David Coote | Charged with making indecent video of a child (p57)

It is always the same when somebody starts to ask questions at PGMOL, They throw somebody under the bus,
100% bent to the core and it's so clear what goes on that you start to question yourself in what you are watching.

So by throwing Coote under the bus will not change one bit, Somebody else on the ladder will rise and take his place
Yes Coote overstepped the mark, but he was clearly setup because I think he got greedy or stepped on somebody's foot higher up the chain.

How did he overstep his mark?
 
What the actual FUCK with this club. Is there an massive liverpool FC excuse machine or something that the media of this country use?

What next! An excuse for the John Stones goal line clearance.

No wonder EVERYONE hates that club.
Even had a Villa fan in the office tell the swarm of Liverpool fans today " i'd rather any fucking club wins the title rather than your lot", he then pointed at me and said " i'd prefer City win it for the next 20 years if it stops you cunts winning it".
Made me laugh anyway & i hate Villa ha
 
Do you guys remember the Dippers-Arsenal 1-1 at Klanfield last season? When that blatant handball by Odegaard wasn't given?

Guess who was on VAR that day.
Who cares. Shit ref makes a shit decision, big deal.

Probably won't even in his top 100 shit decisions of the season, and if he wasn't such a dick only bitter dippers would still be going on about it.

And if he gave the pen and called Arteta a **** Tarquins would be using the same decision as proof he's biased against them.
 
This guy should probably choose his friends a bit more wisely. "What a provocative thing to say David! Be such a shame if this video was to be leaked...."
 
Martin Samuel, balanced as ever.

David Coote is history, but why he said what he said should trouble us all

 
Martin Samuel, balanced as ever.

David Coote is history, but why he said what he said should trouble us all

Can someone please do that archive php techy thingy on this and Martins previous article ( yesterday I think) why Pep should state his contract intentions so I can read.

Many thanks in advance, I don't want to start a trial with The Times to read. X
 
Just accept it that the integrity of the game is at question here. It was a definite penalty. Frank Lampards interview about his 3 year old kid would have whistled for that penalty.
I am definitely a doubter now. Chris K was in the VAR panel. Doubts galore.
If Everton scored that penalty, then both Liverpool and Man City were tied on 63 points each after 27 games. Liverpool lost that league by a single point.
If Everton scored that penalty? “IF, IF, IF”. Wasn’t an offside given before the handball decision anyway? As already commented on this thread?
 
Can someone please do that archive php techy thingy on this and Martins previous article ( yesterday I think) why Pep should state his contract intentions so I can read.

Many thanks in advance, I don't want to start a trial with The Times to read. X
That article on Coote was a good read, thanks::
 
Can someone please do that archive php techy thingy on this and Martins previous article ( yesterday I think) why Pep should state his contract intentions so I can read.

Many thanks in advance, I don't want to start a trial with The Times to read. X
Have you tried clicking on it?
You should be able to access it without any trial subscription.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top