Just didn’t know what he meant. Now realise it was reluctance to have to go into it all rather than because his analysis was bad news. My badGood grief. How the fuck did you read that into it ?
Staggering if true (that the PL are attempting to prove this without evidence).That's half the story, isn't it? The first hurdle the PL has to pass is presenting cogent evidence in support of the alleged breaches.
Then they have the second hurdle you explained: trying to make the case that executives of three or four companies are lying in the club's counter evidence.
Seems to me, simply put, that the PL is screwed in both ventures?
We won't clear our name, we will be found guilty of something & even if it's not a major charge, it'll mean that the narrative of City cooking the books will continueI just dont see how there arent any serious repercussion for PL if we win/clear our name. the way they put our club into the dirt, allowing full blown loss or credit in some way, smear campaigns, potential sponsors may never opted to make financial deals with us with this shit hanging over us which they may have done especially with the on pitch success we just had recent years...
I do hope we kept all receipts just in case.
Yeah but we failed to cut the grass.In view of your excellent thread, I think it will be nigh-on impossible for the IC to find that a level of conspiracy took place to the extent that at least half-a-dozen executives lied to auditors, CAS, the FA and UEFA. There is no doubt in my mind that Etihad and Etisalat form the most serious of the allegations against us, so the Premier League will almost certainly require further compelling evidence to what was offered at CAS. Emails alone will surely not meet the standard of proof required.
Much is uncertain, but the careless handling of the bringing of charges against the club (foregoing the courtesy of informing the club before going to the press, coinciding with the government white paper on independent football regulation, stipulating breaches from the wrong handbook, etc), suggests to me that no such additional evidence exists.
Armstrong had all his titles removed. They are trying to set up a similar punishment for us.The Lance Armstrong analogy is the biggest wail of desperation and straw-clutching I've seen. Its another throwaway comment masking how shit other clubs are ran compared to us. Nothing more than that.
It's almost certainly Harris. I quickly checked the two timelines.If i have been reading this correctly it seems this Magic hat or whatever he is called is an Arsenal fan who seems to think he has the inside track on whats going on.
Seems reasonable to assume its the PL lawyer KC Rossen
Deflection one O one.what an asshole
Arsenal chief Edu admits 'there are things that unfortunately mean I cannot say what I feel' about …
![]()
Arsenal chief Edu reflects on the Premier League title race
The Gunners kept pace with Pep Guardiola 's side all throughout the 2023-24 season but were pipped to the title by just two points after a dramatic final day of the Premier League campaign.www.dailymail.co.uk
Well if that’s the best case scenario, it’s all pretty grim.We won't clear our name, we will be found guilty of something & even if it's not a major charge, it'll mean that the narrative of City cooking the books will continue
Yes he took the drugs and knew it was wrong, the City players have done nothing wrong apart from playing amazing footballArmstrong had all his titles removed. They are trying to set up a similar punishment for us.
It's almost certainly Harris. I quickly checked the two timelines.
While you wouldn't hang someone on this evidence, Harris was at Wembley to watch his Southampton team on Sunday. He didn't post until about 11pm that night. Magic Twat's first post on the same day was around 10:40pm. Some coincidence.
As usual I’m none the wiser even after illumination looks to have been provided. Given that we’ve never denied the veracity of the emails - including the ones so thoughtfully provided by the not so mysterious Magic Hat - why does their content seemingly play second fiddle to direct witness testimony, because clearly within those emails club officials (along with Etihad top brass) are making arrangements for someone other than Etihad to pay all bar £8m of the sponsorship deal?That's half the story, isn't it? The first hurdle the PL has to pass is presenting cogent evidence in support of the alleged breaches.
Then they have the second hurdle you explained: trying to make the case that executives of three or four companies are lying in the club's counter evidence.
Seems to me, simply put, that the PL is screwed in both ventures?
Where can I get an Etihad toy car?The aul explain this to a 4 year old chatgpt prompt!
Etihad Toys was just a vehicle for our owner to funnel hundreds of millions into the club....Where can I get an Etihad toy car?
Unfortunately I agree somewhat.We won't clear our name, we will be found guilty of something & even if it's not a major charge, it'll mean that the narrative of City cooking the books will continue