City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

The tide is turning and it's turning against the like of the Arse, Utd and Ted Bundypool FC. Especially the Arse, bunch of total hypocrites with their Rwanda sponsorships, Emirates (no oil money here malarkey) and pathetic attempts to land us in it down the years. A nasty, bitter, spiteful bunch of tossers who are making themselves more and more unpopular with each passing week. PSR may get them on the interest-free shareholder loans at some point which would be poetic justice, using an unlawful and anti-competitive method to stay clear of PSR failings.
GIRUY ....there will be more to come
 
Don Karleone said:
Wouldn't we want Master's to stay in the job? He's an idiot.
Click to expand...

He is a pathetic, duplicitous and weak **** who does not deserve to be drawing the kind of salary the PL will be paying him, at our and other clubs expense.


And it is an insult to injury for the clubs who have suffered especially, ourselves, Newcastle and other non-cabal members.
 
John Wayne said:
That's exactly right. I would argue, however, that the club most likely knew that the whole concept of APT would not be thrown out. But to win on the two most-recent amendments, ie Nov 21 and Feb 24, represents a substantial victory. The PL is in an invidious position now because I can't see a scenario whereby interest-free shareholder loans, that don't need to be repaid, can co-exist with an FMV assessment of APTs.
Click to expand...

We can argue about whether city won or lost but I think it’s a solid position that the PL has suffered a very bad defeat.

A governing body being found by an independent tribunal to be attempting to introduce unlawful rules is disastrous no matter what other aspects they may have won (especially in the context of the email which shows the PL attempted to introduce these unlawful rules at the behest of certain other clubs in a targeted and malicious way)
 
DTKOAG said:
Nice for our lovely neighbours to give evidence against us..
Click to expand...
Not entirely unexpected, especially given the points we were challenging the PL on and the fact they are a bunch of arsewipes. I suspect they sided with the PL as the shareholder thing could come back and bite them on the arse big time?
 
Colin Bells Boots said:
He is a pathetic, duplicitous and weak **** who does not deserve to be drawing the kind of salary the PL will be paying him, at our and other clubs expense, especially those who have integrity and have suffered as a consequence of his decisions and acts.
Click to expand...


He is. He's also incompetent which helps us. Every other club can get fucked for all care these days.
 
PL APTs found to be unlawful.

PL APTs found to be procedurally unfair.

P164 of the findings highlights more.

Will the PL be sanctioning City or pursuing us for damages, as according to some media outlets, the PL appear to have won the case.

The bastards just can't help themselves !!
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
Why do they need an emergency meeting. I thought the PL won the case!
Click to expand...
Vote of no confidence in Richard Masters? Or maybe, just maybe, because the Premier League has acted unlawfully and "abused it's dominant position" this could be used as an argument against the other matter they have with the club and it could bring that crashing down.
 
mcfcphil said:
We can argue about whether city won or lost but I think it’s a solid position that the PL has suffered a very bad defeat.

A governing body being found by an independent tribunal to be attempting to introduce unlawful rules is disastrous no matter what other aspects they may have won (especially in the context of the email which shows the PL attempted to introduce these unlawful rules at the behest of certain other clubs in a targeted and malicious way)
Click to expand...
I have no doubt that the media (especially Harris) will be all over that particular aspect of the report. We know they love a good email trail to show proof of guilt.
 
bigA said:
Vote of no confidence in Richard Masters? Or maybe, just maybe, because the Premier League has acted unlawfully and "abused it's dominant position" this could be used as an argument against the other matter they have with the club and it could bring that crashing down.
Click to expand...
And all of the above surely mitigates our non cooperation in the other case.
 
Don Karleone said:
Wouldn't we want Master's to stay in the job? He's an idiot.
Click to expand...
No we wouldnt, we dont need an idiot in the job, an idiot is only useful when you are trying to pull a fast one to protect your own interests like some of the duplicitous cunts currently are, when you are advocating for fairness and equality across the board which is what we are then you need a strong and fair leader who is aware of the rules and wont be manipulated
 
Wow. So it wasn't us it was them all along. What a twist ending. Arsenal (the cheating bastards) will probably have to sell to stay inside the rules so cheeky bids for Saka, Odegaard and Rice would be great fun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top