President Trump

The 'not buying ' isnt the 'illegal boycott '. Its the vandalizing Tesla stores. The burning of recharge stations. The throwing of Molotov cocktails into show rooms, the shooting up of show rooms, the pelting and keying swastikas on random Tesla's you see on the street and the attacking of people driving Teslas. . etc.

I think that's what describes the illegal protests. But im sure all this has been discussed here and condemned vociferously ;)

Oh wait, it hasn't? Im shocked!!!

Carry on
oh look, he's back.

But all you describe is merely exercising the right to free speech isn't it?

Still happy with how things are going over in Shitgibbonland then Dax?
 
The 'not buying ' isnt the 'illegal boycott '. Its the vandalizing Tesla stores. The burning of recharge stations. The throwing of Molotov cocktails into show rooms, the shooting up of show rooms, the pelting and keying swastikas on random Tesla's you see on the street and the attacking of people driving Teslas. . etc.

I think that's what describes the illegal protests. But im sure all this has been discussed here and condemned vociferously ;)

Oh wait, it hasn't? Im shocked!!!

Carry on

But you accept entirely that it is not an 'illegal boycott' to exercise your right to not buy a particular type of car?
 
The 'not buying ' isnt the 'illegal boycott '. Its the vandalizing Tesla stores. The burning of recharge stations. The throwing of Molotov cocktails into show rooms, the shooting up of show rooms, the pelting and keying swastikas on random Tesla's you see on the street and the attacking of people driving Teslas. . etc.

I think that's what describes the illegal protests. But im sure all this has been discussed here and condemned vociferously ;)

Oh wait, it hasn't? Im shocked!!!

Carry on
That's because it's fucking funny.
 
But you accept entirely that it is not an 'illegal boycott' to exercise your right to not buy a particular type of car?
Boycott and vandalization are two completely different things. Trump literally said "illegal boycott"; it wasn't implicit. He stated the boycott of Tesla was illegal. Which, patently, is a crock of shit. Although little surprise to see some jump staunchly to the fascists defence.
 
The 'not buying ' isnt the 'illegal boycott '. Its the vandalizing Tesla stores. The burning of recharge stations. The throwing of Molotov cocktails into show rooms, the shooting up of show rooms, the pelting and keying swastikas on random Tesla's you see on the street and the attacking of people driving Teslas. . etc.

I think that's what describes the illegal protests. But im sure all this has been discussed here and condemned vociferously ;)

Oh wait, it hasn't? Im shocked!!!

Carry on
You’ve gone from boycotting to protesting.
I understand one being illegal but not the other.
You can of course legally protest too.
At least you could, once.
 
In another Oval Office classic, Trump is now accusing Ireland of stealing the US pharmaceutical industry.

I can see a Christmas #1 later this year: Donald where's your allies?
 
The 'not buying ' isnt the 'illegal boycott '. Its the vandalizing Tesla stores. The burning of recharge stations. The throwing of Molotov cocktails into show rooms, the shooting up of show rooms, the pelting and keying swastikas on random Tesla's you see on the street and the attacking of people driving Teslas. . etc.

I think that's what describes the illegal protests. But im sure all this has been discussed here and condemned vociferously ;)

Oh wait, it hasn't? Im shocked!!!

Carry on
Hey gimp, have YOU condemned any of the things Trump has done? Any of his policies? I recall you didn't like Gaetz. That's one.

Oh wait, you haven't? Im [sic] shocked!!!

Carry on (or fuck off, either way).

BTW I wonder why Trump condemned the "illegal boycott" and not all those things you mentioned. I mean, I can understand he might be so stupid he might not be able to define what a boycott even is, but YOU are smart enough to get it.
 
The 'not buying ' isnt the 'illegal boycott '. Its the vandalizing Tesla stores. The burning of recharge stations. The throwing of Molotov cocktails into show rooms, the shooting up of show rooms, the pelting and keying swastikas on random Tesla's you see on the street and the attacking of people driving Teslas. . etc.

I think that's what describes the illegal protests. But im sure all this has been discussed here and condemned vociferously ;)

Oh wait, it hasn't? Im shocked!!!

Carry on

Vandalising Tesla stores, burning recharge stations and keying/spraypainting cars is called criminal damage not boycotting the company.

Are there any other crimes that have been redefined in the MAGA dictionary for idiots?
 
You’ve gone from boycotting to protesting.
I understand one being illegal but not the other.
You can of course legally protest too.
At least you could, once.
I vaguely remember them attempting to make boycotting Israeli products illegal once upon a time. Can't remember if that was in the US or UK though.
 
I vaguely remember them attempting to make boycotting Israeli products illegal once upon a time. Can't remember if that was in the US or UK though.
It was the UK.
Some councils in support of the murder of innocent Palestinians looked to boycott certain Israeli products. The Tories threatened to fine them if they did.
 
oh look, he's back.

But all you describe is merely exercising the right to free speech isn't it?

Still happy with how things are going over in Shitgibbonland then Dax?
Burning other people's property isnt free speech.
Why do some struggle so much to understand this.

As to your question, it has a false premise. I am not happy or sad. But im okay with it. Im certain whatever upheaval is occuring isnt a function of purposeful sabotage. I couldn't say the same of the last admin.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top