The Album Review Club - Week #196 (page 1316) - Aja - Steely Dan

Still listen to OK Computer and The Bends to this day.The only tracks i skip are Fitter Happier and Climbing Up The Walls.
Glastonbury when they headlined and did most of the stuff from OK and The Bends was an iconic set.
All downhill after bar There, There track from Hail to the Thief.
9/10.Poetry in motion
I'll defend A Moon Shaped Pool until I die. Probably prefer it to the Bends to be honest. It doesnt have any of the big highs like the Bends but maybe because I'm older I just want less noise :) it also feels like the most of its time album (after Pablo Honey) and I think that ages it
 
Last edited:
I'm lactose intolerant.

But the pie order should be cancelled, because I just barely made it through "Exit Music (For A Film)" and recalled why I dislike this record so much.
Sheesh man i absolutely love this song. It's kind of fragile but masculine at the same time - like a Russian man wearing a tutu atop an iceberg. I love the atmosphere of it. Yes it's contrived and constructed but it's made so well
 
Sheesh man i absolutely love this song. It's kind of fragile but masculine at the same time - like a Russian man wearing a tutu atop an iceberg. I love the atmosphere of it. Yes it's contrived and constructed but it's made so well
It's unbearably whingy, tuneless, hookless, slow, arid like a desert, pointless, ugly and vague.

It's horrifying. All that rock and roll should never be.

In my opinion. :)

If he'd written a line that said "like a Russian man in a tutu atop an iceberg" it'd at least be a simile worth discussing.
 
Still listen to OK Computer and The Bends to this day.The only tracks i skip are Fitter Happier and Climbing Up The Walls.
Glastonbury when they headlined and did most of the stuff from OK and The Bends was an iconic set.
All downhill after bar There, There track from Hail to the Thief.
9/10.Poetry in motion
How can a 9/10 record have songs you skip? You skip 17% of the tunes!

This is kind of my point about "overrated". At the least, it seems grade inflation.

If this is how I scored records, I have like 683 10/10s.

Sorry mate -- I don't mean to be harsh. Maybe it's just me, but any record with songs I'd skip is a 7 at best.
 
Last edited:
We're not even a day into this pick and it's doing my head in. Not the album itself which has some merits if you park it's cynicism and lack of authenticity. But because I've been reminded of the absolute torrent of garbage that is written about it and the associated baggage that comes with it; such as unanswerable questions like why is Jonny Greenwood lauded to the heavens when someone like Dominic Miller is ignored? Why do people say the lyrics and themes are prescient or profound but when you ask them to explain a bit more they can't actually articulate any proper detail? Why can't Thom Yorke be arsed to follow an idea through to a cogent conclusion? When did absorbing a few influences and bringing them together sometimes successfully sometimes not, constitute "reinventing rock"? I don't hate this album (at least not for purely musical reasons) but I do hate all the arseholes with a 2:2 in English Lit from Keele or wherever, who wrote rainforests worth of total shite about it.

It's put me in a foul enough mood to score it now. If I was scoring this purely as a few pieces of music I'd probably give it a 6 maybe a 5 because theres some interesting ideas on it with some decent playing; but i've been told plenty of times this is in effect an important piece of art. So it's getting scored as such and it's getting compared in terms of it's intent and execution against the likes of Guernica. And on that basis it's getting 1/10 because it's devoid of any artistic integrity.

Gonna go and listen to the playlist as I really do need to chill out now.
 
We're not even a day into this pick and it's doing my head in. Not the album itself which has some merits if you park it's cynicism and lack of authenticity. But because I've been reminded of the absolute torrent of garbage that is written about it and the associated baggage that comes with it; such as unanswerable questions like why is Jonny Greenwood lauded to the heavens when someone like Dominic Miller is ignored? Why do people say the lyrics and themes are prescient or profound but when you ask them to explain a bit more they can't actually articulate any proper detail? Why can't Thom Yorke be arsed to follow an idea through to a cogent conclusion? When did absorbing a few influences and bringing them together sometimes successfully sometimes not, constitute "reinventing rock"? I don't hate this album (at least not for purely musical reasons) but I do hate all the arseholes with a 2:2 in English Lit from Keele or wherever, who wrote rainforests worth of total shite about it.

It's put me in a foul enough mood to score it now. If I was scoring this purely as a few pieces of music I'd probably give it a 6 maybe a 5 because theres some interesting ideas on it with some decent playing; but i've been told plenty of times this is in effect an important piece of art. So it's getting scored as such and it's getting compared in terms of it's intent and execution against the likes of Guernica. And on that basis it's getting 1/10 because it's devoid of any artistic integrity.

Gonna go and listen to the playlist as I really do need to chill out now.
Brilliant commentary. I would guess my review and score will be somewhat more focused on the musical content now that you’ve articulated your feelings.

But I share your perspective on the inherent naked cynicism of this product and your mystification that more fans and critics cannot see what seems obvious to us (especially critics — they’re supposed to know better; some of RH’s more down-in-the-mouth fans are hapless and/or high, and this seems specifically crafted to hit them where they live, so that they’ve been sucked in is just bog-standard consumer research executed precisely).

I ascribe this cynicism in part to stupidity (the artists — I can’t be the only one who thinks Thom Yorke is, I’m sorry, kind of a dim bulb, and his self-knowledge meter appears to be pegged near zero) and greed (much of it corporate).
 
Last edited:
We're not even a day into this pick and it's doing my head in. Not the album itself which has some merits if you park it's cynicism and lack of authenticity. But because I've been reminded of the absolute torrent of garbage that is written about it and the associated baggage that comes with it; such as unanswerable questions like why is Jonny Greenwood lauded to the heavens when someone like Dominic Miller is ignored? Why do people say the lyrics and themes are prescient or profound but when you ask them to explain a bit more they can't actually articulate any proper detail? Why can't Thom Yorke be arsed to follow an idea through to a cogent conclusion? When did absorbing a few influences and bringing them together sometimes successfully sometimes not, constitute "reinventing rock"? I don't hate this album (at least not for purely musical reasons) but I do hate all the arseholes with a 2:2 in English Lit from Keele or wherever, who wrote rainforests worth of total shite about it.

It's put me in a foul enough mood to score it now. If I was scoring this purely as a few pieces of music I'd probably give it a 6 maybe a 5 because theres some interesting ideas on it with some decent playing; but i've been told plenty of times this is in effect an important piece of art. So it's getting scored as such and it's getting compared in terms of it's intent and execution against the likes of Guernica. And on that basis it's getting 1/10 because it's devoid of any artistic integrity.

Gonna go and listen to the playlist as I really do need to chill out now.

C’mon , whilst this is a very good Fog inspired rant 1/10 is disingenuous and ruins the average score. Play fair!
 
why is Jonny Greenwood lauded to the heavens when someone like Dominic Miller is ignored?
I think the same thing almost every day when I look at the 5.27 average you lot dished out to King Swamp - an album on which Dominic Miller played some superb guitar :)
 
C’mon , whilst this is a very good Fog inspired rant 1/10 is disingenuous and ruins the average score. Play fair!
I'm expected threespires to row back on this at some point, but we'll see. This week is already interesting. It seems my Two Tribes post is, so far, very apt.
 
How can a 9/10 record have songs you skip? You skip 17% of the tunes!

This is kind of my point about "overrated". At the least, it seems grade inflation.

If this is how I scored records, I have like 683 10/10s.

Sorry mate -- I don't mean to be harsh. Maybe it's just me, but any record with songs I'd skip is a 7 at best.

In fairness I think it depends on how many songs are on the album and if you skip out of general apathy instead of dislike.

I attempted to listen to the top 100 albums, got just over half way and had to give up. Too many average songs to get through. I would say albums that have nothing but great songs on are very very rare.
 
It's unbearably whingy, tuneless, hookless, slow, arid like a desert, pointless, ugly and vague.

It's horrifying. All that rock and roll should never be.

In my opinion. :)

If he'd written a line that said "like a Russian man in a tutu atop an iceberg" it'd at least be a simile worth discussing.
But apart from that it's amazing
 
C’mon , whilst this is a very good Fog inspired rant 1/10 is disingenuous and ruins the average score. Play fair!

Why is it disengenous ? Were you inside my head last night when I played it twice?

Why when I have been scrupulously fair about every album I've reviewed have I suddenly done this?

Have I fallen under the svengali like influence of Foggy?

I hadn't played or even property thought about this particular album for years prior to yesterday. I have listened to it quite a bit previously and tried to understand why it is so popular. Everytime I did I found myself disliking it a little bit more.

This is not an underconsidered opinion. If we want to discuss it I'm happy to say why I think it exemplifies the worst of the music industry and ironically actually quite a lot about modern life, particularly where the arts have gone in the last three decades but that will bleed into a political conversation that I suspect most want to keep this thread free from.

I will almost certainly never listen to this album again because what this round has done is remind me that all things considered I hate this album. If that's not a 1/10 I don't know what is.

And Rob for the avoidance of doubt I won't be rowing back so you can put my score in now.
 
The Album Review Club

The moment that many have dreamed of.


The current round of albums is due to conclude with a couple of new nominators. The person scheduled for this week’s nomination has asked for another week to put a write-up together. I then put out a call to the last nominator on the list but have so far not received a reply.

This creates a problem because I don’t want to have an end-of-round playlist with just two weeks of the current round to go. Neither do I want to kick off a new round (because I’m not quite ready!)

But then the perfect solution occurred to me. What would be a good way to make a great thread even better? Here are some relevant comments from a few of the music threads:-

“I'm sorry if I inadvertently helped derail the thread but if it does get nominated by someone I look forward to discussing it.”threespires

"Man, if this thread has a "norm" I'm not sure what it is! And that's what makes it great. And if you choose to select the hands-down most overrated record ever made, that would be fine :)." – FogBlueInSanFran

“I cannot think of another group that I have liked and then went downhill so fast.”bennyboy

“It’s all subjective anyway but the ultimate arbiter will be the Bluemoon vote.” – journolud

"Radiohead for me as a young teen was just a great rock/indie band that stood outside the mix of Britpop" – BlueHammer85

Middle-aged gentlemen and slightly older gentlemen, without further ado, I give you:-

OK Computer by Radiohead.


Editor’s Note

Please note that this is a bonus selection, and not my selection. I look forward to listening and reviewing because I’ve never heard it.

In some ways, this subverts the normal process: we take it in turns to put forward a record that means a lot to us, we bare our souls and try to explain how our lives are intertwined with the songs, and we wait for our fellow forumites to agree with us or point out how we have been wrong all these years.

However, Radiohead, and OK Computer in particular, have come up so often in the various discussions that it somehow feels wrong not to listen to this album as a collective. A little sluggishness on the part of some new nominators, plus some intense discussion ahead of the eagerly awaited return of the Bluemoon Cup, have conspired to produce a glorious window of opportunity.

I was too good an opportunity to turn down, like a beautifully arcing Kevin De Bruyne pass that lands invitingly at the feet of a certain goal-hungry Viking.

OK Computer may have regularly featured in the Champions League places of many a post-year-2000 poll, but how will it fare in the harsh crucible of the Album Review Club league table? As @journolud says, “It’s all subjective anyway but the ultimate arbiter will be the Bluemoon vote.”

So, I look forward to applying a bit of science and cool, calm perspective to prove or disprove @FogBlueInSanFran ’s assertion that this is the most overrated album ever made.

I trust that everybody will take their duty seriously and play nice. Having said that, let battle commence.
He he. I had to come back for this. I did wonder who would be brave/daft enough to propose it and it’s you Rob (under the pretence that it’s a filler you never listen to). Yeah right. At least own your passion man ;-).
If I’m honest, I owned it and liked it when released. Don’t play it anymore but have always been startled at the strong reaction to this band on here. I’m off to give it a few listens again and look forward to reading the hatchet jobs er reviews and will put my own analysis and score in.
 
I will 100 percent will come back to this post because this is my central problem with this band: getting super-rich while feeding the masses the hopeless cynicism you know will sell records while blissfully recording the fucking thing in a mansion owned by a B-actress whilst totting up your millions is the ULTIMATE in true cynicism and reckless selfishness. It’s nearly Trumpian.
So should they have a) written songs about surfing or b) recorded the album in a drug den and given all their proceeds to a charity for fallen teens?
 
He he. I had to come back for this. I did wonder who would be brave/daft enough to propose it and it’s you Rob (under the pretence that it’s a filler you never listen to). Yeah right. At least own your passion man ;-).
If I’m honest, I owned it and liked it when released. Don’t play it anymore but have always been startled at the strong reaction to this band on here. I’m off to give it a few listens again and look forward to reading the hatchet jobs er reviews and will put my own analysis and score in.
Honestly, I've never listened to it.

When I do listen to it, I may recognise one or two, but if that's the case, it will have been because I've heard it in the background on TV or film or when out and about.

I'm genuinely looking forward to hearing it for the first time given the poles-apart responses on this thread over the last few years.
 
This is not an underconsidered opinion. If we want to discuss it I'm happy to say why I think it exemplifies the worst of the music industry and ironically actually quite a lot about modern life, particularly where the arts have gone in the last three decades but that will bleed into a political conversation that I suspect most want to keep this thread free from.
Go on then. I’m genuinely interested.
 
Honestly, I've never listened to it.

When I do listen to it, I may recognise one or two, but if that's the case, it will have been because I've heard it in the background on TV or film or when out and about.

I'm genuinely looking forward to hearing it for the first time given the poles-apart responses on this thread over the last few years.
Hmmm. Methinks you do protest too much.

Rob, it’s ok to be open. We are all friends here. The only way to rid yourself of this is to confront it and share it with your pals - as you have done.

Seriously. I’m interested in your first impressions. But really, how could you have avoided this album. It must have been deliberate surely.
 
Hmmm. Methinks you do protest too much.

Rob, it’s ok to be open. We are all friends here. The only way to rid yourself of this is to confront it and share it with your pals - as you have done.

Seriously. I’m interested in your first impressions. But really, how could you have avoided this album. It must have been deliberate surely.
Before joining these forums 4 years ago, the way I've consumed music was:-

1. Read Q Magazine, and in later years, music sites on the internet.
2. Buy CDs based on a combination of these reviews and how they match my tastes.
3. Avoid anything that's overhyped.

Rule #3 is probably the main reason I've avoided it.

The unwritten rule that almost all UK indie is so far below US/Australian rock in terms of quality and execution is also a major factor.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top