The article was asking whether a two state solution was possible and, as far as I can see, equally scathing of both Israelis and Palestinians who wanted the removal of the other people by any means.I have very little interest in journalism (or commentary on forums) that frames the problem primarily through the attitudes of people on either or both sides. No, the problem is the violations of international law. Whether or not some people in the West Bank say offensive things to a journalist (who for some reason didn't meet and quote any of the many Jewish Israeli open supporters of genocide) is of no relevance to the illegality of the occupation of the West Bank or of the many war crimes which the Israeli state and army commits both there and in Gaza. Yes, the situation is complex but that doesn't give us permission either morally or politically to throw up our hands and say that it's too difficult to do anything but leave the status quo in place.
Trump will move in with putin and build a load of hotelsI fear what will happen once the last of the hostages have been handed over.
There could be if they would agree to extend phase 1 of the ceasefire.Israeli's have put a block on all humanitarian aid into Gaza. Nothing whatsoever is going in.
Back to starving them to death again.
There could be if they would agree to extend phase 1 of the ceasefire.
Cannot understand why they would rather see their people be starved as opposed to working toward a peaceful solution. It is in their hands to stop the suffering and work toward peace.
according to the original timetable of the ceasefire agreement, they should be moving on to phase 2 now. It's Israel that is refusing to do so, mainly because phase 2 involves starting to withdraw their troops from Gaza. Yes, Hamas could extend phase 1, but that doesn't change the fact the only reason that they might need to do so is because Israel has gone back on its word (just like it has in Southern Lebanon by the way).There could be if they would agree to extend phase 1 of the ceasefire.
Cannot understand why they would rather see their people be starved as opposed to working toward a peaceful solution. It is in their hands to stop the suffering and work toward peace.
I agree but here we have a classic impasse so to help save the innocent people who are suffering as a result of what the Israelies are doing, just agree to extend phase 1 in the interim, else people will suffer.I get they both have to work together to maintain a ceasefire, but nobody is forcing Israel to block aid and starve people yet you seem to make out Palestinians are to blame for that? Aid getting into Gaza won't put Israel in any danger it is the moral thing to do regardless of past events, how can you build towards peace if you won't let aid workers help desperate civilians?
I get they both have to work together to maintain a ceasefire, but nobody is forcing Israel to block aid and starve people yet you seem to make out Palestinians are to blame for that? Aid getting into Gaza won't put Israel in any danger it is the moral thing to do regardless of past events, how can you build towards peace if you won't let aid workers help desperate civilians?
With Trump’s blessing they are going to level what’s left of Gaza and probably the same in the West Bank and other parts of the Middle East, it would seem.
How that will benefit the hostages, I’ve no idea. But they will however be used as the excuse for a land grab.