I read recently that only 3 PL clubs are majority British owned. Since the takeover of Everton in December,
half the clubs in the PL are now majority owned by Americans. In terms of voting for rule changes, it should raise obvious concerns: 'Lets bring in draft picks and no relegations. All in agreement, gimme a hell yeah!'
If half of PL clubs were owned by billionaires from the Persian Gulf, I'm pretty sure our press would not think 'Tyranny of the majority' was an absurd point to make at all. That will never happen because we know the press would go bonkers and send people into a blind panic about it, before it got to that. However, if rival fans were to actually humour the scenario, it might actually click, finally.
Besides that, not everyone did vote in favour. Even if only 1 club voted against, if the rules are unlawful, then they need to be changed. No point trotting out 'all clubs voted on the rules, so just accept it'. That's nonsense.