City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

Not to Labour my earlier point but a Quick Look at Twitter and you have City fans, some of whom have built their social media presence on the back of this football club, openly slagging the club off for finally fighting back.

Fucking quislings. I don’t give a fuck how witty their podcast rants are. They are fucking Quislings.
 
Kazzydeyna said:
Not to Labour my earlier point but a Quick Look at Twitter and you have City fans, some of whom have built their social media presence on the back of this football club, openly slagging the club off for finally fighting back.

Fucking quislings. I don’t give a fuck how witty their podcast rants are. They are fucking Quislings.
Click to expand...

Clicks and engagement trump loyalty when you are trying to build an online presence, I am afraid. I don't subscribe to any. Too disappointing always.
 
homerdog said:
Your response is as expected, but on what basis do you make that assertion?
Click to expand...
I’m not an expert. It was just an honest initial reaction to the Times article and Stefan suggesting that we’d need evidence to show we had lost out on revenue.

I’d love to be wrong and we win this and the 115.
 
Manchester_lalala said:
Even if i didnt argue on twitter, it would be coming on here and reading the continuous recycled arguments, pundits/commentators going on about our investigations, the petty digs from my mates which I’ve argued about for years. Even if today’s latest legal battle reveal means City are fighting back, it’s not football.
Click to expand...
Don't come on here then.
 
meltonblue said:
I don’t think so no. We’ve never done anything like a PSG did, nor would I expect us to ever do it given we’re owned privately by Mansour rather than by a public investment fund.

We’ve got the exposure and the investors to get whatever sponsor deals we want now. If people want to allow increased investment, then personally I’ll always advocate to increase allowed equity contributions.
Click to expand...
We tried to though “Kaku”
Probably the biggest lesson our owner learned when he rejected us
 
i have been having fun on twitter with this argument

If our sponsorship deals have been inflated, then haven't they done well out of them. They have sponsored a team that has won the treble, achieved 100 points, won 4 PL TITLES in a row and done the domestic treble, signed marketable superstars and are a global brand. For sponsors that is a win win scenario. They get to associate themselves with success.

Other teams sponsors will have put lots of money into sponsorship deals and seen the team they have sponsored finish mid table with a leaky roof, a crap manager whilst being millions in debt. These sponsors associate themselves with mediocrity and decay.
 
Fuck the Scum clubs and their Premier League, Declare a breakaway League proposals with fair rules for all clubs and better TV deals with internet companies
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top