City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

All I'll say is how incredibly awesome is it that you guys have Stefan Borson on here to give his considered view based on years of expertise. Whilst the 'old man shouting at clouds' type of posts that dominate this thread may be more immediately visceral, facts and opinions based on years of expertise are optimal IMHO.

It's also a reminder to myself to not comment on things I don't know the ins and outs of without expressly stating it's an opinion or hearsay and should be treated as such. Others would do well to follow likewise.
Indeed. You're a brave man coming on here, what with your Arsenal allegiance and all the anger that City fans now feel towards that club. Their part in all of this and their tub-thumping rallying calls to the other PL clubs to unite against big bad, cheating City, is now starting to be revealed. Hence the increasing antagonism towards AFC from most of the City fans on here.
I do feel there is a change in mood in the last few months from the other club's (and fans) perception of the "red cartel" and with this verdict, it is likely to increase. It's funny, reading through twitter and responses from Arsenal. LFC and Utd fans, none of them seem glad that rules deemed "unlawful" and "anti-completive" will likely vanish...no, they still side with the PL and still see it as big bad, cheating City trying to bully their way through the rules...which is ironic given the 'cartel" like behaviour of the aforementioned clubs.
 
I think that’s slightly wide of the mark about Cliff. Firstly he will be professionally precluded from winning at all costs. Secondly the letter that was sent out was extremely strident of itself and even more so by way of its contents. Thirdly he will have been acting on instructions to do so, that will have been given following advice from others, including no doubt, Pannick.

This is a huge departure from the earlier press release and should be viewed accordingly.

It’s also worth pointing out the poor track record of the legal advice the PL has been in receipt of, which should colour anyone’s views on the relative quality of City’s.
Could it be the case that they have received very good advice and decided to ignore it? It has been known to happen sometimes on a risk and reward basis, the risk you get found out the reward you don't and you hobble an opponent but to me it's hard to believe they actually thought they would get away with it
 
It's incredibly weird how the same people who understand that other clubs executives and teams say things that may be a very liberal interpretation of events but they believe that nobody at City could possibly do the same.
Have any of them sent out letters to the other clubs in such strident terms?
 
Could it be the case that they have received very good advice and decided to ignore it? It has been known to happen sometimes on a risk and reward basis, the risk you get found out the reward you don't and you hobble an opponent but to me it's hard to believe they actually thought they would get away with it
Who? City?
 
I'll say this again - if you are the governing body, and in a legal proceeding, the laws you enacted are judged to have been unlawful, unreasonable and unfair it impossible to claim that you won. It is unreasonable to claim a score draw even.

And it is bizarre for anyone to defend you. Clubs, pundits, fans attempting to be magnanimous. This was the thrust of Martin Samuel's article - for that to be described as nonsense just makes no sense to me.

Everyone, from every club, should be outraged by the behavior and, being kind, incompetence of the people we trust to be in charge.
 
So if Samuel had the same training as GDM he'd be kosher and Cliff isn't representing the advice of our entire legal team? I know you feel the need to line up with the forum admin to support Stefan but really.
Samuel has always been on our side on this, but there are times he writes nonsense too. In the main though he can be an over the top blusterer and while he made some good points this was one of those times.
 
This is turning into the politics thread.
Both lefties and righties finding each other, readying for battle.
I'll toss a coin into the mix and we can learn the truth.
Does Stefan stand up and celebrate an Haaland hat-trick or does he bemoan that the flag should of gone up for his 3rd goal?


I'll get my cloak
 
Maybe YOU should be the one to find evidence of the thing you said happened, happening.
It was months ago and to be honest wouldn't know how to find it, fairly sure it was discussed on here at the time,I'm sure others would remember but we'll see.
 
Of course not the PL
You didn’t say who tbf!

Yes, but there’s a huge distinction between a carefully worded press release that some PR agency has been working on for days and a letter that stridently asserts a legal position to the members of the organisation that you have been in litigation with.

The former is necessary and designed principally to limit any damage; the latter is inherently more risky, elective, and would have to be founded (especially in this instance) on unequivocal legal advice.

So the former isn’t really a function of any legal advice, whereas the latter would only be sent following that advice.
 
"Well they would wouldn't they?" As the saying goes. Here is the verdict on the charges.

Unlawful, unlawful, unlawful, unfair, unfair, unreasonable, unreasonable.
Mandy Rice Davies (RIP) likes this quote

Screen Shot 2024-10-08 at 14.24.20.pngScreen Shot 2024-10-08 at 14.26.12.pngScreen Shot 2024-10-08 at 14.26.23.png

"Well he would, wouldn't he?", by 1979, this phrase had entered the third edition of the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, and is occasionally referred to with the abbreviation MRDA ("Mandy Rice-Davies applies").
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top