Kippaxpete
Well-Known Member
Don't hold your breath. Masters has about as much shame as a Tory politician.Surely Masters has to resign on the back of this.
Don't hold your breath. Masters has about as much shame as a Tory politician.Surely Masters has to resign on the back of this.
Bold statement? Yes. No claim for damages? NoThere's a huge opportunity here for City to show the Premier League and our rivals up for what they are.
I would like to see a bold statement, to publicly acknowledge the findings and state that although we are entitled to damages, we will not be pursuing them. Advise that our only aim was to ensure a level playing field for all and suggest that we forego damages in the hope that these funds are reinvested into the grassroots level of the game.
on 9320 pod tomo as well.He’s ploughing through the 164 pages, give him a chance! (Though he’s posted a few snippets on X - Mr Herbert (who he?) seems to have almost perjured themselves).
I know it has been posted in the thread, but I just wanted to give it another direct link to the article (rather than the archive link) so that clicks and engagement could be driven to Samuel’s excellent content for those with access.
These outlets only really care about what content drives the most ad revenue and so we should be very selective about which links we share. But I think, even if it gives The Times some revenue they could use to beat City with later, this is content that should be supported and amplified by blues.
Seismic verdict for football that leaves financial rules in tatters
The Premier League overplayed its hand and now the whole concept of PSR is in the bin. Man City’s legal victory could have huge consequences for some clubs
![]()
Seismic verdict for football that leaves financial rules in tatters
The Premier League overplayed its hand and now the whole concept of PSR is in the bin. Man City’s legal victory could have huge consequences for some clubswww.thetimes.com
Mate they would barely understand the word pontificate never mind complex financial and legal machinations.It’s fucking hilarious watching these people who are barely qualified to tweet about football flailing around in a pitiful attempt to pontificate about matters of law that they plainly don’t understand.
No have your say though hey .Jesus, I’ve just heard Simon Stone on 5 live trying to explain it, he can barely speak, the thick twat
Khaldoon doesn't fuck about
There owners only take money out not put it inTo be honest this probavly suots tge scruffy yonner, Ineos has several offshoot companies he could realistically use to pump money into the club.
Not that the cheap **** will.
For non related parties (which Etihad are) the onus will be put on the PL to prove its not Fair Market going forwards not on the club to prove it is. So how can the PL judge what value a private company place on a deal.Just going back before 2021 rules where sponsor are still have to be fair value you can't have Etihad sponsoring us for 200m a year!
The bigger one is the loans from owner being 0% it got to be fair value where normal would be around 5%
ffs how can you size “victory “?Just had a quick gander at the usual suspects Twitter and no shock that Crafton the ****, Ogden the odd’un and Delaney the dick are all reporting that both sides have won small victories and things are just as they were.
I fucking despise the lot of the snidey shithouse cunts. Even when shown that this is a huge win for City they are determined to paint a different picture.
I’d never tire of punching all 3 until my fists were worn down to blood soaked stumps.
I would think Newcastle may want some compensation in all of this?Don’t be so sure, the old cartel has just been smashed to bits you cheating cunts & clubs you have trodden down will want some retribution
So let that keep you awake at night
West Ham, Brentford, Fulham and wolves aren’t yank owned (afaik)
All bring wellHas anyone checked in on Mark Goldbridge since this news broke? Wouldn’t surprise me if he’s found swinging from a tree in the Sherwood Forest
What does this mean?
@slbsn has pulled this bit from the verdict.
It really is disgraceful isn't it. Other clubs directly contacting the PL to immediately amend the rules to restrict competition.
I’m sure he will clear it up. I just recall shouty Jim asking him what he thinks could happen, and he said he could seeing us lose this case. It was a good few months ago now though.I think he said 'IF'.