Kamala Harris
- Thread starter idahoblues
- Start date
Bigga
Well-Known Member
So, if you ignore the procession, as that will settle down, Harris' record is going to come into play, big time. She's done some awful stuff and I've shown a little of that on BM.
I think she's on a hiding to nothing and I can't figure out why the Dem leaders are telling all and sundry to 'look at her record as a prosecutor' feigning that it's 'superb'. I think they're looking to open her up to view and seeing if she can survive things like her affair with Willie Brown (the mayor of San Fran at the time), where he boosted her unqualified credentials, at the time, into positions of consequence she did not earn. All at the benefit of the mutual transactional relationship, they had. This is not speculation. There's plenty of info out there, but the MSM never explores her rise (or Willie Brown's!!) to power.
Anyway, opinion at the ground, not the spinning MSM...
I don't think Trump needs to do too much.
Her record will be front and centre soon enough.
I think she's on a hiding to nothing and I can't figure out why the Dem leaders are telling all and sundry to 'look at her record as a prosecutor' feigning that it's 'superb'. I think they're looking to open her up to view and seeing if she can survive things like her affair with Willie Brown (the mayor of San Fran at the time), where he boosted her unqualified credentials, at the time, into positions of consequence she did not earn. All at the benefit of the mutual transactional relationship, they had. This is not speculation. There's plenty of info out there, but the MSM never explores her rise (or Willie Brown's!!) to power.
Anyway, opinion at the ground, not the spinning MSM...
I don't think Trump needs to do too much.
Her record will be front and centre soon enough.
tommybooth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 5,916
She is better suited to pumping fuel.
The "ground"? Good grief.
You really do prefer a man accused of raping a teenager to a woman who had a relationship with an older man?
Bigga
Well-Known Member
So, you dismiss the Working Class view? Okay, cool.
Without endorsing anything, you pose your question from a false position of equivalency! You wrote it and didn't register?? To "accuse" doesn't mean factual. Anybody can point a finger, even to you. What you should be bothered about is 'facts' as 'facts' are impartial to 'emotion' which is prevalent on BM.
Her record against the Black community is exceedingly poor, but because someone from the community itself speaks as an advocate for and from the community, it's dismissed because... MSM.
Kamaro011
Well-Known Member
Americans is fucked either way with Trump or Kamala Harris which is not better either to become US President.
Citizen of Legoland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 12,006
What is that 1% nonsense the video starts with? It’s from Fox News for a start but what was the question that lead to it and when was it from?
Americans are obsessed with these sort of statistics but there are so many poll results out there, it’s easy to just pick and choose those that fit the answer you’re hoping to prove.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
I agree with you on the poll numbers.
Whether it comes from 'Fox News' or 'CNN/ MSNBC' is highly immaterial, though. The poll isn't important. Her record as Gov is. Her record of not winning her own state in her original Pres push, is.
And, much like Biden, she's being ushered into a position without fair or true challenge. I thought 'democracy' was important?!!
What a bizarre view. That concoction of words is beyond me.
Here's a Bazaar view. 40,000 black women can't be wrong, can they? Or are they MSM?
Here’s How 40,000 Black Women Mobilized on Zoom for Kamala Harris
Hours after Joe Biden stepped down from the presidential race, thousands of Black women got together to raise over $1 million for presumptive Democratic nominee Kamala Harris
www.harpersbazaar.com
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 13,502
- Team supported
- City
I think the Trump supporters are worried with their disinformation and hate campaign going into full swing soon.What a bizarre view. That concoction of words is beyond me.
Here's a Bazaar view. 40,000 black women can't be wrong, can they? Or are they MSM?
Here’s How 40,000 Black Women Mobilized on Zoom for Kamala Harris
Hours after Joe Biden stepped down from the presidential race, thousands of Black women got together to raise over $1 million for presumptive Democratic nominee Kamala Harris
Big Joe Corrigan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 4,724
So both sides?
FlemishDuck
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2015
- Messages
- 1,806
I dont see a smoking gun yet, im 15 minutes in this video and wish the host would get on with it already and show us the more dammaging things. Oh she is a centrist candidate, oh as DA she also prosecuted black people ... idk that video is not getting to the point hard with any incriminating evidence though
Honestly that she is an establishment candidate who for a fair degree will campaign on not being Trump is nothing surprizing. What is more importnat imho is that she has a legal background and the current ellections besides what is to be done after it takes a very heavy justice agenda. With the Supreme court out of control, that DA profile has some strategic value into stopping the judicial collapse of the US.
Anyway back to the vide then? Hope this isnt all lost time ...
Last edited:
The far right keep saying they have a smoking gun or proof of stuff but never ever reveal it. Guilliani and Lindell constantly say they have voter fraud proof but never ever share it. Just constantly grifting cash from the foolish.
Kippaxpete
Well-Known Member
Useful summary that cuts through all the disingenuous bullshit on this thread. Frankly, for all Harris's faults, they pale into insignificance when set against the existential threat to democracy posed by the prospect of a second Trump term. Occam's Razor right there.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
What a bizarre view. That concoction of words is beyond me.
Here's a Bazaar view. 40,000 black women can't be wrong, can they? Or are they MSM?
Here’s How 40,000 Black Women Mobilized on Zoom for Kamala Harris
Hours after Joe Biden stepped down from the presidential race, thousands of Black women got together to raise over $1 million for presumptive Democratic nominee Kamala Harris
Okay, whatever. You're missing the context of her record.
All you're doing is posting the popular view. Black women uplifting a 'woman of colour' who, herself, until the last few years cited herself as Indian American as she not African American. Who knew that was going to happen.
It's fine.
We'll see what happens when her record is flayed open for view, like taking 5x more money from AIPAC in her support for Israel.
We'll see.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Oh... a 'smoking gun' like her holding on to the release of nonviolent Black prisoners who had legally finished their term?
She
The Full Article...
Yes, no issues with Harris' record at all. Interesting that there's a dearth of impartial/ objective views on Harris in any reasonable page searches. The book "Kamala Harris & The Future of America: An Essay in Three Parts" has been taken off Amazon book listing.
One should question the reasoning.
FlemishDuck
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2015
- Messages
- 1,806
You know, just on the particular of what is written there, one has to question whether it is deemed Harris did "something morally objectionable" or "exceeded/broke the law". As i look upon the details of what is written there it seems Harris did things she legally could do but were not with unanimous agreement as to that being the just course of action, and so the criticism might pertain more as to how people in that position should act and what legal recommendations they should follow rather than how the law limits their authority and how she might have broken the law in doing her job. Frankly if the latter was the case then she likely would not have stayed in position i reckon, so it seems to me that "harsh as her decisions might have been" that she might be able to justify all that as the kind of decisions that were up to her choice to make and which she made in good conciounce.
Now granted, that might create some detterent among certain voters to vote for her, if indeed she is not deemed "on their side", but i think many of those won't find a better alternative in Trump au contraire so ....
Ask Amazon? On the link below you can find it on bol.com, there are plenty of other places too.
Kamala Harris & The Future of America, Caleb Maupin | 9798681095491 | Boeken | bol
Kamala Harris & The Future of America (Paperback).
www.bol.com
Bigga
Well-Known Member
You know, just on the particular of what is written there, one has to question whether it is deemed Harris did "something morally objectionable" or "exceeded/broke the law". As i look upon the details of what is written there it seems Harris did things she legally could do but were not with unanimous agreement as to that being the just course of action, and so the criticism might pertain more as to how people in that position should act and what legal recommendations they should follow rather than how the law limits their authority and how she might have broken the law in doing her job. Frankly if the latter was the case then she likely would not have stayed in position i reckon, so it seems to me that "harsh as her decisions might have been" that she might be able to justify all that as the kind of decisions that were up to her choice to make and which she made in good conciounce.
Now granted, that might create some detterent among certain voters to vote for her, if indeed she is not deemed "on their side", but i think many of those won't find a better alternative in Trump au contraire so ....
Ask Amazon? On the link below you can find it on bol.com, there are plenty of other places too.
Kamala Harris & The Future of America, Caleb Maupin | 9798681095491 | Boeken | bol
Kamala Harris & The Future of America (Paperback).
Wow...
I don't think I could have been more stunned to find someone write that her 'illegal' and 'unjustifiable' reasoning to keep nonviolent prisoners beyond their term as possibly acceptable. That's real pretzel reasoning!
As for Amazon, I did not state the book could not be found at smaller distributors, but I asked why the biggest bookstore in the world online took it off their buying option.