them they can only spend £8 but they have come home with only £1 of change.

Whereas in our case we came home with the £2 but we're being accused of cadging a fiver off our mate. And we're saying "prove it".

This is the best piece of legal sports analysis you're likely to see today.
Lend us a fiver
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top