PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Gordyola said:
What a shite inaccurate article horrendous for a journalist

As you are probably aware they weren't relegated, fined and faced to sell players This was because the club had become a treat to the original founder clubs that wanted to maintain amateur status

"The club faces 130 charges of breaching Financial Fair Play regulations between 2009-18"
No they don't it breaking financial rules some of the charges pre-date FFP

"They have taken a series of legal actions against the Premier League, challenging PSR under competition law"
No it was APT rules

"It’s safe to assume that if City are found guilty, they will appeal, and then potentially take legal action to overturn the verdict"
Only appeal if procedure hasn't been followed by the tribunal. Legal action is very doubtful
Click to expand...
As regards your last paragraph surely City could appeal on a point of law?
 
Marvin. said:
It's ambiguous. I think the PL and City will link to the judgement when the time comes. In one of the APT cases, the PL provided a link to the judgement hosted on their website.

No need to pick holes. Let's just wait and see. I think it might be true because why would Gone for a Burton do this?
Click to expand...
It’s usually that they genuinely believe the person that told them but the person that told them was either lying or was told be a liar themselves….and on it goes.

The fact that he can’t see the contradiction between there are no leaks and himself leaking is all you need to know.
 
Cobwebcat said:
It’s usually that they genuinely believe the person that told them but the person that told them was either lying or was told be a liar themselves….and on it goes.

The fact that he can’t see the contradiction between there are no leaks and himself leaking is all you need to know.
Click to expand...
How can he tell you? If he has any sense he will stop posting now. Then tomorrow we will see,

I am a sucker. I know. But if I knew I would do similar only I'd post it two or three times and no more.
 
Marvin. said:
Perhaps they have. We only have to wait 24 hours.
Click to expand...

According to Ahsan, who has better sources than essentially everybody on this board now, City had not received the judgment as of yesterday. Going through a legal document of presumably hundreds of pages is not a one or two day job from either side.

You can all get excited if you so wish but when tomorrow comes and there's nothing and that lad admits that he was fucking you about then don't be outraged about it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top