The above appeared in the media thread yesterday. It's gone a few pages back there and I thought in any case that this thread is a better place for a reply. Frankly, I very much doubt that Conn has been working on a book so far as I don't think sufficient information about the case is available to anyone at the moment except those directly involved in it.
However, it did occur to me that this thread has been the best informed resource of all about the case. I'd argue vigorously that someone wanting to understand what the case is about and how the Panel will approach it would have been much better advised to pick their way judiciously through this thread rather than rely on anything in the mainstream media except Stefan's contributions. And his views are given in more detail in this thread anyway.
If the outcome is a decent one for he club, maybe someone should wait for the make a book out of the foremost contributions from this thread. I don't claim that all of it hits the heights by any means - far from it! - but the best posts in this thread would be more than a match than anything that the mainstream sports media can produce.
I can imagine people reading this and thinking that I can't be serious becaise it's just mental. I do actually mean it. I can see it now. A working title of 'City On Trial!' with a subtitle of 'How the Blue Moon forum saw the attempt to stitch up City'. Who's in?