Of course - you might think that a City fan would say this, but.....
I find your post both confusing and confused.....
Confusing because....
Up front you say that you are not going to post an opinion on the main charges, and then the rest of your post........
Confused because,.......
Well most of it - but particularly your 2nd para - which is, IMO, utterly ill-thought through nonsense
Where in that post do I say you are guilty of the main charges, ? Where have I posted a comment or an opinion of those main charges? I offer a comment on the Mancini issue and will repeat if what has been leaked is indeed correct then it will be down to a judgement call by the IC.“Not going to post an opinion” but go on to assume we are guilty. That’s some non-opinion. What do think if we are cleared of everything? How much will your club be paying us for the shite we’ve had to put up with? I would accept a nine figure sum off your club. You can afford it. You could sell another hotel, you bent bastards.
Surely you must grasp those minor issues such as Mancini or the image rights issue aren’t the ones that if proven will lead to massive points deductions, relegation or whatever.
As for the investment in the stadium I personally think with the owners having said from the off that there’s nothing to see here re the charges not to have continued with that investment would be read as strange and the press narrative would not be a positive You clearly don’t see it that way but I would have taken a bet how the wider footballing community would have read such a withdraw
In terms of what happens if as most on here expect all charges are found not proven I doubt that City will pursue the matter of reputational damage, I might be wrong but we will have to wait and see so I very much doubt the problem comes if the charges are indeed proven.
As for selling a hotel no more of them left but if you fancy a Kings Road Penthouse sure we could do a deal