City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

[BlueDejong]

Doesn't it mean that City won if some clauses related to ATP need to be amended or removed? I don't understand the Premier League's statement.

 

[willipp]

I know this doesn't directly relate to 115, but it does highlight that not only are the PL utterly incompetent and unlawful, but they are clearly targeting City to stop our progress and superiority.

Anyone who is objectively looking at this must surely wonder how can those 115 charges stack up when they have clearly been found to be targeting and cheating to bring City down.

 

[nu774ll]

Absolutely laughable the PL have released a statement claiming victories in the tribunal and saying most of City’s were thrown out!! Are the American Red Tops even writing their statements!?

 

[Really_here]

This should boil some piss on the Untied forum 8-)

 

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

Is this the moment the club finally has the option to go nuclear?

 

[Gray]

Have the Beeb ever been complimentary about us?

We should storm their offices at Salford Quays and super glue ourselves to the doors on every floor.

 

[DATOIA]

City vs Red Cartel

 

[Rammy Blue]

They're just spinning the verdict. I've no objection to having rules around APT and PSR as long as they're applied equally to all 20 clubs, and I suspect that's City's view as well.

They’ve realised it’s the only way to try to diminish our win and spin it for the red cartel.

 

[Gray]

Is this the moment the club finally has the option to go nuclear?

Oh please do it.

 

[cheekybids]

I’m going to buy a new Dyson as a thank you :)

 

[I'm Blue]

 

[Rammy Blue]

Doesn't it mean that City won if some clauses related to ATP need to be amended or removed? I don't understand the Premier League's statement.

It’s the best they can come up after having 2 weeks to do so! Hahaha.

 

[mike1923]

Doesn't it mean that City won if some clauses related to ATP need to be amended or removed? I don't understand the Premier League's statement.

They’re trying to claim a victory by suggesting the panel agreed that there is a need for rules

City have never suggested there shouldn’t be any rules, just that the ones the premier league brought in were illegal and discriminatory. Which they were, and they’ve now been lobbed out

 

[Gesario]

I know this doesn't directly relate to 115, but it does highlight that not only are the PL utterly incompetent and unlawful, but they are clearly targeting City to stop our progress and superiority.

Anyone who is objectively looking at this must surely wonder how can those 115 charges stack up when they have clearly been found to be targeting and cheating to bring City down.

Take that you dirty bastards Leave my club alone

 

[Blue Maverick]

1 down 115 to go, oh it’s going to be glorious when Pep extends we sign a sponsorship deal worth half a billion, win the quadruple, rebuild the team and then finally cleared of 115.

 

[Bluearmy]

He's the only one I'd trust to tell the actual truth, he always has.

Actually Lawton’s piece

 

[GaudinoMotors]

Can this Vicky Gormless spit the fact we've won out more vitriolically?

 

[Xhavenjoe]

I’m going to buy a new Dyson as a thank you :)

Don't
They suck

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Doesn't it mean that City won if some clauses related to ATP need to be amended or removed? I don't understand the Premier League's statement.

The gulty man's statement at the steps of the noose !

 

[burning blue soul]