SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,444
LolBroken link
LolBroken link
The Meakers!!Rent- A -Ghost?
It would be hilarious if ADUG bought, or even tried to buy, the hand wringing Guardian. The Torygraph less so.I knew someone would tell me, I dont care which publication it was tbh, its just posh lies.
Mr Claypole and the granny from the flash adverts,along with Audrey from Coranation Street..They were the days…
Truth is the first casualty of war....and we're in a war !!Definitely, good shout…..
Hopefully not for much longer!Is Richard Masters ‘a senior figure in football’?
Miss Popoff :)Mr Claypole and the granny from the flash adverts,along with Audrey from Coranation Street..
Is this true.Old guy on bus:”City are found innocent.”
Me: “How do you know?”
Old guy: “ A bloke I know who posts on Bluemoon heard it from a mate of a guy at CFA.”
I’m telling you, City have definitely been found innocent, it’s kosher. I heard it from the horse’s mouth.
why the fuck would ruud van nistellroy know?Old guy on bus:”City are found innocent.”
Me: “How do you know?”
Old guy: “ A bloke I know who posts on Bluemoon heard it from a mate of a guy at CFA.”
I’m telling you, City have definitely been found innocent, it’s kosher. I heard it from the horse’s mouth.
Is this true.
Only on 4336 of the 8683 pages of this threadIs this true.
Prestwich Blue was saying David Conn hadn't written anything about City for a few years after City had had a few words with some of the media behind the scenes. I wonder if he's been writing a book for publication to coincide with the culmination of the case. I have a feeling it's still got some legs in it yet. Hopefully, if the Tribunals rule in favour of City, stronger action will be taken against those people than has happened up till now.
Can I do the foreward?The above appeared in the media thread yesterday. It's gone a few pages back there and I thought in any case that this thread is a better place for a reply. Frankly, I very much doubt that Conn has been working on a book so far as I don't think sufficient information about the case is available to anyone at the moment except those directly involved in it.
However, it did occur to me that this thread has been the best informed resource of all about the case. I'd argue vigorously that someone wanting to understand what the case is about and how the Panel will approach it would have been much better advised to pick their way judiciously through this thread rather than rely on anything in the mainstream media except Stefan's contributions. And his views are given in more detail in this thread anyway.
If the outcome is a decent one for he club, maybe someone should wait for the make a book out of the foremost contributions from this thread. I don't claim that all of it hits the heights by any means - far from it! - but the best posts in this thread would be more than a match than anything that the mainstream sports media can produce.
I can imagine people reading this and thinking that I can't be serious becaise it's just mental. I do actually mean it. I can see it now. A working title of 'City On Trial!' with a subtitle of 'How the Blue Moon forum saw the attempt to stitch up City'. Who's in?
I was speaking to an absolute imbecile the other day who had shit for brains and he said City were guilty. I asked him what City had actually done that made him think that way. He said he didn't know, but he'd heard Jamie Carragher refer to the emails. We are doomed.
Bit harsh on @Bez :-)Brainless moron taking advice from a brainless moron - what could possibly go wrong.
You could do the first draft now. There is nobody better than you to do it. I look forward to the publication date.The above appeared in the media thread yesterday. It's gone a few pages back there and I thought in any case that this thread is a better place for a reply. Frankly, I very much doubt that Conn has been working on a book so far as I don't think sufficient information about the case is available to anyone at the moment except those directly involved in it.
However, it did occur to me that this thread has been the best informed resource of all about the case. I'd argue vigorously that someone wanting to understand what the case is about and how the Panel will approach it would have been much better advised to pick their way judiciously through this thread rather than rely on anything in the mainstream media except Stefan's contributions. And his views are given in more detail in this thread anyway.
If the outcome is a decent one for he club, maybe someone should wait for the make a book out of the foremost contributions from this thread. I don't claim that all of it hits the heights by any means - far from it! - but the best posts in this thread would be more than a match than anything that the mainstream sports media can produce.
I can imagine people reading this and thinking that I can't be serious becaise it's just mental. I do actually mean it. I can see it now. A working title of 'City On Trial!' with a subtitle of 'How the Blue Moon forum saw the attempt to stitch up City'. Who's in?
We have enough forewards.Can I do the foreward?
Who needs a left back when you've got Lord pannick defending youWe have enough forewards.
a right back and left back is what we need.
It's surely Oscar winning Hollywood material. Just wondering who'd play Masters, Delaney, Harris x 2, et al. George Clooney could be Khaldoon, Matt Damon Pep, Jim Broadbent Lord Pannick.