President Trump

Dax777 said:
I have NEVER posted anything racist, sexist or homophobic ever.

The nerve of you.
Click to expand...
Demonstrative lie. You have, and I know for a fact you have been banned in the past for doing so.

I just didn’t know why you were recently banned. You’ve been posting sexist comments in the Kamala Harris thread for weeks, as well, a few of which have been removed. It’s a wonder you haven’t been banned from it yet.

I also take note that you didn’t refute “transphobic”.

Anyway, back on ignore.
 
super_city_si said:
This is what baffles me with Trump and the Latino vote. Non of those fuckers would be in the US if Trump was pres. Same again, its a case of "Im here now, but you lot can fuck off"
Click to expand...
“Pull up the drawbridge behind you” is the way immigration has always worked in the US and most other countries.

But Latinos voting for him is turkeys voting for Thanksgiving. But that is the case for almost everyone voting for him.

Most probably think “he means those other people, not me” when he talks about mass deportations, “bad” Jews/“Blacks”/“Marxists”/Women/“Progressives”, “enemies within”, and the many other groups he has derided and threatened, and “purge” actions he has promised.

It is the same thing people have really always done when voting in a populist wanna be dictator.

“He doesn’t mean me.”
 
GOP leaders in some states move to block Justice Department election monitors

Federal authorities have deployed monitors for decades. But Republican leaders in some states have begun denying them entry to polling sites.

The Justice Department’s ability to monitor local jurisdictions for voting rights irregularities on Election Day, already curtailed by the Supreme Court, is facing a new hurdle: opposition from Republicans who are seeking to block federal authorities from polling sites.

The U.S. government has regularly dispatched hundreds of monitors to voting locations in blue, red and swing states, aiming to protect ballot access, discourage improper partisan influence and act as a moderating force on political campaigns.

While the Justice Department has the legal right to request access to polling sites, inflamed partisanship and ideological extremism has contributed to greater resistance to such activities in some GOP-controlled states, legal experts said. Those states have attempted to politicize the process and cast federal monitors as partisans from the Biden administration who cannot be trusted.

Republican leaders in Missouri and Florida, which flatly banned federal monitors in the 2022 midterm elections, said in recent interviews that their positions have not changed and that Justice officials likely would be rebuffed again if they request access to voting locations for Tuesday’s presidential election.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top