Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
IMG-0847.png
Never a penalty
 
There’s a dipper fan who pops up on my twitter every time I open it even though I don’t follow him, John o Sullivan. He has a lot of followers

After the last round of the CL he was saying that the Europa League is more exciting this year LOL

Another favourite of his which I predict he’s saying tonight is - I didn’t even know city were playing tonight as no one cares about them.
Yet 50% of his tweets are about us
Corbally Red (****)
 
Headline in the Daily Telegraph...
"Real Madrid stun Man City before Foden limps off in Champions League classic"

Seriously that's the headline!

Blimey did we lose in the end?
I'm very confused...
 
Last edited:
The Mirror.

Headline and first 4 articles about Arsenal.
Then a big add.
Then another article about Arsenal, and 1 article about City.

IMG-0850.png


IMG-0851.png
 
Real Madrid: Lunin (5), Carvajal (6), Tchouameni (6), Rudiger (7), Mendy (6), Valverde (7), Kroos (6), Camavinga (7), Bellingham (6), Vinicius Jnr (8), Rodrygo (7).

Total 71

Man City:
Ortega (6), Akanji (5), Gvardiol (7), Dias (6), Stones (6), Rodri (6), Kovacic (6), Silva (7), Foden (8), Haaland (6), Grealish (6).

Total 69 - edited lol

We went to Madrid, the world's biggest team, the 14 time champions and based on sly sports ratings above were 2nd best and got a 3-3 draw.

Always pandering. Always lying.
 
Last edited:
Real Madrid: Lunin (5), Carvajal (6), Tchouameni (6), Rudiger (7), Mendy (6), Valverde (7), Kroos (6), Camavinga (7), Bellingham (6), Vinicius Jnr (8), Rodrygo (7).

Total 71

Man City:
Ortega (6), Akanji (5), Gvardiol (7), Dias (6), Stones (6), Rodri (6), Kovacic (6), Silva (7), Foden (8), Haaland (6), Grealish (6).

Total 67

We went to Madrid, the world's biggest team, the 14 time champions and based on sly sports ratings above were 2nd best and got a 3-3 draw.

Always pandering. Always lying.
Yeah, just thought I'd check- Adam Bate. Usually gives Foden 5 for England, absolute moron, stealing a living.
 
More negative headlines, this time from Ladyman. And the Daily United want people to pay (m+) to read that shit.

When will I actually see a positive headline and article about City drawing 3-3 away at Real Madrid?

If that was Liverpool or United(ha!), there would numerous positive articles about the performance and the result.

Sloppy, slow, careless….

View attachment 113508

That’s a shocking viewpoint of an absolute classic between the current holders & 14 time champions.

The stats show we controlled the game away at the Bernabau & knocked them out last season after an away draw.

CBFE29B0-9531-4CAC-A1D3-A3A289072724.jpeg
 
Real Madrid: Lunin (5), Carvajal (6), Tchouameni (6), Rudiger (7), Mendy (6), Valverde (7), Kroos (6), Camavinga (7), Bellingham (6), Vinicius Jnr (8), Rodrygo (7).

Total 71

Man City:
Ortega (6), Akanji (5), Gvardiol (7), Dias (6), Stones (6), Rodri (6), Kovacic (6), Silva (7), Foden (8), Haaland (6), Grealish (6).

Total 69 - edited lol

We went to Madrid, the world's biggest team, the 14 time champions and based on sly sports ratings above were 2nd best and got a 3-3 draw.

Always pandering. Always lying.
And yet the stats say we controlled the game with much superior possession. Gvardiol 8, Silva 8, Grealish 8, Akanji 7.

Total 73.
 
That’s a shocking viewpoint of an absolute classic between the current holders & 14 time champions.

The stats show we controlled the game away at the Bernabau & knocked them out last season after an away draw.

View attachment 113523
Where's the whinging at the ref stat ?

RM 90% City 10%
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top