Newcastle can still throw the bid out and renew. One more season at Newcastle and then move on......No, they can't. That is the point of a release clause. Kane didn't have a release clause.
Newcastle can still throw the bid out and renew. One more season at Newcastle and then move on......No, they can't. That is the point of a release clause. Kane didn't have a release clause.
Gvardiol had a release clause......No they can't if he has a release clause. We are simply responsible for making the payment to Newcastle that the contract stipulates. There is contract law that clubs have to follow here. They can't just do whatever they feel like. If he doesn't have a release clause then it is a different matter.
No, they can't. They can try and persuade the player not to go but they cannot stop him from leaving if the buying club matches the release clause and the player wants to go.Newcastle can still throw the bid out an renew.
They still can and let him rot for 12 months. Besides that there is no clear evidence he does want toNo, they can't. They can try and persuade the player not to go but they cannot stop him from leaving if the buying club matches the release clause and the player wants to go.
No, they can't. What do you think a release clause is? And why do you think players have them in their contracts?They still can and let him rot for 12 months. Besides that there is no clear evidence he does want to
I don't believe he did. Haaland didGvardiol had a release clause......
Release clauses mean diddly squat.No, they can't. What do you think a release clause is? And why do you think players have them in their contracts?
They really don't. I guess you haven't a clue how they work.Release clauses mean diddly squat.
lolRelease clauses mean diddly squat.
I think he did but it didn't kick in until this Summer so we had to negotiate a fee with Leipzig, Haaland definitely did and we used that, as we did with Grealish.I don't believe he did. Haaland did
Had one for this summer. Still had to negotiate to sign him for 2023-24I don't believe he did. Haaland did
I do but they aren't as simple as you are make them out as.They really don't. I guess you haven't a clue how they work.
Yeah we had to negotiate because the release clause wasn't active yet. If Bruno has an active one for this summer we don't need to negotiate anything with Newcastle we just need Bruno to agree to come.Had one for this summer. Still had to negotiate to sign him of 2023-24
Yes because we didn't want to wait for the RC to kick in and we wanted to negotiate a lower fee than the RC.Had one for this summer. Still had to negotiate to sign him of 2023-24
They really are that simple.I do but they aren't as simple as you are make them out as.
Again we Bruno G isn't a must have signing.....Yes because we didn't want to wait for the RC to kick in and we wanted to negotiate a lower fee than the RC.
Kane didn't have a release clause.Release clause mean very little if the selling club completely ignores said clause. Harry Kane was on up until Spurs completely dissmissed the sale.
I have no idea if we want him (and definitely no idea if we would be willing to pay the amount required by his release clause) or if he wants us.Again we Bruno G isn't a must have signing.....
NopeThey really are that simple.
Not many Premier League club ones....Grealish took its time.Kane didn't have a release clause.
Isn't it strange how many players with release clause's City have signed over the years. Yet apparently you believe they don't mean anything.