City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

Wretched Vengeance said:
So much better listening with Murphy and Matterface than having to endure that engorged ballsack Jordan constantly interrupting.
Click to expand...
Danny Murphy actually tried to learn something and asked questions to get a better understanding of what’s going on.
He didn’t even interrupt and actually listened to the reply.
Well done him.
 
jrb said:
More bullshit being printed.

The amount of negative stories over the last 24 hours is unreal.

The latest take.

Clubs are losing their shit apparently. Hmmm.

The last sentence is a cracker.

“We might as well walk away…..

View attachment 121402
Click to expand...
Well they can fuck off then.
 
Macca77macca said:
I have a lovely member of my team and I went to see her down south for work. Normally would stay at a hotel but stayed at hers. Jeez her fella is a Liverpool fan, from fucking Plymouth, and was grilling me about how far Preston is from Manchester and 115 (with no particular question just mentioning without context) I was like …I have just met you..I am your wifes boss…STFU your a Liverpool fan from PLYMOUTH
Click to expand...
Sack his mrs
 
BigJoe#1 said:
Daft question and probably been asked earlier in the thread but........

If the main charges in the 115 are about false accounting. Isn't that more like a criminal charge that the HMRC should be leading on? Does the fact HMRC are not leading on this by definition make it less likely or much less likely that the Premiere League will be successful?
Click to expand...
If only there was a thread on this matter...
 
I'm Blue said:
Danny Murphy actually tried to learn something and asked questions to get a better understanding of what’s going on.
He didn’t even interrupt and actually listened to the reply.
Well done him.
Click to expand...

I noticed that, looked almost enthralled at the lesson being delivered - and both asked fair and reasonable questions.
 
Macca77macca said:
I have a lovely member of my team and I went to see her down south for work. Normally would stay at a hotel but stayed at hers. Jeez her fella is a Liverpool fan, from fucking Plymouth, and was grilling me about how far Preston is from Manchester and 115 (with no particular question just mentioning without context) I was like …I have just met you..I am your wifes boss…STFU your a Liverpool fan from PLYMOUTH
Click to expand...
I suppose his whining ruined the threesome then?
 
So far today:

City have destroyed the premier league.

City have destroyed the lower leagues from getting a financial deal.

City have destroyed Arsenal again.

City made standard charter sponsor terrorists.

City made a only fans pornstar throw milk at Nigel.

City got Gail platt sacked from coronation street.

City have…

On a serious note, the level of vitriol from the media is horrendous. No amount of in-house PR team could cope with the level of lies and accusations thrown at us. No way of stopping this new online phenomenon. Some day a thesis will be written on this topic.
 
HelloCity said:
Could help as evidence for the non-cooperation charges and why we lacked trust with the PL.
Click to expand...

Skysport and TNT and all the other media outlets are gunning for all the clubs in the hearing, Sky saying the future of the Premier League is in doubt if City win this hearing ?? What the fuck and how can they report this shit
 
blueparrot said:
Right, but nobody seems to have any idea if the voting thing is a separate thing, or just a line thats’s part of pages of evidence that’s part of the ATP case and the ‘tyranny of the majority’ a soundbite taken out of context.
The voting thing just seems odd to me as what would we want it replaced with?
Click to expand...
Stopping city only really benefits the clubs going for champ league
So why would other clubs vote for financial restrictions knowing it’s their only hope.
Unless the hateful 8 were canvassing the other clubs
 
projectriver said:
Listen if City want to hire me as a spokesman that is one thing. If I am giving a good faith opinion (with caveats) I will say what I want to say. Cheers
Click to expand...
I thought you were very clear and calm.
You take the heat and emotion out of the other two and encourage that they and us the audience, take a step back and look at the facts of all we know so far.

You were clear that this was your opinion or best guess on the limited one sided evidence we have so far.

I thought it was a fair assessment that the layman can digest, should he choose to do so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top