PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[M18CTID]

I think there's two cases, the self admitting one and then a second one that's currently being investigated. I wonder if the PL have gone to town on these and requesting all emails and docs to find any skeletons in the closet?

Yep - some more info came out about alleged third party payments on top of the self-reported part so that could be adding to the delay. It took the PL 4 years to charge us so I'm guessing the Chelsea one has a while to go yet before a decision is made on charging, etc.

Stefan's thinking on the self-admitted part was that Chelsea are in deeper shit than City because much of it is similar to what we've been accused of and a punishment will have to be meted out for it, whereas we've always proclaimed our innocence and have said we have evidence to back that up.

 

[dickie davies]

They're at it again

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

They're at it again

View attachment 143194

Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.

 

[dickie davies]

They're at it again

View attachment 143194

Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.

 

[cheekybids]

Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.

I still don’t understand who pays these fucking nonse websites to advertise a product on a story written by a fukwit.

It’s not as if you click on it to see if City are getting dry bummed but within moments you’ve been hypnotised by a Dewalt Nail Gun & before you can say 115 you’ve bought the fucker.

 

[KS55]

Something doesn't sit right about no clubs failing. I can't believe this

Especially that cheating City…oh.

 

[KS55]

This line is telling
"They have also been told United are "tight" when it comes to their PSR position.
The detail of that - as with all clubs - is vague"
Why should it be vague? Why isn't it clear and transparent for all to see? Well we all know the answer to that, don't we.

The PSR submission from each club should be published.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.

Wake up, wake up, wake up it’s the first of tha month.

 

[Elbow beards]

It’s not as if you click on it to see if City are getting dry bummed but within moments you’ve been hypnotised by a Thai lady boy & before you can say 115 you’ve bought the fucker.

 

[cheekybids]

I call that an impulse purchase ;)

 

[Roachy]

They're at it again

View attachment 143194

There was an identical one the other day with Middlesbrough being the benefactor. It's bonkers.

 

[Bald fraud]

The PSR submission from each club should be published.

Definitely! Come on get them all made public and let’s have a look if they’re all squeaky clean what have they got to hide? Won’t hold my breath

 

[Blueknows]

The PSR submission from each club should be published.

Id like to see the rags , what is it 270m losses ? when the limit is 105 over 3 years , hidden in plain sight ffs

 

[abu13]

Id like to see the rags , what is it 270m losses ? when the limit is 105 over 3 years , hidden in plain sight ffs

Something as simple as a table of each club that states the last 3 year losses and then listing allowances granted, eg womens team, covid etc. At least that would allow for some comparison

 

[eyalluvitt]

Are you refering to RACISM against very successful brown people who've ecliped the red yank cabal in every aspect of sporting enterprise for over 10 years......or wot ??

Not this time as PSG have similar looking owners to us

 

[Elbow beards]

Id like to see the rags , what is it 270m losses ? when the limit is 105 over 3 years , hidden in plain sight ffs

170 million for mouse traps and log flume maintenance.

 

[eyalluvitt]

Selling £10 bags of crack on the street corner in the pouring rain at 4am on a Monday has more dignity attached to it than being paid to write headlines like that for a living.

Whatever next, “Third Lanark fc anxiously awaits the outcome of Man City’s historical FFP charges case”

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Something as simple as a table of each club that states the last 3 year losses and then listing allowances granted, eg womens team, covid etc. At least that would allow for some comparison

I suspect that this is the last thing that the PL would want to release as currently they are able to conceal any issues which their favoured clubs may be experiencing, before "producing solutions " to make the problems go away.

The cabal members certainly don't want transparency regarding their operations.

 

[Elbow beards]

How fucking tedious, does anyone fall for this shit?

 

[thegoatsthegoat]

I am a rookie but how can it be public news that they have lost 270m in that three year period, but no explanation as to why they haven't been punished or what their "allowances" are to then make them compliant?

How isn't this highlighted anywhere? How can this information not be disclosed?