And whatever the fuck was going on with Chelsea last/this season.And the TeamViewer shenanigans.
Yeah sorry…feel all giddy with news of the PL not having it their own wayOh dear :-)
You'd have to ask what was being voted on that was reportedly withdrawn?If they've won, what would they be rushing to vote on? The existing rule was voted for and passed in February
Try lifting them with your cock.No one told me they were for just for the birds.
But that's not confirmed yet, at the moment it is just press speculation :-(Yeah sorry…feel all giddy with news of the PL not having it their own way
They need to recoup some of that wasted £50mNever trust them, If we have won the PSR fight you can bet something else will come up and City will be fined
I sort of knew we had won the PSR fight anyway when the Premier League slapped a £2million fine for delaying the kickoffs, You can bet your bottom dollar they will be after us for any little thing possible
I would, but my wrists aren’t what they used to be.Try lifting them with your cock.
Three possibilities:
a) arrested
b) very impressive
c) having the strongest bird in the farmyard.
+ snapdragon. What's in it for them, it's not a producer of commercial productsAnd the TeamViewer shenanigans.
Probably like this because we did winSeems that worst case we've won by a bit. Best case we've won by a lot.
I'm OK with that but wouldn't it be better for football if things like thus weren't carried out under the veil of secrecy?
Still works for the NYT.Tariq - Recently let go by the NY Times did he not? The guy is a Liverpool mouthpiece ,a charlatan .Nothing more nothing less.
As for Kaveh "They are signing an 80 million pound player for a lot less"....Enough said.
It was amended to change the ATP transactions to the new rules agreed to by the clubs, reflected in this season’s rules If City win their case a new amendment will be requiredSorry call me lazy if you want, but thick would be more appropriate, i was led to believe that the 24/25 season had no changes to the 23/24 season rules, so what i want to know are the February changes in the new rule book?
It would mean they go back to the rules in place before Feb24 how can that be huge ramifications Let’s face it these are in place to stop Newcastle and any other club that comes up with new ownersIt would have huge ramifications. It would mean a football rule, that is against the law of the land would not be in place any more.
It would also mean that one or two (probably no more than that) would think twice about supporting a discriminatory and illegal rule for no reason other than "it will get City".
Somehow I don't think that's what the author of the quote above was thinking of.
I do not think they got renumeration of £40 million, think they got an allowance on their losses, which should upset Everton, due to the wording of their charges.
The big question would be who authorized this allowance, and did they vote on it, because to me it stinks of the Platini case.
The pricks already said we’ve lostI'm not believing anything until I hear it from Magic Hat!
Those are huge ramifications for certain clubsIt would mean they go back to the rules in place before Feb24 how can that be huge ramifications Let’s face it these are in place to stop Newcastle and any other club that comes up with new owners