Film changes

Blue Maverick

Well-Known Member
Joined
6 Aug 2010
Messages
25,198
A new version of Crocodile Dundee is been issued, it will be the only version going forward available to purchase, I think it’s going to far now, just out a disclaimer on the thing at the start if you must but stop trying to alter history.
The film now opens with text acknowledging the traditional custodians of the land, which is appropriately respectful given it depicts Indigenous culture in the Territory, even if it might rankle those lobbying to ditch welcome to Country ceremonies.

An early sequence that had Mick admitting he didn’t know his exact age but thinking he is about 40 has gone. While it makes no difference to the story, the thinking might have been that it unnecessarily highlights the age difference between Mick and the younger Sue.
Some scenes in Kakadu seem to be extended, including the corroboree that Mick attends daubed in tribal paint. But the most notable changes come when Mick reaches New York.
After he meets two street workers, their angry pimp used to charge up, asking if Mick wanted to “f---” one of them. That’s been toned down to “screw”.
Gone is the most dubious scene in the film showing Mick grabbing a bar patron in the groin and declaring “that was a guy, a guy dressed up like a sheila” while someone else yells “f*ggot”.

In a statement before the screening, production company Rimfire Films said, “Some years ago, Paramount Pictures and other distributors requested the reference to the crossdresser be edited from the original film, as they found it offensive. We agreed to that request”.
A later sequence when Mick does the same thing to a woman at a party, saying, “I was just making sure”, has also been cut. Other than lingering on that woman smiling at Mick for a moment after she has been groped, both edits have been made without changing the flow of the film.
After the credits, there is now a slide saying, “In loving memory of John Cornell”.
All the other famous moments in the film remain, including the full “that’s a knife” scene that finishes with Mick slashing the jacket of a mugger.
The restoration highlights cinematographer Russell Boyd’s stunning shots of the Territory and reveals a few details – such as Mick reaching for his knife but finding it missing when confronted by the pimp’s offsiders in a dark alley – that were difficult to pick up even on DVD.

As a charming, very Australian comedy, it all still works.
 
As long as there is a warning about smoking scenes, I'm sick to death of seeing young kids on 60 Park Drive the day after watching a film or netfilx series.
Surely with special effects they can remove all smoking from every programme ever made.

Humphey Bogart could be made to look like he's blowing up a balloon for a charity function before he fills the gangster full of lead surely?

As for Dundee I'm pretty sure people are capable of realising it was made in a different time.

It's not a films job anyhow to promote modern day values onto its audience.
 
The fact that they have to do this is frightening, trying to change history to coincide with modern sensibilities is insane, if a person cant understand that something happened in THE PAST and things were different then than how they are now, then taking scenes from a film or putting in notes to explain it to them wont help, they are already too far gone and should just be ignored.
 
Not a change, but a faux ban. Try and find Dogma to watch anywhere in the UK.... You can buy the DVD/Blu-ray but try to find it on any streaming services and you will fail. it has been considered too offensive by most services/TV channels to show.
 
Not a change, but a faux ban. Try and find Dogma to watch anywhere in the UK.... You can buy the DVD/Blu-ray but try to find it on any streaming services and you will fail. it has been considered too offensive by most services/TV channels to show.
is is the scene where chris rock says jesus still owes him 12 bucks lol
 
Is this a MSM thing? Where we all have to conform to the standards they want us to have?

Fucks me off. They are putting a straight jacket on life and existence. Telling us what is acceptable and what isn't according to their ruleset. Altering history itself in its aim to make everything the way they want it. It's double think stuff. History is so important to learn from, some just want to sweep it all under the carpet.
 
As you say, a message before the film starts should be fine, from what I've seen it's what Disney animation do, it's a good teaching moment to learn from the past.

Film is art and I hate this retrospective intervention. I'm not sure who wins with this whitewashing of history, pretending something never happened, how is that the best message moving forward?

I also think you shouldn't be allowed to keep the original title of the film. It should have to be called 'Crocodile Dundee: The 2025 cut'.
 
Really irritates me. I know it sounds mad calling crocodile Dundee "art", but people put a lot of time and effort into making it and it should be respected. Where is the line when it comes to changing things from the past? There's plenty of paintings that have "offensive" imagery, do we go back and paint over them?
Im sick to death of being treated like im a child, I can make my own judgements on right and wrong and have the ability to see things as being of their time.
Just because a drunk buy in a bar in Crocodile Dundee calls somebody a f*ggot its not going to change my views on gay people, or make me go out calling them names. Its ridiculous.

Everything is so censored these days. Even YouTube is mental, you can't have an honest discussion about anything on there because of the list of words that might get your video demonetised. It worries me where we are heading
 
When was the last time any of you thought about Crocodile Dundee? That's why they're doing it. Could just remaster if and re-release it, but if we do some bullshit censorship, we'll generate a load of free advertising. It wouldn't surprise me if they're testing the waters for a remake.

If it was a kids' film, I would understand this sort of thing, but it was a 15 in the UK. If I remember rightly, it's got scenes with drugs, prostitution and quite a bit of strong language. If you're old enough to watch it, you're old enough to know that the 80s was different.
 
The past digitally remastered and cleansed just in time for euthanasia soylent green and the great upcoming war between humans and AI.

Censor that you cunts.

giphy.gif
 
Not a film but on a television channel, they show programmes like Steptoe and Son, Till Death Us Do Part and Benny Hill. Not to everyone tastes today and probably not suitable in today’s society but what they do is put a banner on the screen saying it was filmed at a time that doesn’t reflect modern times. In other words it’s giving you fair warning that you might not like it. I think that’s fair enough.
 
Not a film but on a television channel, they show programmes like Steptoe and Son, Till Death Us Do Part and Benny Hill. Not to everyone tastes today and probably not suitable in today’s society but what they do is put a banner on the screen saying it was filmed at a time that doesn’t reflect modern times. In other words it’s giving you fair warning that you might not like it. I think that’s fair enough.


I don't think it's the weapons that watch idiot island or eat a kangaroos arse with the penis of a Koala that are complaining though so I don't know who is.

Maybe it's the ones who watch dancing with perverts?
 
Last edited:
I wish they did this for loads of movies. Call it a parent version.

There are so many movies that I'd love my kids to watch but they have a grenade of inappropriateness.

For example in The Shawshank Redemption there's an erotic scene ar the start and the attempted rape scene. I think bothe could be implied without seeing the scenes as they are and the movie would be just as good as well as being more accessible to u12s or whatever.

The original could still exist.

In this digital age why not imo.

Then again how they'd make any money yo pay for their effort is beyond me.

But it'd be nice.
 
I wish they did this for loads of movies. Call it a parent version.

There are so many movies that I'd love my kids to watch but they have a grenade of inappropriateness.

For example in The Shawshank Redemption there's an erotic scene ar the start and the attempted rape scene. I think bothe could be implied without seeing the scenes as they are and the movie would be just as good as well as being more accessible to u12s or whatever.

The original could still exist.

In this digital age why not imo.

Then again how they'd make any money yo pay for their effort is beyond me.

But it'd be nice.

The look away now tactic always worked for me.

Nowadays while parents are doing that their kids are on the internet googling Camel porn.
 
Everything is so censored these days. Even YouTube is mental, you can't have an honest discussion about anything on there because of the list of words that might get your video demonetised. It worries me where we are heading
Yeah, it's enough to worry you to Unalived
:D

(unalived being one of my pet hates that people on Youtube use)
 
It’s PC gone nuts. Watched Home Alone this past Christmas time. The scene where Kevin is going through Buzz’ stuff. He finds a goofy picture of his “ girlfriend “. Kevin says something like, “ Whoa Buzz your girlfriend…WOOF!!” It was hilarious and things young lads would say but heaven forbid a girl gets some negative reinforcement!!

So many tv shows and movies you couldn’t make today. Hill Street Blues one of the most popular shows on network tv in the mid 80s used the word ****** more than once. Wouldn’t be allowed today.

Now that’s not how I talk but that’s how people do talk and after all we are told film making is art. Sometimes art can have an ugly side.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top