President Trump

It’s not really a question of wanting. These are the options the US voter has to choose from. On that basis Biden is the only sane choice. I mean, the other guy is a convicted felon babbling nonsense about battery controlled sharks.

As ever Bob, I give the whole picture and use the caveat of enforcement in choice from the parties and media to create these choices to make my point.
 
And your last statement is what the political parties rely on and you can't help, but play along because of the "lack of choice" the MSM saddle you with.

It's just devastatingly depressing.
It’s not the MSM, it’s the 2 party system. However, there are always alternatives, but none ever come anywhere near winning!

And your solution?

Why is it so depressing? Why would I not want Biden to win, and thus vote for him?

Why are you being so overly dramatic about it? Where is it better?
 
It’s not the MSM, it’s the 2 party system. However, there are always alternatives, but none ever come anywhere near winning!

And your solution?

Why is it so depressing? Why would I not want Biden to win, and thus vote for him?

Why are you being so overly dramatic about it? Where is it better?

It's not about being 'dramatic', Chicago. Is it not about being sheep herded into voting against a collective interest with false choice? Where's the 'democracy' in not platforming a political argument/ voice that doesn't comply with centrist warring/ fleecing?

You're, obviously, not bothered by the need to squeeze money for war and not the citizen. To say the MSM aren't the issue just absolves them of complicity!

I'll agree with you (as you with me reflectively in your response) the two horse system is done and no longer reflects the wider nation. Isn't it true your forefathers did NOT want a two party system (British politics being the influence)? So how did it arrive as such? People are tired of these politics where they have no true say.

Are we not seeing the end of many centrist govs in Europe?

Why is the question.
 
As ever Bob, I give the whole picture and use the caveat of enforcement in choice from the parties and media to create these choices to make my point.
I've read this three times and have no idea what it means even as a piece of English, never mind as a political statement. So your point is lost on me and probably on others.
 
I've read this three times and have no idea what it means even as a piece of English, never mind as a political statement. So your point is lost on me and probably on others.

Maybe read, if you can be arsed, the actual subject matter.

Might help a bit.

Actually don't, you won't understand it if you can't understand this.
 
It's amusing watching posters celebrate the lack of choice they have in "truth" and politics.

A sad state of affairs, but not surprising anymore.

Most don't have a choice. As they aren't citizens of the USA. So it doesn't matter if you want to vote for Jill Stein, Cornell West, Biden, Trump or Chevy Chase.

You know Biden isn't as bad as Trump. Even accepting your point that he is a terrible candidate, he's not as bad as Trump.

And yet here you are soiling yourself in protest again.
 
Most don't have a choice. As they aren't citizens of the USA. So it doesn't matter if you want to vote for Jill Stein, Cornell West, Biden, Trump or Chevy Chase.

You know Biden isn't as bad as Trump. Even accepting your point that he is a terrible candidate, he's not as bad as Trump.

And yet here you are soiling yourself in protest again.

Where did I mention US in that post, silly boy?
 
You regularly veer away from subject matter without recourse.

But, you keep being hypocritical to score your points.

You weren't quoting a post, or even directly replying to anyone so if you wanted to make a point about something else i.e. The UK why didn't you just post it in the relevant thread?

Or are you just making it up as you go along to score points?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top