So happy they’ve had to call an emergency meeting to tell everybody how happy they are
So happy they’ve had to call an emergency meeting to tell everybody how happy they are
Yep. Many of us completely vindicated after years of smirks and innuendoWhat it does confirm is that there is a cartel, in cahoots with the PL, who are targeting specific clubs, and the media are complicit in their ‘monopoly washing’.
Proper noses in the trough, the dirty fucking cunts!
It's my twitter profile pic now. Many thanks.
Absolutely bang on and I feel confident City are delighted with the tribunal’s findings. They have absolutely broken the cartel with this. By having shareholders funds included in PSR they have changed the landscape for several owners including Arsenal. Basically several rich people are going to have write off about £1.5bn in loans or fail PSR.I think upon a little reflection the extent of City’s victory depends on the club’s objectives. If it was to destroy APT (which I highly doubt) then it’s correct to say it’s somewhat limited, although still material. If it was to recalibrate the rules (which I expect it was) then the success would have to be, at the very least, characterised as highly successful.
However, what cannot be open to debate is the extent of the PL’s defeat. A de facto public authority having a finding that its rules were unlawful, as was the way they were applied, is huge. As are the findings of procedural irregularity and unfairness.
To fail to understand this is to fail to appreciate the function of an authority such as this, the laws of natural justice and the burden and standard of proof required to establish such findings.
This following from the Leicester shambles further underlines this organisation is not even close to being fit to oversee a multi-billion pound industry that has attained huge strategic and commercial importance to the UK.
That should be the story, but instead all we have is mental gymnastics from the media about how neither side won - when one of them manifestly lost.
That's "legal advice"? I think the punctuation alone of that extract renders it nonsensical.
Yes they did. I had to rewind it to make sure.I'm sure North West tonight
Just said City have failed in their bid to get the ATP Case won and it's Directly linked to 115?
Did anyone else hear this
1 min ago?
What the point that the IC say that nominal interest will need to be calculated when owners have soft loans which almost certainly will either see those loans converted to equity which for all intents and purposes they are already equity or the fact that APT will probably in one form or another still be in place.
Of course 7 clubs could vote against the whole concept but I don’t think that will happen
Mirror decided it's a draw now.The Times, The Mail, Mirror, SKY, even the Guardian are reporting a City win and have done all day. Even TalkSPORT did as well. The BBC are the outlier.
What a joke. It must be run by a rag/dipper.Today is the last straw for me as to why the BBC is corrupt.
10.00pm local bbc news
“Manchester city have failed on the majority of charges brought against the PL”
Absolutely fkin incredible!
What the point that the IC say that nominal interest will need to be calculated when owners have soft loans which almost certainly will either see those loans converted to equity which for all intents and purposes they are already equity or the fact that APT will probably in one form or another still be in place.
Of course 7 clubs could vote against the whole concept but I don’t think that will happen

Like that oneWe’re playing premier league jenga with these fuckers at the moment and any minute now we’ll pull the brick that makes them all fucking fall.
But the PL won on penalties.Mirror decided it's a draw now.
Sky are the real cartel in all this, don’t expect anything other than a white washing from them, probably leaving the listener/reader to their own biased judgement.SSN reviewing the headlines - carefully avoiding The Times - Samuel is not alone - Lawton and even Ziegler are all agreed the PL is a gonner.
It properly started in May 2012, the very date of "realisation".It's called racism. It started for City in 2008.
I think the most important thing to sort out first is the Premier League board members and its voting system on rule changes, I think MANCHESTER CITY should call for a vote of no confidence in the Premier League system and call for major changes and ask the chairman to stand down
Those Match of the Day highlights come at a priceMy personal favourite coverage of the Tribunal decision is from the BBC.
Nearly every other purportedly reputable outlet has not only provided a full analysis immediately as the story broke (i.e. they had it ready in advance of the decision being released to all the clubs), but they indicate that, on balance, this is a win (if not a major one) for City.
But BBC has given it the minor story treatment on the Sport and Football news pages, and it’s barebones blurb attempts to set the narrative that this was not a defeat of the PL’s APT rules and enforcement, and definitely not a victory for City.
The way that you know this is a dubious narrative is that, had it actually been a win for the PL, the story link and image would have been a massive block at the top of both the Sport and Football pages, and the immediate write up would have been an in-depth analysis of all of the ways City failed in our challenge.
PL-captured “journalism” at it’s worst.
![]()
![]()
Is it not that loans can be repaid, equity can’t be withdrawn?To take a charge on the assets probably and ease of administration. Equity requires admin and legals. Loan much simpler.