PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Father Paul said:
Exactly. I could say a lot on this, but freedom of speech not been great these days in Broken Britain, I will abide. Suffice to say geo-politics is clearly entwined in PL governance.
Click to expand...
You have the right to say what you want as long as you don't libal people, interfere with judicial proceedings, incite violence or riot, etc, we don't have absolute freedom of speech no country does but you have the right to make fair comment, we have enough problems in this country without people professing their "Free Speech Martyrdom" Different places will have different rules like this forum for example and most Social Media sites
 
I'm Blue said:
www.theguardian.com

Manchester United confident on financial fair play despite £113m loss

Manchester United believe they comply with Premier League and Uefa financial rules despite the £113.2m net loss in their latest accounts
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
“Manchester United are confident they comply with Premier League and Uefa financial rules despite posting a £113.2m net loss in their latest accounts. It is the fifth consecutive year United have made an annual loss, with the club £115.5m in the red in 2021-22 and £42.1m in 2022-23.”
Make it make sense!!
That’s £270.8m losses over the last 3 seasons.
They call it ‘allowances’ I call it red cartel corruption.
Click to expand...
Not sure how anyone can square five consecutive years of losses with organic growth and spending what you earn ffs!
 
Damanino said:
no PSR cheaters this time then?

guess those hotel sales by Chelsea all approved and and arms length strange transfers end of June between Forest, Villa, Chelsea, Newcastle for inflated prices for home grown talents moved around also all accepted without much checking and all above water.
I guess we will see some more of these transfer again in June.
Click to expand...
If we did what Chelsea have done back in 2013 to get passed ffp the book would have been thrown at us! Oh and we admitted to paying players of the books so they would come to our club! Just think how the media would respond? how much it would of been plastered all over media consistently!? Chelsea though next to nothing no outrage of what they've done!?
 
Ducado said:
You have the right to say what you want as long as you don't libal people, interfere with judicial proceedings, incite violence or riot, etc, we don't have absolute freedom of speech no country does but you have the right to make fair comment, we have enough problems in this country without people professing their "Free Speech Martyrdom" Different places will have different rules like this forum for example and most Social Media sites
Click to expand...
Purely in the interests of free speech, I would like to say “The rags are a complete bunch of horrible cheating bastards.” There, that’s better.
 
ancoats said:
Manchester City should have made it all stop after the CAS verdict was released with court cases brought to anybody calling us cheats, The media and Sky BBC talksport should have been put in their places but the £10million in fines left the door wide open for another attack, Why on earth settle for a fine of £10 million for not corresponding, when it's a 2 way thing and they had to find us guilty of cheating, because all of our accounts was released to the public and Uefa

When you clearly stated we had done nothing wrong but take a fine of £10 million for not corresponding then it was cannon fodder
Click to expand...
Since we were not guilty, there was no need to cooperate with anyone.
The non-cooperation charge was nonsense.
 
calumdown said:
good day, blues.

i've not been on the thread for about a week

would anyone be kind enough to summarise what i've missed?
Click to expand...
Simon ‘the expert’ Jordan has heard we’re not very confident.
Slbsn has heard we are confident.
If we buy anyone in January, we’re guilty.
If we don’t buy anyone in January, we’re guilty.
We’re going to win.
We’re going to lose.
We’re going to get relegated.
We’re not going to get anything as we’re innocent.
What about the rags?
What about the Chavs?
Gary Neville and Jamie Carragher are *****
Think that’s about it.
 
The Light Was Yellow Sir said:
Simon ‘the expert’ Jordan has heard we’re not very confident.
Slbsn has heard we are confident.
If we buy anyone in January, we’re guilty.
If we don’t buy anyone in January, we’re guilty.
We’re going to win.
We’re going to lose.
We’re going to get relegated.
We’re not going to get anything as we’re innocent.
What about the rags?
What about the Chavs?
Gary Neville and Jamie Carragher are *****
Think that’s about it.
Click to expand...
Excellent, concise summary
 
Ducado said:
You have the right to say what you want as long as you don't libal people, interfere with judicial proceedings, incite violence or riot, etc, we don't have absolute freedom of speech no country does but you have the right to make fair comment, we have enough problems in this country without people professing their "Free Speech Martyrdom" Different places will have different rules like this forum for example and most Social Media sites
Click to expand...
Shouldn’t have said this mate. I found it offensive because I’m identifying as easily offended this week.
 
The Light Was Yellow Sir said:
Simon ‘the expert’ Jordan has heard we’re not very confident.
Slbsn has heard we are confident.
If we buy anyone in January, we’re guilty.
If we don’t buy anyone in January, we’re guilty.
We’re going to win.
We’re going to lose.
We’re going to get relegated.
We’re not going to get anything as we’re innocent.
What about the rags?
What about the Chavs?
Gary Neville and Jamie Carragher are *****
Think that’s about it.
Click to expand...

Fantastic ,and accurate,summary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top