SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,485
Not sure if you’re posting in the thread you think you are posting in. I’m not “still bumbling” about anything you mad ****.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
US Politics Thread
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
SkyBlueFlux
Well-Known Member
Always good to find unbiased polling. Often it's a real struggle but then there are gems like this. #gokamala #inthebag
All due respect, as I know I would react the same way if I saw these numbers with no context.
But Selzer is a living legend in political data science circles. When everybody zags, she zigs, and she's generally always right - she's been right for coming on two decades. The last two elections had many pollsters predicting Iowa would be close, she was unequivocal in saying both Clinton and Biden didn't stand a chance and she was within 2% of the result on both occasions. She's been wrong in one single gubernatorial election in 16 years. She's been right in everything else from caucuses, to president, to senators.
You can take it with a pinch of salt, given polls are difficult, but you absolutely can't describe Ann Selzer as 'biased' when she has so often predicted very unlikely Republican wins.
If I was a Republican some serious alarm bells would be ringing.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
From a completely selfish point of view, he’s made me fall a little bit out of love with America and Americans, a feeling I’d gladly get back if I could.From your lips…as long as it goes BLUE!!
The thing that has me feeling decent is that his rallies have been much smaller and given much less coverage, and the fact that there are millions of decent people who normally vote Republican who just cannot stomach this Dictator-wannabe…like my In-Laws.
There are not many people that make me physically angry to listen to, but Trump, Vance, and the Republican mouthpiece, Scott Jennings top the list today, so here’s hoping they disappear from the airwaves after Nov 5th!!
He’s a poisonous ****.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
That answer surprises me.
Last time I read your nonsense you were all forza nato, I can see through the text you have a high level of intelligence, yet you’re a gobby deluded ****, I kind of want to take you seriously but you’re going to find out anyway.Not sure if you’re posting in the thread you think you are posting in. I’m not “still bumbling” about anything you mad ****.
Last edited:
How so? I’m not on a wind up . The Russians were kicking off since 2008That answer surprises me.
ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 21,841
“Can I get an ‘Amen’?”From a completely selfish point of view, he’s made me fall a little bit out of love with America and Americans, a feeling I’d gladly get back if I could.
He’s a poisonous ****.
I’m certainly “out of love” with about 70m adult Americans, many of whom I work with!!!
You're quoting two people each time, really showcasing your keen intellectLast time I read your nonsense you were all forza nato, I can see through the text you have a high level of intelligence, yet you’re a gobby deluded ****, I kind of want to take you seriously but you’re going to find out anyway.
Apologies.You're quoting two people each time, really showcasing your keen intellect
Not sure anything was directed at you, I simply made a few predictions, we’ll see in the coming days. It’s all complicated isn’t it?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
That’s a non-sequitur.How so? I’m not on a wind up . The Russians were kicking off since 2008
The question related to whether you believed Russia of today would, in the normal course of events, keep to an international agreement it had signed.
That is the question.
So do you?
Unequivocally yes, I thought I’d answered that already.That’s a non-sequitur.
The question related to whether you believed Russia of today would, in the normal course of events, keep to an international agreement it had signed.
That is the question.
So do you?
What do you think they want? To take Eastern Europe? Pretty sure they just want to sell gas without a load of weapon's pointed at them from their anti Russian former territories.
Source: Gazprom, I may or may not work there.
Last edited:
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
To be able to continue to send radioactive waste to to UK cities in order to kill people.What do you think they want?
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,485
No, Putin wants his own empire back.Unequivocally yes, I thought I’d answered that already.
What do you think they want? To take Eastern Europe? Pretty sure they just want to sell gas without a load of weapon's pointed at them from their anti Russian former territories.
Source: Gazprom, I may or may not work there.
Source: his own fucking words and book.
But that’s for another thread. So long as you stick around on Wednesday, that’s the main thing.
Anti Russian former territories? You mean former occupied territories who want their independence from Moscow. Id wager there’s more weapons pointing out from Russia than towards it. Na PrawdaUnequivocally yes, I thought I’d answered that already.
What do you think they want? To take Eastern Europe? Pretty sure they just want to sell gas without a load of weapon's pointed at them from their anti Russian former territories.
Source: Gazprom, I may or may not work there.
idiotarse.I know, it’s pretty obvious to everyone, I hope it’s the left kicking off, looks like it’s going to be that way.
FWIW I think Trump will win and be a disaster, but also think it’s a no win situation. I think he’s going to isolate the US economically, and I foresee a lack of intervention in foreign tensions (outside of Israel) causing a lot more drama (and I think he’ll be right in doing so).
He’ll withdraw support for Ukraine, and negotiate a peace deal where everything bar Crimea is handed back, under the conditions of NATO being disbanded and Ukraine joining the EU, probably with some sort of Russian peace keepers in the Donbas.
BRICs membership will continue to grow and US government spending will be halved; these will offset each other as far as the dollar is concerned with it slightly weakening.
I think this will be better for the US, because it’s such a big country and so self sufficient I think it’ll strengthen internally but become a much smaller player internationally, with China taking up the difference, who, I believe, will be a much more responsible power.
Hong Kong says hello. (or would if they were allowed to.)China taking up the difference, who, I believe, will be a much more responsible power.
Taiwan waiting.
And fans of Liverpool F.C not wallowing in victim mode is just as likely.
Alvin-blue-qhd
Well-Known Member
Don't worry, America will defend Taiwan, Joe Biden said.Hong Kong says hello. (or would if they were allowed to.)
Taiwan waiting.
And fans of Liverpool F.C not wallowing in victim mode is just as likely.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,485
Good. Someone needs to stop those cunts across the straight from trying to invade them.Don't worry, America will defend Taiwan, Joe Biden said.
Any reason to believe this isn't unbiased?Always good to find unbiased polling. Often it's a real struggle but then there are gems like this. #gokamala #inthebag
DutchSMOKE11
Well-Known Member
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...vote-Kamala-Harris-presidential-election.html
she's got a point. Go out and vote for Kamala. Cos Miss BJ says so....
she's got a point. Go out and vote for Kamala. Cos Miss BJ says so....