PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The “Football Finance Expert” is an idiot and knows NOTHING more than anyone else, and is actually making himself look bad by spouting this BS in the media…but it keeps the lights on at his house, so…!

Disagree. He knows more than most and has remained balanced from the start. I don't think he's spouted any BS. If we're found guilty, we will almost certainly be relegated - that's not too controversial.

He's repeated himself several times that the charges may not be proven and as such we'll be innocent, in which case the PL will face major repercussions of their own.

Don't mind Kieran Maguire at all. Of all the journalists or media personalities worthy of criticism, I wouldn't be rushing to have a go at him.
 
Disagree. He knows more than most and has remained balanced from the start. I don't think he's spouted any BS. If we're found guilty, we will almost certainly be relegated - that's not too controversial.

He's repeated himself several times that the charges may not be proven and as such we'll be innocent, in which case the PL will face major repercussions of their own.

Don't mind Kieran Maguire at all. Of all the journalists or media personalities worthy of criticism, I wouldn't be rushing to have a go at him.
When something FACTUAL AND ACTIONABLE comes out, then maybe his “expertise” will be valuable. Until then, he’s flying blind…like the rest of us!

ANYONE could have said exactly the same thing he said. Anyone!

As for the bold italics above, assumes far too much! Guilty of WHAT???
 
When something FACTUAL AND ACTIONABLE comes out, then maybe his “expertise” will be valuable. Until then, he’s flying blind…like the rest of us!

ANYONE could have said exactly the same thing he said. Anyone!

As for the bold italics above, assumes far too much! Guilty of WHAT???

Of course he's flying blind like the rest of us, but at least he's had the decency to mention this is a difficult case for the PL to prove and they might not be able to. Others have us hung, draw and quartered already.
 
Of course he's flying blind like the rest of us, but at least he's had the decency to mention this is a difficult case for the PL to prove and they might not be able to. Others have us hung, draw and quartered already.
Faint praise. How he gets to a punishment without knowing more than you or me is not what I would term “exercising expertise.”
 
When something FACTUAL AND ACTIONABLE comes out, then maybe his “expertise” will be valuable. Until then, he’s flying blind…like the rest of us!

ANYONE could have said exactly the same thing he said. Anyone!

As for the bold italics above, assumes far too much! Guilty of WHAT???
You could argue the same of Stefan. Maguire has answered the question what would happen if we are found guilty. Stefan and all the experts on here would give the same answer.

Maguire isn't the problem. The article selectively quoting him is the problem, so just ignore it.
 
Disagree. He knows more than most and has remained balanced from the start. I don't think he's spouted any BS. If we're found guilty, we will almost certainly be relegated - that's not too controversial.

He's repeated himself several times that the charges may not be proven and as such we'll be innocent, in which case the PL will face major repercussions of their own.

Don't mind Kieran Maguire at all. Of all the journalists or media personalities worthy of criticism, I wouldn't be rushing to have a go at him.
Maguire is getting a lot of shit, but the “journalists” are selectively quoting him (just as Talksport have done with Stefan) and dreaming up clickbait headlines.
Looking at his comments in full he’s always been balanced/fair to City.
It’s the media that’s the cunts here !
 
Disagree. He knows more than most and has remained balanced from the start. I don't think he's spouted any BS. If we're found guilty, we will almost certainly be relegated - that's not too controversial.

He's repeated himself several times that the charges may not be proven and as such we'll be innocent, in which case the PL will face major repercussions of their own.

Don't mind Kieran Maguire at all. Of all the journalists or media personalities worthy of criticism, I wouldn't be rushing to have a go at him.
If his headline was his last sentence, then nobody would click on it.
 
Maguire is getting a lot of shit, but the “journalists” are selectively quoting him (just as Talksport have done with Stefan) and dreaming up clickbait headlines.
Looking at his comments in full he’s always been balanced/fair to City.
It’s the media that’s the cunts here !

A lot of his stuff is very balanced, he's clearly knowledgeable, and I enjoyed reading his book, but Football Insider has got to be one of the worst sites around for click bait headlines.

Given he's been involved in the site for years, and was one of the main "insiders" when it first started getting big, I don't think he can blame anyone if his words are used for other click bait articles.
 
Of course he's flying blind like the rest of us, but at least he's had the decency to mention this is a difficult case for the PL to prove and they might not be able to. Others have us hung, draw and quartered already.
Would it be a difficult case to prove because there is no evidence being produced, indeed no evidence whatsoever to back up their charges. If he is the expert perhaps he could say exactly why it is a difficult case to prove not leave it like their is evidence but the PL cannot access it. He is being quoted because he is willing to comment on it and allow himself to say what they need.
 
Last edited:
You could argue the same of Stefan. Maguire has answered the question what would happen if we are found guilty. Stefan and all the experts on here would give the same answer.

Maguire isn't the problem. The article selectively quoting him is the problem, so just ignore it.
I would have done had it not been on here in large bold font! Like my wife, I generally don’t waste my time with premature ejaculators!
 
Old guy on bus:”City are found innocent.”
Me: “How do you know?”
Old guy: “ A bloke I know who posts on Bluemoon heard it from a mate of a guy at CFA.”

I’m telling you, City have definitely been found innocent, it’s kosher. I heard it from the horse’s mouth.
 
Would it be a difficult case to prove because there is no evidence being produced indeed no evidence whatsoever to back up their charges. If he is the expert perhaps he could say exactly why it is a difficult case to prove not leave it like their is evidence but the PL cannot access it. He is being quoted because he is willing to comment on it and allow himself to say what they need.
Yep, these people are hedging their bets. As I've said in another post, it needs to be asked, if they're experts, why a lot of them didn't foresee the CAS verdict, or why, for 17 years, they never discussed the PL allowing owners to lend themselves interest-free loans.
 
Only if we lost.

Although Pep might give the game away in a conference if we’ve won!
That would be the best way to find out, in all fairness. Pep accidentally on purpose casually dropping some shit. Haaland later doing one of his cold abrupt dismissals.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top