Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
You
You only wrote that so you could say “untrammeled” didn’t you?Exactly. The CAS award baldly stated 12 times that there was no evidence against City on the Etihad sponsorship issue. That was followed by outright lies and misleadingly packaged half-truths, such as:
If we prevail (by which I mean avoid any penalty other than a monetary one) in these proceedings, the bad-faith actors in the media who deliberately try to promulgate this kind of stuff will once again be spreading their poison. Other media figures with no knowledge of the issues may be swayed, while more may well decide that such deceit will earn them clicks. And the idiots among opposing fans whose hate for us is untrammeled will eagerly lap it up.
- City selected two of the arbitrators (the parties appointed one each and agreed on a third, as the rules provide);
- UEFA's statute of limitations applied when there'd be no limitation issues under PL proceedings (despite restrictions in the Limitation Act applying in PL proceedings);
- the CAS standard of proof was too high (you don't meet any standard of proof if there's no evidence, so this is an irrelevant point); and
- UEFA were remiss in failing to appeal the CAS award (though under the Swiss legal system, an appeal would almost certainly have been laughed out of court).
We'll need a major PR strategy if we prevail, of course, though there's no point in entertaining even for a minute a hope that we can win the hearts and minds of the kind of scum I've referred to in the preceding paragraph. No, we seek to present the actual facts of the case to reasonable people who are open minded enough to want to know the truth, while simultaneously delivering a big, smiling 'Fuck you!' to the rest of them.
