PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Think this is best you will get from CAS judgement.View attachment 115229
I still can't believe the balls that Burnley flopped onto the table during that period. Sticking their oar right in. Fucking Burnley!!!!!
How very dare they.
And Wolves, dont think that I don't see you shiftily mooching around in the background!!
 
I still can't believe the balls that Burnley flopped onto the table during that period. Sticking their oar right in. Fucking Burnley!!!!!
How very dare they.
And Wolves, dont think that I don't see you shiftily mooching around in the background!!

I think the wolves owner bowed out of the plot after pressure from wolves fans ( who had received similar vitroil from efl teams when climbing£ their way into the prem)
 
this is great from Pep but no one has thought about what he said, what if we are found not guilty? What will you say then are Sky, Talksport and the media going to apologise .

what I dont understand that nobody has gone with the story that City may be not guilty and this is a stich upp , there is actualy more proof out there of that then there is of City guilt I havent heart about anything other then the 6 email and the very one sited Der Spiegel stories.

Why doesnt somebody take a chance it is a big chance that the biggest story in the history of english footbal is realy that City is not guilty or at least not profen guilty and this is a stitch up from Liverpool/United/Arsenal , and that all the cheating is not City but the other clubs trying to take City out with mate up charges.

Like Pep says we now know that the UEFA charges were never going to be profen so why did they ban us and why doesnt somebody talk about how unfair it was . The proof is in CAS
That won't get clicks. Simple
 
I still can't believe the balls that Burnley flopped onto the table during that period. Sticking their oar right in. Fucking Burnley!!!!!
How very dare they.
And Wolves, dont think that I don't see you shiftily mooching around in the background!!
Burnley owned by yanks, believe its a dodgy hedge fund thing that's placed/loaded all the debt on Burnley, like what them Glazers done at Trafford
 
I still can't believe the balls that Burnley flopped onto the table during that period. Sticking their oar right in. Fucking Burnley!!!!!
How very dare they.
And Wolves, dont think that I don't see you shiftily mooching around in the background!!
Don't forget Newcastle who're now a victim of what they supported before they came into filthy Arab oil money. :‐)
 
Best yet, some whopper has managed to bring us into the Gateshead row. We really have melted football in England.
 

Attachments

  • 1000006084.jpg
    1000006084.jpg
    227.9 KB · Views: 438
Just seen this on Facebook. We are getting blamed for the 115 beaches now. Some turnip even liked the comment. LOL
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240422-110511_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20240422-110511_Facebook.jpg
    26.8 KB · Views: 268
this is great from Pep but no one has thought about what he said, what if we are found not guilty? What will you say then are Sky, Talksport and the media going to apologise .

what I dont understand that nobody has gone with the story that City may be not guilty and this is a stich upp , there is actualy more proof out there of that then there is of City guilt I havent heart about anything other then the 6 email and the very one sited Der Spiegel stories.

Why doesnt somebody take a chance it is a big chance that the biggest story in the history of english footbal is realy that City is not guilty or at least not profen guilty and this is a stitch up from Liverpool/United/Arsenal , and that all the cheating is not City but the other clubs trying to take City out with mate up charges.

Like Pep says we now know that the UEFA charges were never going to be profen so why did they ban us and why doesnt somebody talk about how unfair it was . The proof is in CAS

You seriously think anyone in the press/media have the balls to write that view point ?
The press/media are owned by yanks or an Australian. The red shirts are yank owned.
The press/media are told what to say and to support fellow Americans by the owners of the press/media companies.

The thought of City being innocent isn't good for their businesses
 
this is great from Pep but no one has thought about what he said, what if we are found not guilty? What will you say then are Sky, Talksport and the media going to apologise .

what I dont understand that nobody has gone with the story that City may be not guilty and this is a stich upp , there is actualy more proof out there of that then there is of City guilt I havent heart about anything other then the 6 email and the very one sited Der Spiegel stories.

Why doesnt somebody take a chance it is a big chance that the biggest story in the history of english footbal is realy that City is not guilty or at least not profen guilty and this is a stitch up from Liverpool/United/Arsenal , and that all the cheating is not City but the other clubs trying to take City out with mate up charges.

Like Pep says we now know that the UEFA charges were never going to be profen so why did they ban us and why doesnt somebody talk about how unfair it was . The proof is in CAS
Same with the lfc/City rivalry.. They were more concerned with printing anti - City poison than covering what has been the pinnacle of football.
 
You seriously think anyone in the press/media have the balls to write that view point ?
The press/media are owned by yanks or an Australian. The red shirts are yank owned.
The press/media are told what to say and to support fellow Americans by the owners of the press/media companies.

The thought of City being innocent isn't good for their businesses

Who remembers them wanking themselves silly that the club was going to get a 2 year Champions league ban. Then that lovely sunny morning in July 2020 it got put in the bin by CAS? Sky Sports were reporting outside the Etihad and the reporter looked like someone had ran over his dog and shagged his mrs when he had to feedback that news to the studio. You think the media would hedge their bets learning from that experience, it doesn’t create a captive audience which is why non of them are doing it.
 
On the football daily last night they were absolutely appalled that Forest could accuse pgmol & bring the integrity of the game into question…… 115

It seems it perfectly ok to question the integrity without evidence for some & lobby & smear but not all…… 115

Surely if pgmol have nothing to hide they should meet with Forest & maybe allow them to conduct whatever investigation they want, access to accounts of theirs & 3rd parties….. 115

Everybody knows…….. 115
 
It might well have been... Andy Burnham pledges support to ensure Manchester City are treated the same way as Everton and Forest.

He thinks the average footy fan is thick.
They are thick....ask a sample of even proper match going fans about FFP, 115 etc.....no fucking idea.

The only difference is regular match attendees done believe everything in the media as most have seen their own clubs shafted in one way or another.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top