City launch legal action against the Premier League | Club & PL reach settlement | Proceedings dropped (p1147)

Damocles said:
Only did 3 years at a sports law firm and instead now is a well connected legal journalist?

You're right, let's believe Martin Samuel instead whose qualifications seem to be "says what I prefer to hear".



This guy is Associate Professor at LSE Law School and Research Fellow of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law. He says essentially the same as Stefan and The Lawyer.
Click to expand...

The PL legals have friends too ;-')
 
Cheer Up Peter Reid said:
One potential explanation is that Nielsen used different baseline data sets for each validation. We already know from the ruling that the PL were not prepared to share details of their database with us. Perhaps it is biased towards where we came from, versus where we are now / potential future value.

Designed to keep us in our place as such.
Click to expand...
If (kit:red) then multiplier:2
If (kit:blue) then multiplier:0.5
Else multiplier:1
 
slbsn said:
Idiotic response.
Talksport give me no guidance what to say and would LOVE me to say the most extreme things imaginable.
Click to expand...
Just for some balance regarding what I have been reading as I try to catch-up on this thread.................

On rawk - the redscouse make comments such as these regarding you:

Offline
danm77​

  • Anny Roader
  • *
    *
    *
    *
  • Posts: 367
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
xx.gif

Re: 115 charges for the scorched earth cheating bastards on & off the pitch​

« Reply #9210 on: Today at 10:09:51 am »

Quote from: RedSince86 on Today at 08:51:39 am
Stefan Borson blocked me on X.

A few weeks ago I replied he was a Bullshit artist on Bluemoon, and why the fuck do TalkSport have him on.

Apparently he's he's been having a meltdown the last 48-72 hours.

I've also seen on X Cheats had to put "huge new Etihad" deal on hold because of FMV, seems to be the crux of why they challenged APT in the first place.
Click to expand...
Borson really annoys me. He is obviously highly knowledgeable, but his City bias is blatantly obvious
 
Oldham Exile said:
Just for some balance regarding what I have been reading as I try to catch-up on this thread.................

On rawk - the redscouse make comments such as these regarding you:

Offline
danm77​

  • Anny Roader
  • *
    *
    *
    *
  • Posts: 367
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
xx.gif

Re: 115 charges for the scorched earth cheating bastards on & off the pitch​

« Reply #9210 on: Today at 10:09:51 am »

Quote from: RedSince86 on Today at 08:51:39 am

Borson really annoys me. He is obviously highly knowledgeable, but his City bias is blatantly obvious
Click to expand...
Is it the bit where he admits he’s a City fan that gives it away?
 
Paladin said:
Confidence in Nielsen is surely tarnished, as we asked them for a FMV and the PL asked them for a FMV a few years later. The PL valuation using the same methodology was much lower than the valuation we paid them to give us.

So as another poster said earlier, Nielsen will deliver whatever result their client pays for.
Click to expand...
This is "istree" vs new normal. How far back have Nielsen gone in their database to assess City's sponsorship potential?

Which dynamics add weight to a clubs saleability? Current success, viewing figures or a clubs historic success.

How far back do the calculations go? The PL era? When Fatty Arbuckle was a Superstar in silent films? City seeking to ascertain the criteria that we are being judged by is perfectly legitimate, & if the PL were honest brokers, they'd be happy with more money coming into the game based on success & ambition.
 
Oldham Exile said:
Just for some balance regarding what I have been reading as I try to catch-up on this thread.................

On rawk - the redscouse make comments such as these regarding you:

Offline
danm77​

  • Anny Roader
  • *
    *
    *
    *
  • Posts: 367
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
xx.gif

Re: 115 charges for the scorched earth cheating bastards on & off the pitch​

« Reply #9210 on: Today at 10:09:51 am »

Quote from: RedSince86 on Today at 08:51:39 am

Borson really annoys me. He is obviously highly knowledgeable, but his City bias is blatantly obvious
Click to expand...
They see anyone talking remotely in City's favour as biased because the media is filled with everyone being anti City. A lot of us blues complain how Stefan doesn't overly fight our corner and sticks to facts.
 
Dribble said:
This is "istree" vs new normal. How far back have Nielsen gone in their database to assess City's sponsorship potential?

Which dynamics add weight to a clubs saleability? Current success, viewing figures or a clubs historic success.

How far back do the calculations go? The PL era? When Fatty Arbuckle was a Superstar in silent films? City seeking to ascertain the criteria that we are being judged by is perfectly legitimate, & if the PL were honest brokers, they'd be happy with more money coming into the game based on success & ambition.
Click to expand...

Cresta, the Corona pop lorry, Fatty Arbuckle, this thread's like being in a bleedin TARDIS.

You're not wrong though. Irrespective of whatever else rival fans do or don't think, if they have half a brain cell they can see very clearly the PL has been acting in bad faith. We knew that all along but this makes it very clear.
 
Bloom out again as the unnamed premier league unofficial mouthpiece? I bet you wanted to keep them with hundreds of millions in shareholder loans as opposed to a club that is told it cant have sponsorships from a company that is in the same region of the world.

Not unlawful to this premier league wanker who hides his identity as it only targets mcfc and newcastle. The red clubs get the lemmings to do their dirty work via sky so they cant be directly accused.

edit: maybe not bloom this time lol

Palace lol, self righteous pricks.
 
manimanc said:
How could the future and the livelihoods of all these clubs in the league be placed in palm of this fools hands.

He's made the Premier League a laughing stock. I'm surprised there isn't a vote to fuck the fat ponce off.
Click to expand...
They need a head to roll after the 115 charges are thrown out. He’s gone then for sure.
 
johnny crossan said:
It's self-evident that the cartel running the PL want their protection racket rules to stay in place, question is how long they'll stick around when its gone?
Click to expand...

So am I missing something here,

It's Okay for owners to loan their clubs £500million interest-free or charge 6% and then add it to the club's debts. But they want to stop Sponsorship deal investments, so the clubs' debt rises, and then it takes the club's market value down by £500million. OK, that sounds like a great idea for football.

So if our owners want to loan us £1billion it is OK, But if our owners agree on a major deal with a large leading company to Sponsors us it is wrong, Even if our owners did have links to that company and it's a major brand trading legally then it's still a legal business that has to produces annual revenue figures that show that sponsorship deal.

It's full-on Prejudice by the Premier League, WHY not go full on back ball in the bag system with its members voting,
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top