marco
Well-Known Member
Thanks for the input mate
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Have we got a new noodle partner?Hate to be one of those people but heard another positive soft signal (not transfer related) this morning. Seems to me that it would be incompatible with a finding of serious wrong doing at the club. I can't say anything specific but consistent with the other soft signals (being something in the background that would seem unlikely if a seriously negative outcome was coming from the case).
To be honest, I'm not even sure "soft signals" is the right terminology for what I have in mind.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
sit on top deck of bus ?Pele used to recommend some good medication that could help you all with your soft signals
if you know you know To the regiment
Merry Christmas everyone. Feeling the Xmas spirit now. Let’s thrash EvertonHate to be one of those people but heard another positive soft signal (not transfer related) this morning. Seems to me that it would be incompatible with a finding of serious wrong doing at the club. I can't say anything specific but consistent with the other soft signals (being something in the background that would seem unlikely if a seriously negative outcome was coming from the case).
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
Hate to be one of those people but heard another positive soft signal (not transfer related) this morning. Seems to me that it would be incompatible with a finding of serious wrong doing at the club. I can't say anything specific but consistent with the other soft signals (being something in the background that would seem unlikely if a seriously negative outcome was coming from the case).
The people involved in the hearing for and against have been appointed to new projects in the new year? Or the club has now invested in a new head for Moonchester as the old one smells a bit.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
As in it's stronger than 'soft signals' or weaker?To be honest, I'm not even sure "soft signals" is the right terminology for what I have in mind.
chris85mcfc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 6,948
You do realise, that you're the only person that can be 'one of those people'.Hate to be one of those people but heard another positive soft signal (not transfer related) this morning. Seems to me that it would be incompatible with a finding of serious wrong doing at the club. I can't say anything specific but consistent with the other soft signals (being something in the background that would seem unlikely if a seriously negative outcome was coming from the case).
The whole reason we are here is because City's security team "failed massive".What that says to me is theres over the top security policies in place which causes the weaking of overall security of the business. If you ever feel the need to use insecure methods in business then the security team have failed massive and needs replacing
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
This soft signal is giving me a very a hard Christmas erection.
You know the rules.
Big Joe Corrigan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 4,702
A Christmas log.This soft signal is giving me a very a hard Christmas erection.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,915
Which is what we all said in the first place unless I am mistaken.
Not really- this makes some points that are simply wrongWhich is what we all said in the first place unless I am mistaken.
dromoreblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 676
You teaseHate to be one of those people but heard another positive soft signal (not transfer related) this morning. Seems to me that it would be incompatible with a finding of serious wrong doing at the club. I can't say anything specific but consistent with the other soft signals (being something in the background that would seem unlikely if a seriously negative outcome was coming from the case).
Brightwell Bros.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 8,624
Sit on your hands and no touching while Stefan is dancing for me?You know the rules.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,915
Not really- this makes some points that are simply wrong
About the standard of proof?
Never mind. It doesn't matter. I think we know where we are with the 115 case.
Scaring Europe to Death
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 5,144
Not listened to that Fat Talksport Gobshite since returning from the 4-2 defeat at Leicester and his insistence that Pep had already been sussed out by his PL counterparts
He was talking bollocks then and he's talking bollocks now.
He was talking bollocks then and he's talking bollocks now.
ScottSinclair
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jun 2015
- Messages
- 7,411
Maybe I'm a bit dim, but the fact that we haven't been asset stripping the club for 3 years already were really the only soft signal I ever neededHate to be one of those people but heard another positive soft signal (not transfer related) this morning. Seems to me that it would be incompatible with a finding of serious wrong doing at the club. I can't say anything specific but consistent with the other soft signals (being something in the background that would seem unlikely if a seriously negative outcome was coming from the case).
Yes. It is simply not close to the criminal standardAbout the standard of proof?
Never mind. It doesn't matter. I think we know where we are with the 115 case.
Prophet of Doom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2007
- Messages
- 1,921
People posting that Pinto has held hacked emails back as security for himself is absolute bollocks.
What he has released through Footy Leaks and Luanda Leaks has cost many of the targets untold losses of multi millions and criminal investigations in many countries.
If we lose the 115/130 case then the financial loss to City would be in the hundreds of millions, the loss of value in the club and CFG could be in the billions with unrepairable reputational damage.
The idea that he has just given a teaser and holding back the juicy stuff on any of the targets is nonsense.
He’s balls deep already and nothing he has held back would make a difference.
Posturing by him and his lawyer about being a whilstleblower is simple PR for his next criminal case where he will hopefully get prison time.
What he has released through Footy Leaks and Luanda Leaks has cost many of the targets untold losses of multi millions and criminal investigations in many countries.
If we lose the 115/130 case then the financial loss to City would be in the hundreds of millions, the loss of value in the club and CFG could be in the billions with unrepairable reputational damage.
The idea that he has just given a teaser and holding back the juicy stuff on any of the targets is nonsense.
He’s balls deep already and nothing he has held back would make a difference.
Posturing by him and his lawyer about being a whilstleblower is simple PR for his next criminal case where he will hopefully get prison time.