PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

No evidence mate. They can say what they want and make us look guilty as hell.

On the facts and on the financial paper trail we are clean.

Remember CAS- no evidence of disguised owner funding.

So all that v innuendo, slander, copy & paste.

I know where my money is on…

It ain’t the people who have turned city into a football juggernaut. Lots of missteps have happened but this is a whole new fucking level and it’s impossible to prove without direct evidence to counter our proof.

It will soon be over.

Now what about that shit team we support? Villa next… -:)

That is right, We will always support Manchester City in good or bad times
 
Dear me, they need to grow some bollocks then.

Whatever the result turns out to be, "tortuous" LOL, that's what that father and step mother did to a little girl.
I suspect you're thinking of 'torturous'. 'Tortuous' means full of twists and turns.
But yes, I agree with your fundamental point.
 
If people are genuinely thinking of killing themselves due to football, I’d suggest they need serious medical help, which has fuck all to do with City
I'm sure nobody would consider this primarily due to football

But there will be plenty of people out there for whom City / Football are a big part of their lives, who are already in a dark place with mental illness, depression etc and this worry, concern... whatever you want to call it.... won't be helping and may be pushing them further and further in the wrong direction
 
Seems the mood has changed somewhat on this thread since Cheeseman has alledgedly spread some bullshit about a 40 point deduction. Yet here we are being linked to numerous new signings in January and a rebuild of quite large proportions. CHEESY HAS GOT AN AXE TO GRIND IN MY OPINION.
I've read a lot on here alleging that Cheeseman has been responsible for circulating damaging rumours. While I'm not stating categorically that said allegations are unfounded, it's dangerous - and potentially libellous - to post as though the claims are based on indisputable evidence. Alternatively, if anyone can supply such evidence, please share it.
 
I've read a lot on here alleging that Cheeseman has been responsible for circulating damaging rumours. While I'm not stating categorically that said allegations are unfounded, it's dangerous - and potentially libellous - to post as though the claims are based on indisputable evidence. Alternatively, if anyone can supply such evidence, please share it.
My understanding is cheeseman hasn't posted the information anywhere but told someone he knew -possibly in confidence - and that person shared the information.

Maybe he did say it, maybe he alluded to as a possibility and it was misinterpreted as being fact or maybe he said no such thing.
 
I've read a lot on here alleging that Cheeseman has been responsible for circulating damaging rumours. While I'm not stating categorically that said allegations are unfounded, it's dangerous - and potentially libellous - to post as though the claims are based on indisputable evidence. Alternatively, if anyone can supply such evidence, please share it.


Didn't he put all of his eggs in one basket and call the CAS decision a day before the decision came out?
 
Last edited:
Seems the mood has changed somewhat on this thread since Cheeseman has alledgedly spread some bullshit about a 40 point deduction. Yet here we are being linked to numerous new signings in January and a rebuild of quite large proportions. CHEESY HAS GOT AN AXE TO GRIND IN MY OPINION.
The problem is that due to the virtually complete absence of any info on the case, any snippet is latched on to. Now either he's said something or he hasn't and if he has we don't know in what context. I'm getting the impression a few people have an axe to grind with cheesy ( not you) in fact. I think it was in relation to the CAS ruling that he came in for some quite vitriolic treatment on here. It was a bit OTT.
 
Dear me, they need to grow some bollocks then.

Whatever the result turns out to be, "tortuous" LOL, that's what that father and step mother did to a little girl.
Mother of God!
Are you an admin?

A rag from my local village killed himself after a football game, I'll go and knock on his son's door and tell him that his dad should have grown some bollocks.

However my original point stands. City/Khaldoon/Media Officer (or whoever) should have done more to dilute the abuse because regardless of the eventual outcome, the damage has already been done.
 
My understanding is cheeseman hasn't posted the information anywhere but told someone he knew -possibly in confidence - and that person shared the information.

Maybe he did say it, maybe he alluded to as a possibility and it was misinterpreted as being fact or maybe he said no such thing.
Is it not likely someone just got the wrong end of the stick and it’s a genuine misunderstanding?
 
Not a chance we are getting relegated.
Not a chance we're getting a 40 point deduction.

Can I reiterate that we have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG.

This is a smear campaign and a witch hunt concocted and carried out by the red cartel, the puppet that is Masters and the British media.

They are relentless in their task to obliterate us and are trying every trick in the book to put a stain on our success.

Not to mention the red cartel clubs owners and the Premier League aren't happy that they aren't front and centre anymore.

I trust the club, I trust the owners and I believe it when they say we have done nothing sinister or dodgy.

All of a sudden these cranks on YouTube have suddenly turned into financial experts and law students and seem to know what is happening and that we're going to get absolutely battered. It's all about getting clicks as they know every other club and their fans will be lapping it up because soon, when it's all been put to bed and we're found not guilty these pricks on the socials will dry up like a desert in a heatwave.
 
The way I look at it no one yet knows anything . A very few high up at the club may have an inkling as how it's going, that's it. The IC have got to pour over the evidence and come to a conclusion, so any so called itk that claim this, that or the other are just guessing or bullshitting. It's pointless getting excited or depressed by snippets of info that someone was told by someone that knows someone, who's dog works at the Etihad.
 
Propaganda. Launched by the yanks that now own 50% of premier league. Why would they not want the seven times winners out of the way. Control the prem and control the media. Surprised they've not dug trenches, or sent in the tanks.
 
where did he post that? or is it others spreading that rumour? sounds like a chinese whisper to me.
We’ve been through all this the other week but you obviously missed it.

While talk of a 40 point deduction is almost certainly a Chinese whisper, Cheeseman relaying the story wasn’t a Chinese whisper. He said it and he knows he said it. He told a mate of mine the other week and said that his source was someone “high up” at the club. The person he told was hardly going to keep it to himself was he? No, of course he wasn’t. Especially as that person, like Cheeseman, has plenty of contacts in the media and also a couple at the club. So the first thing he did was check Cheeseman’s story out with Tolmie who he’s been mates with for 30 years and to try and find out if Tolmie had heard anything along similar lines. Tolmie reverted back to him saying Cheesy was chatting shit. Since then, Cheesy has subsequently denied ever saying it. I find that disappointing to be honest. Unlike some on here, I’ve always had a lot of time for him.

Now it’s up to you if you want to believe the above but Tolmie can back some of it up, and although he himself didn’t hear it from Cheeseman, the person who did is a long-standing mate of his and isn’t going to make shit like that up. For some reason, I got pelters on here from some quarters when all I’ve ever done on here is post any info in good faith. I’ve posted positive and negative snippets on here about this case. I bet if Cheeseman had told my mate something wholly positive instead, those same detractors on here would’ve no doubt been wanking themselves silly about it. In fact, it can be argued that what I posted wasn’t entirely negative anyway because I made sure I also posted Tolmie’s rebuttal.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top